All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

How Does the Use of Technology and Self-Regulation Activities Predict Mathematical Literacy? An SEM Model Based on PISA2012 in Shanghai

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2016.68111, PP. 864-874

Keywords: ICT,自我调节学习,PISA,数学素养
, Self-Regulated Learning, PISA, Mathematics Literacy

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


This study investigates the relationship between Shanghai students’ mathematics literacy and their use of computers for educational and self-regulated learning, by using the data from PISA2012 in Shanghai. According to Shanghai PISA raw data, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to explore the relationship among the three variables. The study found that the more often use the computer, the students’ mathematical literacy worse; the more students will be self- regulated learning, the better mathematical literacy. Causal link between self-regulation and learning to use computers is significant, but the coefficient is small, which is most likely caused by a large statistical sample.


[1]  PISA台湾研究中心(2012). PISA 数学素养应试指南.
[2]  冯成火(2014). PISA视角下的浙江基础教育——浙江学生在PISA2012试测中的表现及启示. 浙江教育科学, (5), 3-8.
[3]  顾小清(2001). 为了每一个学生的终身发展: 上海教育信息化规划及进展. 电化教育研究, (2), 5-10.
[4]  曲苒(2004). 中学生自我调节学习与学业自我效能感, 成就目标定向及学业成就的关系研究. 硕士论文, 西安: 陕西师范大学.
[5]  余民宁(2006). 潜在变项模式——SIMPLIS的应用(页133-134). 台北市: 高等教育.
[6]  张冬梅(2005). 高中学生自我调节学习与数学思维品质及数学学业成绩的关系研究. 硕士论文, 北京: 首都师范大学.
[7]  祝智庭(2003). 中国基础教育信息化进展报告. 中国电化教育, 9, 6-12.
[8]  Azevedo, R. (2005). Using Hypermedia as a Metacognitive Tool for Enhancing Student Learning? The Role of Self-Regu- lated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 199-209.
[9]  Engin, Z., Dogan, N., & Kelecioglu, H. (2010). What Is the Pre-dict Level of Which Computer Using Skills Measured in PISA for Achievement in Mathematics. TOJET: The Turkish On-line Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 185-191.
[10]  Erba?, K. C. (2005). Factors Affecting Scientific Literacy of Students in Turkey in Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Ankara: Middle East Technical Universi-ty.
[11]  Lajoie, S. P., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Teaching and Learning in Technology-Rich Environments. Handbook of Educational Psychology, 2, 803-821.
[12]  Oblinger, D. (2003). Boomers, Gen-Xers, and Millennials: Understanding the “New Students”. Educause Review, 38, 37-47.
[13]  OECD (2012). About PISA.
[14]  Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 1-2.
[15]  Reed, S. K. (2006). Cognitive Architectures for Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist, 41, 87-98.
[16]  Schraw, G. (2007). The Use of Computer-Based Environments for Understanding and Improving Self-Regulation. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 169-176.
[17]  Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231.
[18]  Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2007). Influencing Children’s Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation of Reading and Writing through Modeling. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23, 7-25.
[19]  Souvignier, E., & Mokhlesgerami, J. (2006). Using Self-Regulation as a Framework for Implementing Strategy Instruction to Foster Reading Comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 16, 57-71.
[20]  Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A Social Cognitive View of Self-Regulated Academic Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329.
[21]  Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 64-70.


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us


微信:OALib Journal