All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Psychology  2019 

Imbuing Education with Brain Research Can Improve Teaching and Enhance Productive Learning

DOI: 10.4236/psych.2019.102010, PP. 122-311

Keywords: Neuropedagogy, Improving Teaching and Learning, Innovations in Teaching, Teaching Practices, Teacher-Students Relations, Teacher Education, Teachers’ Professional Development, School Principals Professional Development

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


The article presents an experimental three-year Neuropedagogy Adaptation Project (NAP) that exposed practicing teachers to neuroscientific concepts and research findings in order to merge them with their teaching and classroom management practice. The project addressed two basic issues. First, selecting pertinent neuroscientific content areas that are best applicable to teaching and learning. Second, establishing a methodology and practice to infuse education with neuroscientific knowhow. The article gives an account of the project’s guidelines, and participants’ applications of neuroscientific concepts to classroom practices, and teacher student relationships. Based on the conclusions derived from the project, we argue that the time is ripe for establishing a new educational discipline—Neuropedagogy that is a blend of neuroscience, neurocognitive psychology and education.


[1]  Ansari, D., Koning, J., Leask, M., & Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2017). Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience: Implications for Teachers’ Pedagogical Knowledge. In S. Guerriero (Ed.), Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession (pp. 195-222). Paris: OECD Publishing.
[2]  Ansari, D., Smedt, B., & Grabner, R. H. (2011). Neuroeducation—A Critical Overview of an Emerging Field. Neuroethics, 5, 105-117.
[3]  Daniel, D. B. (2014). Preaching about Teaching: Translating Mind, Brain, and Education to the Classroom. Paper Presented at the Meeting of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society, Fort Worth, TX.
[4]  Dubinsky, J. M., Roehrig, G., &, Varma, S. (2013). Infusing Neuroscience into Teacher Professional Development. Educational Researcher, 42, 317-329.
[5]  Fischer, K. W., & Daniel, D. B. (2009). Need for Infrastructure to Connect Research with Practice in Education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3, 1-2.
[6]  Friedman, I., Teichman-Weinberg, A., & Grobgeld, E. (2016). The Achva Model of Neuropedagogy: Applying Findings from Brain Research to Teaching and Learning. Achva Academic College.
[7]  Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014). Neuroscience and Education: Myths and Messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 817.
[8]  Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
[9]  Levit-Binnun, N., Hadar, L. L., Albelda, N., & Ergaz, O. (2018). De-Educating “Neuromiths” through “Personal Brain Investigations”: A Case Study of an Experimental Teacher Development Program. New York: The American Educational Research Association.
[10]  Morein-Zamir, S., & Shakrian, B. S. (2010). Neuroethics and Public Engagement Training Needs for Neuroscientists. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 49-51.
[11]  Pickering, S. J., & Howard-Jones, P. (2007). Educators’ Views on the Role of Neuroscience in Education: Findings from a Study of UK and International Perspectives. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1, 109-113.
[12]  Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2018). Using Research from the Learning Sciences to Improve Teaching. New York: The American Educational Research Association.
[13]  Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2016). Making Classrooms Better. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
[14]  Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2011). Mind, Brain, and Education Science. A Comprehensive Guide to the New Brain-Based Teaching. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.


comments powered by Disqus