We elaborate on an alternative representation of
conditional probability to the usual tree diagram. We term the representation “turtleback
diagram” for its resemblance to the pattern on turtle shells. Adopting the set
theoretic view of events and the sample space, the turtleback diagram uses
elements from Venn diagrams—set intersection, complement and partition—for
conditioning, with the additional notion that the area of a set indicates
probability whereas the ratio of areas for conditional probability. Once parts
of the diagram are drawn and properly labeled, the calculation of conditional
probability involves only simple arithmetic on the area of relevant sets. We
discuss turtleback diagrams in relation to other visual representations of
conditional probability, and detail several scenarios in which turtleback
diagrams prove useful. By the equivalence of recursive space partition and the tree,
the turtleback diagram is seen to be equally expressive as the tree diagram for
abstract concepts. We also provide empirical data on the use of turtleback diagrams
with undergraduate students in elementary statistics or probability courses.
References
[1]
Rice, J. (1995) Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. 2nd Edition, Duxbury Press, Duxbury, Massachusetts.
[2]
Johnson, R. and Tsui, K. (2003) Statistical Reasoning and Methods. John Wiley, New York.
[3]
Ancker, J.S. (2006) The Language of Conditional Probability. Journal of Statistics Education, 14, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2006.11910584
[4]
Mann, P. (2003) Introductory Statistics. John Wiley, New York.
[5]
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1980) Causal Schemas in Judgments under Uncertainty. Progress in Social Psychology, 1, 49-72.
[6]
Fischbein, E. and Gazit, A. (1984) Does the Teaching of Probability Improve Probabilistic Intuitions? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 1-24.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380436
[7]
Falk, R. (1986) Conditional Probabilities: Insights and Difficulties. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Teaching Statistics, The Second International Committee on Teaching Statistics, Victoria, 292-297.
[8]
Tarr, J.E. and Jones, G.A. (1997) A Framework for Assessing Middle School Students? Thinking in Conditional Probability and Independence. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9, 39-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217301
[9]
Tomlinson, S. and Quinn, R. (1997) Understanding Conditional Probability. Teaching Statistics, 19, 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9639.1997.tb00309.x
[10]
Tarr, J.E. (2002) The Confounding Effects of the Phrase ‘50-50 Chance’ in Making Conditional Probability Judgments. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 24, 35-53.
[11]
Yánez, G.C. (2002) Some Challenges for the Use of Computer Simulations for Solving Conditional Probability Problems. The 6th International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Cape Town.
[12]
Tarr, J.E. and Lannin, J.K. (2005) How Can Teachers Build Notions of Conditional Probability and Independence? In: Jones, G.A., Ed., Exploring Probability in School, Springer, US, New York, 215-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24530-8_10
[13]
Arcavi, A. (2003) The Role of Visual Representations in the Learning of Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 215-241.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024312321077
[14]
Presmeg, N.C. (2006) Research on Visualization in Learning and Teaching Mathematics. In: Gutierrez, A. and Boero, P., Eds., Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, 205-235.
[15]
Tukey, J. (1977) Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Morris, D. (2016) Bayes’ Theorem Examples: A Visual Introduction for Beginners.
[18]
Collins, R. (2017) Bayes Theorem Examples: Visual Book for Beginners.
[19]
Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., Dunson, D.B., Vehtari, A. and Rubin, D.B. (2013) Bayesian Data Analysis. 3rd Edition, Chapman and Hall, London.
[20]
Edwards, A.W.F. (2004) Cogwheels of the Mind: The Story of Venn Diagrams. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
[21]
Gigerenzer, G. and Hoffrage, U. (1995) How to Improve Bayesian Reasoning without Instruction: Frequency Formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684-705.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.684
[22]
Yamagishi, K. (2003) Facilitating Normative Judgments of Conditional Probability: Frequency or Nested Sets? Experimental Psychology, 50, 97-106.
https://doi.org/10.1026//1618-3169.50.2.97
Sloman, S.A., Over, D., Slovak, L. and Stibel, J.M. (2003) Frequency Illusions and Other Fallacies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 296-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00021-9
[25]
Deacon, T.W. (1998) The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Brain. W.W. Norton & Company, New York.
[26]
Chartrand, G. and Zhang, P. (2011) Discrete Mathematics. Waveland Press, Inc., Long Grove.
[27]
Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R. and Stone, C. (1984) Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman & Hall, New York.
[28]
Dasgupta, S. and Freund, Y. (2008) Random Projection Trees and Low Dimensional Manifolds. 40th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Victoria, 17-20 May 2008, 537-546. https://doi.org/10.1145/1374376.1374452
[29]
Yan, D., Huang, L. and Jordan, M. (2009) Fast Approximate Spectral Clustering. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Paris, 28 June-1 July 2009, 907-916.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1557019.1557118
