All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

A Comparison of TOEFL iBT and IELTS Reading Tests

DOI: 10.4236/jss.2018.68023, PP. 283-309

Keywords: TOEFL iBT Reading Tests, IELTS Reading Tests, Test Comparison Analysis

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


With the increasing popularity among test takers and mounting acceptance from academic institutions, TOEFL iBT and IELTS are regarded and treated as equals due to similar purposes and goals. In depth, they distinguish each other in various aspects. By integrating Bachman’s framework of test method facet and Alderson’s variables of reading nature, this article formulates a comparison framework in an attempt to compare the reading parts of these two tests. The results show they share more similarities in test rubrics and input format and slightly differ from each other in score method and specification of procedures and tasks. However, substantial differences are identified in such areas as the nature of language and characteristics of tasks, which has a significant impact on test takers’ performance because TOEFL iBT reading test is more difficult in terms of readability, text types, topical features and question types, while IELTS more complex in text length and grammatical intricacy.


[1]  Ross, M.K. (2017) IELTS vs. TOEFL: What Are the Differences?
[2]  Bachman, L.F. (1999) Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[3]  Alderson, J.C. (2000) Assessing Reading. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[4]  Chastain, K. (1988) Developing Second Language Skills: Theory and Practice. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Orlando.
[5]  Gaite, A.J.H. and Newsom, R.S. (1971) Prose Learning: Effects of Pretesting and Reduction of Passage Length. Psychological Reports, 28, 123-129.
[6]  Mehrpour, S. and Riazi, A. (2004) The Impact of Text Length on EFL Students’ Reading Comprehension. Asian EFL Journal, 8, 72-90.
[7]  Wang, Y. (2012) The Effect of Text Length on Students Reading Comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1, 1160-1166.
[8]  Jalilehvand, M. (2012) The Effects of Text Length and Picture on Reading Comprehension of Iranian EFL Students. Asian Social Science, 8, 6346-6352.
[9]  Commander, N.E. and Stanwyck, D.J. (1997) Illusion of Knowing in Adult Readers: Effects of Reading Skill and Passage Length. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 39-52.
[10]  Minryoung, E. (2017) The Effects of Text Length and Question Type on the Reading Comprehension Test Performance of Korean EFL Readers.
[11]  Rothkopf, E.Z. and Billington, M.J. (1983) Passage Length and Recall with Test Size Held Constant: Effects of Modality, Pacing, and Learning Set. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 667-681.
[12]  Cha, K.A. (1995) The Effect of Text Length in the Diagnosis of Reading Comprehension. Journal of the Applied Linguistics Association of Korea, 8, 249-275.
[13]  Laufer, B. (1989) What Percentage of Text-Lexis Is Essential for Comprehension? In: Lauren, C. and Nordman, M., Eds., Special Language: From Human Thinking to Thinking Machines, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, 316-323.
[14]  Graham, D.M. and Watts, S.M. (1990) Contextual Analysis in Naturally Occurring Prose: Effects of Passage Length, Word Frequency, and Grade. Analysis of Variance, 46, 93-104.
[15]  Golkar, M. and Yamini, M. (2007) Vocabulary, Proficiency and Reading Comprehension. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 7, 88-112.
[16]  Morton, J. (1979) Facilitation in Word Recognition: Experiments Causing Change in the Logogen Model. Processing of Visible Language. Springer, Berlin.
[17]  Forster, K.I. and Bednall, E.S. (1976) Terminating and Exhaustive Search in Lexical Access. Memory and Cognition, 4, 53-61.
[18]  Gough, P.B. (1984) Word Recognition. In: Pearson, P.D., Eds., Handbook of Reading Research, Longman Press, London, 225-254.
[19]  Viking, B. (1989) What Makes a Text Easy or Difficult to Understand? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 33, 259-267.
[20]  Paribakht, T.S. and Webb, S. (2016) The Relationship between Academic Vocabulary Coverage and Scores on a Standardized English Proficiency Test. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 121-132.
[21]  Coxhead, A. (2000) A New Academic Word List. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213-238.
[22]  Gardner, D. and Davies, M. (2014) A New Academic Vocabulary List. Applied Linguistics, 35, 305-327.
[23]  Richards, B. (1987) Type/Token Ratios: What Do They Really Tell Us? Journal of Child Language, 14, 201-209.
[24]  McEnery, T. and Wilson, A. (2001) Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. 2nd Edition, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
[25]  Kettunen, K. (2014) Can Type-Token Ratio Be Used to Show Morphological Complexity of Languages? Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 21, 223-245.
[26]  Halliday, M.A.K. (2008) Complementarities in Language. The Commercial Press, Beijing.
[27]  Ure, J. (1971) Lexical Density and Register Differentiation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 5, 96-104.
[28]  Standal, T. (1987) Computer-Measured Readability. Computers in the School, 4, 123-132.
[29]  Carrell, P.L. (1987) Readability in ESL. Reading in a Foreign Language, 4, 21-40.
[30]  Downing, P., Givón, T. and Givon, T. (1995) Functionalism and Grammar. Language, 73, 403.
[31]  Berman, R.A. (1984) Syntactic Components of the Foreign Language Reading Process. In: Alderson, J.C. and Urquhart, A.H., Eds., Reading in a Foreign Language, Longman, London, 139-159.
[32]  Bachman, L.F. and Palmer, A.S. (1996) Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[33]  Cromley, J.G. and Azevedo, R. (2007) Testing and Refining the Direct and Inferential Model of Reading Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311-325.
[34]  Fisher, D. and Frey, N. (2009) Background Knowledge: The Missing Piece of the Comprehension Puzzle. Heinemann, Portsmouth.
[35]  Stahl, S.A. (1991) Defining the Role of Prior Knowledge and Vocabulary in Reading Comprehension: The Retiring of Number 41. Journal of Literacy Research, 23, 487-508.
[36]  Krekeler, C. (2006) Language for Special Academic Purposes Testing: The Effect of Background Knowledge Revisited. Language Testing, 23, 99-130.
[37]  Tarchi, C. (2010) Reading Comprehension of Informative Texts in Secondary School: A Focus on Direct and Indirect Effects of Reader’s Prior Knowledge. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 415-420.
[38]  Alderson, J.C. and Urquhart, A.H. (1985) The Effect of Students’ Academic Discipline on Their Performance on ESP Reading Tests. Language Testing, 2, 192-204.
[39]  Enright, M.K., Grabe, W., Koda, K., Mosenthal, P., Mulcahy-Ernt, P. and Schedl, M. (2000) Toefl 2000 Reading Framework: A Working Paper. TOEFL Monograph Series, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, i-157.
[40]  Weaver, C.A. and Bryant, D.S. (1995) Monitoring of Comprehension: The Role of Text Difficulty in Metamemory for Narrative and Expository Text. Memory and Cognition, 23, 12-22.
[41]  Liu, J. (1998) The Effect of Test Method on Reading Comprehension. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 5, 23-45.
[42]  Merç, A. (2014) Effect of Test Method on EFL Reading Comprehension. Language Assessment, 11, 15-27.
[43]  Nbiria, R. (2014) Test Method Effect on the Reading Comprehension Performance. Language Testing, 3, 61-68.
[44]  Kobayashi, M. (2002) Method Effects on Reading Comprehension Test Performance: Text Organization and Response Format. Language Testing, 19, 193-220.
[45]  Gallagher, N. (2005) Delta’s Key to the Next Generation TOEFL Test: Advanced Skill Practice. Longman, London.
[46]  Van Dijk, T.A. and Kintsch, W. (1983) Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. Academic Press, New York.
[47]  Pearson, P.D. and Johnson, D.D. (1978) Teaching Reading Comprehension. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
[48]  Bennsoussan, M., et al. (1984) The Effect of Dictionary Usage on EFL Test Performance Compared with Student and Teacher Attitudes and Expectations. Reading in a Foreign Language, 2, 124-126.


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us


微信:OALib Journal