All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Psychology  2017 

The Effects of Trajectory and Endpoint Errors in a Reaching Movement on the Sense of Agency

DOI: 10.4236/psych.2017.814146, PP. 2321-2332

Keywords: Sense of Agency, Online Motor Control, Error Detection

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


The sense of agency (SoA) refers to the subjective feeling that an individual can control their own action with their own will. However, it is still unclear which aspects of the motor control process precisely affect the sense of agency. In this study, we investigated how the SoA is modulated by the online motor performance (trajectory error) and the outcome of the reaching movement (endpoint error). The results showed that the invalid priming and the visual feedback delay significantly increased both the trajectory and endpoint errors and that these errors significantly attenuated the SoA. The further correlation analyses showed that the decrease in SoA was significantly correlated with the trajectory error, but not with the endpoint error, when the error was explicitly noticed. We suggest that the deterioration in online motor performance, at least in a reaching movement, is the main cause of the attenuation in the SoA.


[1]  Aarts, H., Custers, R., & Wegner, D. M. (2005). On the Inference of Personal Authorship: Enhancing Experienced Agency by Priming Effect Information. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 439-458.
[2]  Afraz, S.-R., Kiani, R., & Esteky, H. (2006). Microstimulation of Inferotemporal Cortex Influences Face Categorization. Nature, 442, 692-695.
[3]  Blakemore, S. J., Frith, C. D., & Wolpert, D. M. (1999). Spatio-Temporal Prediction Modulates the Perception of Self-Produced Stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 551-559.
[4]  Blakemore, S. J., Wolpert, D., & Frith, C. (2000). Why Can’t You Tickle Yourself? Neuroreport, 11, R11-R16.
[5]  Caspar, E. A., Cleeremans, A., & Haggard, P. (2015). The Relationship between Human Agency and Embodiment. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 226-236.
[6]  Caspar, E. A., Desantis, A., Dienes, Z., Cleeremans, A., & Haggard, P. (2016). The Sense of Agency as Tracking Control. PLoS ONE, 11, 1-16.
[7]  Chambon, V., & Haggard, P. (2012). Sense of Control Depends on Fluency of Action Selection, Not Motor Performance. Cognition, 125, 441-451.
[8]  Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. P. (1987). The Measurement of Handedness. Brain and Cognition, 6, 175-183.
[9]  Damen, T. G. E., van Baaren, R. B., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2014). You Should Read This! Perceiving and Acting upon Action Primes Influences One’s Sense of Agency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 21-26.
[10]  David, N., Newen, A., & Vogeley, K. (2008). The “Sense of Agency” and Its Underlying Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 523-534.
[11]  Desmurget, M., & Grafton, S. (2000). Forward Modeling Allows Feedback Control for Fast Reaching Movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 423-431.
[12]  Farrer, C., Franck, N., Georgieff, N., Frith, C. D., Decety, J., & Jeannerod, M. (2003). Modulating the Experience of Agency: A Positron Emission Tomography Study. NeuroImage, 18, 324-333.
[13]  Farrer, C., Valentin, G., & Hupé, J. M. (2013). The Time Windows of the Sense of Agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 1431-1441.
[14]  Franck, N., Farrer, C., Georgieff, N., Marie-Cardine, M., Dalery, J., D’Amato, T., & Jeannerod, M. (2001). Defective Recognition of One’s Own Actions in Patients with Schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 454-459.
[15]  Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical Conceptions of the Self: Implications for Cognitive Science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 14-21.
[16]  Igarashi, K., Shibuya, S., Sano, H., Takahashi, M., Satomi, K., & Ohki, Y. (2011). Functional Assessment of Proximal Arm Muscles by target-Reaching Movements in Patients with Cervical Myelopathy. Spine Journal, 11, 270-280.
[17]  Ismail, M. A. F., & Shimada, S. (2016). “Robot” Hand Illusion under Delayed Visual Feedback: Relationship between the Senses of Ownership and Agency. PLoS ONE, 11, 1-9.
[18]  Kalckert, A., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2012). Moving a Rubber Hand That Feels Like Your Own: A Dissociation of Ownership and Agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1-14.
[19]  Messier, J., & Kalaska, J. F. (1999). Comparison of Variability of Initial Kinematics and Endpoints of Reaching Movements. Experimental Brain Research, 125, 139-152.
[20]  Moore, J. W., Wegner, D. M., & Haggard, P. (2009). Modulating the Sense of Agency with External Cues. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 1056-1064.
[21]  Osumi, M., Sumitani, M., Kumagaya, S., & Morioka, S. (2017). Optimal Control of Reaching Is Disturbed in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Single-Case Study. Journal of Pain Research, 10, 167-173.
[22]  Sato, A., & Yasuda, A. (2005). Illusion of Sense of Self-Agency: Discrepancy between the Predicted and Actual Sensory Consequences of Actions Modulates the Sense of Self-Agency, But Not the Sense of Self-Ownership. Cognition, 94, 241-255.
[23]  Sato, A. (2009). Both Motor Prediction and Conceptual Congruency between Preview and Action-Effect Contribute to Explicit Judgment of Agency. Cognition, 110, 74-83.
[24]  Shimada, S., Qi, Y., & Hiraki, K. (2010). Detection of Visual Feedback Delay in Active and Passive Self-Body Movements. Experimental Brain Research, 201, 359-364.
[25]  Shimada, S., Suzuki, T., Yoda, N., & Hayashi, T. (2014). Relationship between Sensitivity to Visuotactile Temporal Discrepancy and the Rubber Hand Illusion. Neuroscience Research, 85, 33-38.
[26]  Sidarus, N., Chambon, V., & Haggard, P. (2013). Priming of Actions Increases Sense of Control over Unexpected Outcomes. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 1403-1411.
[27]  Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., & Newen, A. (2008). Beyond the Comparator Model: A Multifactorial Two-Step Account of Agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 219-239.
[28]  Todorov, E., & Jordan, M. I. (2002). Optimal Feedback Control as a Theory of Motor Coordination. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1226-1235.
[29]  Van Den Bos, E., & Jeannerod, M. (2002). Sense of Body and Sense of Action Both Contribute to Self-Recognition. Cognition, 85, 177-187.
[30]  Wegner, D. M., Sparrow, B., & Winerman, L. (2004). Vicarious Agency: Experiencing Control over the Movements of Others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 838-848.
[31]  Wen, W., Yamashita, A., & Asama, H. (2015a). The Influence of Action-Outcome Delay and Arousal on Sense of Agency and the Intentional Binding Effect. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 87-95.
[32]  Wen, W., Yamashita, A., & Asama, H. (2015b). The Sense of Agency during Continuous Action: Performance Is More Important than Action-Feedback Association. PLoS ONE, 10, 1-16.
[33]  Wen, W., Yamashita, A., & Asama, H. (2016). Divided Attention and Processes Underlying Sense of Agency. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-8.
[34]  Wen, W., Yamashita, A., & Asama, H. (2017). The Influence of Performance on Action-Effect Integration in Sense of Agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 53, 89-98.
[35]  Wenke, D., Fleming, S. M., & Haggard, P. (2010). Subliminal Priming of Actions Influences Sense of Control over Effects of Action. Cognition, 115, 26-38.
[36]  Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000). Computational Principles of Movement Neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1212-1217.


comments powered by Disqus