This paper takes the tuition policy of Chinese colleges and universities as the research object, studies the main problems through fuzzy evaluation method, and establishes the index system for the evaluation of tuition policies of ordinary colleges and universities. Based on the index system, this paper makes an empirical research and analysis on the colleges and universities in Shaanxi province. It is found that the main problems of China’s colleges and universities’ tuition policy are that students and their families have low ability to obtain information related to the tuition policy of ordinary colleges and universities, and the rising tuition fees have had a big impact on whether students can fairly accept higher education opportunities, the objective of the tuition policy of ordinary colleges and universities is not reasonable, and at the same time, the participation of stakeholders in setting the tuition standard of ordinary colleges and universities is less. In view of the above problems, this paper puts forward relevant policy suggestions.
References
[1]
Cao, S. J. (2014). Study on the Cost and Tuition of Higher Education in China. Research on Higher Education in China, 5, 44-49.
[2]
Chen, K. D., Huang, L., & Tang, S. Q. (2002). Several Principles for the Design of Higher Education Evaluation Index System. Research on Higher Education in Guangxi, 3, 111-112.
[3]
Chen, Q. Y. (2006). Analysis of Public Policy. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
[4]
Ge, J. S. (2001). Research on the Implementation of Cost Charge Reform in Higher Education. Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University, 6, 116-118.
[5]
Li, D. G., & Cai, J. J. (2006). Western Policy Assessment Techniques and Methods. Science and Technology Policy and Management, 4, 65-69.
[6]
Li, Y., Zhou, J. J., & Liu, X. N. (2016). Multiple Linear Regression Model of College Tuition Based on MATLAB. Information Technology and Informationization, 11, 84-86.
[7]
Liu, H., & Liu, X. F. (2008). An Analytical Framework for the Law of Public Policy—Also Discuss with Mr. Liu Bin. Administrative Tribune, 3, 47-51.
[8]
Lu, G. S., & Zhong, Y. P. (2002). Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of High Education Cost Recovery. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
[9]
Luo, S. Q., & Zheng, Z. (2018). Studies Based on the Same Cost Performance of College Tuition Pricing Methods. China’s Prices, 1, 44-47.
[10]
Measures for the Implementation of Shaanxi Education fee Decision-Making Hearing System. http://www.southcn.com/law/fzzt/fgsjk/200507090323.htm
[11]
Ning, S. (2003). Public Policy Studies. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
[12]
Schultz, T. W. (2008). Investment in Mon: An Economics’ View. Society Sernice Review, 33, 54-78.
[13]
William, D. (2002). Introduction to Public Policy Analysis. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.
[14]
Wu, H. Q., & Duan, Q. R. (2016). Systematic Dynamic Analysis of Cost Increase of Higher Education from the Perspective of Tuition Fee. Education and Economy, 10, 30-35.
[15]
Wu, H. Q., Wu, Y. J., & Li, N. (2012). A Study on College Tuition Pricing Based on the Cost per Student—Take Seven Universities in Hunan for Example. Economic Research Reference, 11, 61-68.
[16]
Yu, F. (2002). Analysis on Public School Education Fee Price Hearing System. 4.
[17]
Yuan, L. S. (2006). American Higher Education Costs, Prices and Student Funding— Based on Congressional Research. Comparative Education Study, 8, 1-5.
[18]
Zhang, J. M. (2004). Public Policy Analysis: Concepts, Processes, Methods. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.
