All Title Author
Keywords Abstract


PP and PP Multi-Particles Production Investigation Based on CCNN Black-Box Approach

DOI: 10.4236/jamp.2017.56115, PP. 1398-1409

Keywords: Proton-Proton and Proton-Antiproton Collisions, Multiparticle Production, Multiplicity Distributions, Intelligent Computational Techniques, CCNN-Neural Networks, Black-Box Modeling Approach

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The multiplicity distribution (P(nch)) of charged particles produced in a high energy collision is a key quantity to understand the mechanism of multiparticle production. This paper describes the novel application of an artificial neural network (ANN) black-box modeling approach based on the cascade correlation (CC) algorithm formulated to calculate and predict multiplicity distribution of proton-proton (antiproton) (PP and PP ) inelastic interactions full phase space at a wide range of center-mass of energy \"\". In addition, the formulated cascade correlation neural network (CCNN) model is used to empirically calculate the average multiplicity distribution <nch> as a function of \"\". The CCNN model was designed based on available experimental data for \"\"= 30.4 GeV, 44.5 GeV, 52.6 GeV, 62.2 GeV, 200 GeV, 300 GeV, 540 GeV, 900 GeV, 1000 GeV, 1800 GeV, and 7 TeV. Our obtained empirical results for P(nch), as well as <nch> for (PP and PP) collisions are compared with the corresponding theoretical ones which obtained from other models. This comparison shows a good agreement with the available experimental data (up to 7 TeV) and other theoretical ones. At full large hadron collider (LHC) energy ( \"\"= 14 TeV) we have predicted P(nch) and <nch> which also, show a good agreement with different theoretical models.

References

[1]  Giovannini, A. and Ugoccioni, R. (1999) Soft and Semi-Hard Components Structure in Multiparticle Production in High Energy Collisions. Nuclear Physics B— Proceedings Supplements, 71, 201-210.
[2]  Giovannini, A. and Ugoccioni, R. (2003) Signals of New Physics in Global Event Properties in pp Collisions in the TeV Energy Domain. Physical Review D, 68, Article ID: 034009.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.034009
[3]  Beggio, P.C. (2017) Inelastic Cross Sections, Overlap Functions and Moments from ISR to LHC Energies in Proton Interactions. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, 44, Article ID: 025002.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/aa51f5
[4]  Feynman, R.P. (1969) Very High-Energy Collisions of Hadrons. Physical Review Letters, 23, 1415.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.23.1415
[5]  ALICE Collaboration (2015) Charged-Particle Multiplicities in Proton-Proton Collisions at s√ = 0.9 to 8 TeV. The European Physical Journal C, 77, 33.
[6]  Mukherjee, M. (2016) Multiplicity Distributions and Fluctuations in Proton-Proton and Heavy-Ion Collisions. In: EPJ Web of Conferences, Vol. 112, EDP Sciences, Article No. 04004.
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201611204004
[7]  Ghosh, P. and Muhuri, S. (2013) Multiplicity Distributions in the Forward Rapidity Region in Proton-Proton Collisions at the Large Hadron Collider. Physical Review D, 87, Article ID: 094020.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.87.094020
[8]  Kumar, A., Srivastava, P.K., Singh, B.K. and Singh, C.P. (2013) Charged Hadron Multiplicity Distribution at Relativistic Heavy-Ion Colliders. Advances in High Energy Physics, 2013, Article ID: 352180.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/352180
[9]  Grosse-Oetringhaus, J.F. and Reygers, K. (2010) Charged-Particle Multiplicity in Proton-Proton Collisions. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, 37, Article ID: 083001.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/37/8/083001
[10]  Toia, A. (2016) First Run II Results from ALICE. In: EPJ Web of Conferences, Vol. 120, EDP Sciences, Article No. 09003.
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201612009003
[11]  Kamodt, K., Abel, N., Abeysekara, U., Quintana, A.A., Abramyan, A., Adamova, D. and Ahammed, Z. (2010) Charged-Particle Multiplicity Measurement in Proton-Proton Collisions at\sqrt {s} = 0.9 and 2.36 TeV with ALICE at LHC. The European Physical Journal C, 68, 89-108.
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1339-x
[12]  Monteno, M. and ALICE Collaboration (2005) Particle Multiplicity in Proton-Proton Collisions with ALICE. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 5, 209.
[13]  Haykin, S. (2008) Neural Networks and Learning Machines. 3rd Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
[14]  Schmidt, M. and Lipson, H. (2009) Distilling Free-Form Natural Laws from Experimental Data. Science, 324, 81-85.
[15]  Link, J.M., Yager, P.M., Anjos, J.C., Bediaga, I., Castromonte, C., Göbel, C. and Pepe, I.M. (2005) Application of Genetic Programming to High Energy Physics Event Selection. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 551, 504-527.
[16]  Teodorescu, L. and Sherwood, D. (2008) High Energy Physics Event Selection with Gene Expression Programming. Computer Physics Communications, 178, 409-419.
[17]  El-Dahshan, E.S. (2011) Application of Genetic Programming for Proton-Proton Interactions. Open Physics, 9, 874-883.
https://doi.org/10.2478/s11534-010-0088-7
[18]  Denby, B. (1988) Neural Networks and Cellular Automata in Experimental High Energy Physics. Computer Physics Communications, 49, 429-448.
[19]  David, C., Freslier, M. and Aichelin, J. (1995) Impact Parameter Determination for Heavy-Ion Collisions by Use of a Neural Network. Physical Review C, 51, 1453.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.51.1453
[20]  McCulloch, W.S. and Pitts, W. (1943) A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 115-133.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478259
[21]  Rosenblatt, F. (1958) The Perceptron: A Probabilistic Model for Information Storage and Organization in the Brain. Psychological Review, 65, 386.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042519
[22]  Hoefeld, M. and Fahlman, S.E. (1991) Technical Report CMUCS-91-130. School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
[23]  Fahlman, S.E. (1991) The Recurrent Cascade-Correlation Architecture. Carnegie-Mellon University, Department of Computer Science, Pittsburgh.
[24]  Fahlman, S.E. and Liebiere, C. (1990) The Cascade—Correlation Learning Architecture. In: Touretzky, D.S., Ed., Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 2, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 524-532.
[25]  Fahlman, S.E. (1988) An Empirical Study of Learning Speed in Back-Propagation Networks. Technical Report CMU-CS-88-162, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
[26]  Ansorge, R.E., et al. (1989) Charged Particle Multiplicity Distributions at 200-GeV and 900-GeV Center-Of-Mass Energy. Zeitschrift für Physik C, 43, 357.
[27]  Breakstone, A., Campanini, R., Crawley, H.B., Dallavalle, G.M., Deninno, M.M., Doroba, K. and Fischer, H.G. (1984) Charged Multiplicity Distribution in pp Interactions at CERN ISR Energies. Physical Review D, 30, 528.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.30.528
[28]  Alexopoulos, T., Anderson, E.W., Biswas, N.N., Bujak, A., Carmony, D.D., Erwin, A.R. and Lindsey, C.S. (1998) The Role of Double Parton Collisions in Soft Hadron Interactions. Physics Letters B, 435, 453-457.
[29]  Alner, G.J., Alpga, K., Anderer, P., Ansorge, R.E., Berglund, S., Berkelman, K., Carlson, P., et al. (1987) UA5: A General Study of Proton-Antiproton Physics at √ s = 546 GeV. Physics Reports, 154, 247-383.
[30]  Alexopoulos, T., Allen, C., Anderson, E.W., Balamurali, V., Banerjee, S., Beery, P.D. and Carmony, D.D. (1993) Mass-Identified Particle Production in Proton-Anti-proton Collisions at s = 300,540,1000 and 1800 GeV. Physical Review D, 48, 984.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.48.984
[31]  Chatrchyan, S., Khachatryan, V., Sirunyan, A.M., Tumasyan, A., Adam, W., Bergauer, T. and Fruehwirth, R. (2011) Measurement of the Inclusive W and Z Production Cross Sections in pp Collisions at = 7 TeV with the CMS Experiment. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2011, 132.
https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2011)132
[32]  Mitsou, V., FerrerSoria, A., VallsFerrer, J.A., Castillo Giménez, M.V., Cabrera Urbán, S., Fuster Verdú, J.A. and Higón Rodríguez, E. (2011) Charged-Particle Multiplicities in pp Interactions Measured with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC. New Journal of Physics, 13, Article ID: 053033.
[33]  Aad, G., Abat, E., Abbott, B., Abdallah, J., Abdelalim, A.A., Abdes-selam, A. and Abreu, H. (2010) Charged-Particle Multiplicities in pp Interactions at Measured with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC. Physics Letters B, 688, 21-42.
[34]  Kamodt, K., Abel, N., Abeysekara, U., Quintana, A.A., Acero, A., Adamova, D. and Ahammed, Z. (2010) First Proton-Proton Collisions at the LHC as Observed with the ALICE Detector: Measurement of the Charged-Particle Pseudorapidity Density at = 900 GeV. The European Physical Journal C, 65, 111-125.
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1227-4
[35]  Beggio, P.C. and Luna, E.G.S. (2014) Cross Sections, Multiplicity and Moment Distributions at the LHC. Nuclear Physics A, 929, 230-245.
[36]  Beggio, P.C. (2013) Oscillations of Factorial Cumulates to Factorial Moments Ratio from an Eikonal Approach. Nuclear Physics A, 913, 264-275.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus