All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

A New Method to Select Training Images in Multi-Point Geostatistics

DOI: 10.4236/ojogas.2018.32010, PP. 112-129

Keywords: Training Image, Single Data Event Repetition Probability, Repetition Probability Mean Value, Multi-Point Geostatistics

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


Training images, as an important modeling parameter in the multi-point geostatistics, directly determine the effect of modeling. It’s necessary to evaluate and select the candidate training image before using the multi-point geostatistical modeling. The overall repetition probability is not sufficient to describe the relationship of single data events in the training image. Based on the understanding, a new method was presented in this paper to select the training image. As is shown in the basic idea, the repetition probability distribution of a single data event was used to characterize the type and stationarity of the sedimentary pattern in the training image. The repetition probability mean value and deviation of single data event reflected the stationarity of the geological model of the training image; the rate of data event mismatching reflected the diversity of geological patterns in training images. The selection of optimal training image was achieved by combining the probability of repeated events and the probability of overall repetition of single data events. It’s illustrated in the simulation tests that a good training image has the advantages of high repetition probability compatibility, stable distribution of repeated probability of single data event, low probability mean value, low probability deviation and low rate of mismatching. The method can quickly select the training image and provide the basic guarantee for multi-point geostatistical simulations.


[1]  Guardiano, F.B. and Srivastava, R.M. (1993) Multivariate Geostatistics: Beyond Bivariate Moments. Springer, Netherlands.
[2]  Arpat, G.B. and Caers, J. (2007) Conditional Simulation with Patterns. Mathematical Geology, 39, 177-203.
[3]  Boisvert, J.B., Pyrcz, M.J. and Deutsch, C.V. (2007) Multiple-Point Statistics for Training Image Selection. Natural Resources Research, 16, 313-321.
[4]  Hu, L.Y. and Chugunova, T. (2008) Multiple-Point Geostatistics for Modeling Subsurface Heterogeneity: A Comprehensive Review. Water Resources Research, 44, 2276-2283.
[5]  Mariethoz, G. and Caers, J. (2014) Multiple-Point Geostatistics: Stochastic Modeling with Training Images.
[6]  Pérez, C., Mariethoz, G. and Ortiz, J.M. (2014) Verifying the High-Order Consistency of Training Images with Data for Multiple-Point Geostatistics. Computers & Geosciences, 70, 190-205.
[7]  Strebelle, S.B. and Journel, A.G. (2001) Reservoir Modeling Using Multiple-point Statistics. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
[8]  Zhang, T., Switzer, P. and Journel, A. (2006) Filter-Based Classification of Training Image Patterns for Spatial Simulation. Mathematical Geology, 38, 63-80.
[9]  Yin, Y., Zhang, C., Li, J., et al. (2011) Progress and Prospect of Multiple-Point Geostatistics. Journal of Palaeogeography, 13, 245-252.
[10]  Haldorsen, H.H. and Chang, D.M. (1986) Notes on Stochastic Shales; from Outcrop to Simulation Model. Reservoir Characterization, 445-485.
[11]  Lantuéjoul, C. (2002) Geostatistical Simulation. Models and Algorithms. Minerva Ginecologica, 39, 503-510.
[12]  Deutsch, C.V. and Tran, T.T. (2002) FLUVSIM: A Program for Object-Based Stochastic Modeling of Fluvial Depositional Systems. Computers & Geosciences, 28, 525-535.
[13]  Pyrcz, M.J., Boisvert, J.B. and Deutsch, C.V. (2009) ALLUVSIM: A Program for Event-Based Stochastic Modeling of Fluvial Depositional Systems. Computers & Geosciences, 35, 1671-1685.
[14]  Shi, S., Hu, S., Feng, W., et al. (2012) Building Geological Knowledge Database Based on Google Earth Software. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 30, 869-878.
[15]  Michael, H.A., Li, H., Boucher, A., et al. (2010) Combining Geologic-Process Models and Geostatistics for Conditional Simulation of 3-D Subsurface Heterogeneity. Water Resources Research, 46, 1532-1535.
[16]  Comunian, A., Jha, S.K., Giambastiani, B., et al. (2014) Training Images from Process-Imitating Methods. Mathematical Geosciences, 46, 241-260.
[17]  Zhang, W., Duan, T., Zheng, L., et al. (2015) Generation and Application of Three-Dimensional MPS Training Images Based on Shallow Seismic Data. Oil & Gas Geology, 36, 1030-1037.
[18]  Fadlelmula, F.M.M., Killough, J. and Fraim, M. (2016) Ti Converter: A Training Image Converting Tool for Multiple-Point Geostatistics. Computers & Geosciences, 96, 47-55.
[19]  Ortiz, J.M. and Deutsch, C.V. (2004) Indicator Simulation Accounting for Multiple-Point Statistics. Mathematical Geology, 36, 545-565.
[20]  Feng, W., Wu, S., Yin, Y., et al. (2017) A Training Image Evaluation and Selection Method Based on Minimum Data Event Distance for Multiple-Point Geostatistics. Computers & Geosciences, 104, 35-53.
[21]  Ding, F., Lu, Y., Duan, D., et al. (2017) Complex Superimposition Type Sandbody Characterized by Multiple-Point Geostatistics Modeling Method. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 10, 34-38.
[22]  Liu, K., Hou, J., Liu, Y., et al. (2016) Application of Multiple-Point Geostatistics in 3D Internal Architecture Modeling of Point Bar. Oil & Gas Geology, 37, 577-583.
[23]  Chen, G., Zhao, F., Wang, J., et al. (2015) Regionalized Multiple-Point Stochastic Geological Modeling: A Case from Braided Delta Sedimentary Reservoirs in Qaidam Basin, NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 52, 638-645.


comments powered by Disqus