We discuss globalization and the current recession
in manufacturing and construction. We present a theoretical model of
globalization, of two countries, X and Y, each with open-market systems
domestically and internationally. We compare two pricing policies in each
country: short-run marginal cost, SRMC, versus prices fixed, , over
the business cycle. We present a proposition and proof. We give a detailed
numerical example with graphs for each country. The main result is that ?over
the business cycle increases the volatility of Q demand over the cycle and
increases consumer surplus in both countries under certain conditions. The
numerical example shows a drawback of SRMC pricing under demand fluctuations—that
the required price in high-demand times to balance accounts becomes extremely
high. Consumers are better off with , paying a small increase over SRMC in the off-peak, 6/7th of
the time, to avoid the extremely large required price of SRMC in the peak
times, because it’s only 1/7 of the time. The surprising point is that though
peak times are infrequent, the prices and quantities at peak timesdetermine which pricing
arrangement is better for consumers.
References
[1]
Clark, J.M. (1923) Studies in the Economics of Overhead Costs. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[2]
Aranoff, G. (1991) John M. Clark’s Concept of Too Strong Competition and a Possible Case: The U.S. Cement Industry. Eastern Economic Journal, 17, 45-60.
[3]
Crew, M.A., Fernando, C.S. and Kleindorfer, P.R. (1995) The Theory of Peak-Load Pricing: A Survey. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 8, 215-248.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01070807
[4]
Clark, J.M. (1961) Competition as a Dynamic Process. The Brookings Institution, Washington DC.