All Title Author
Keywords Abstract


A Set of GRASS GIS-Based Shell Scripts for the Calculation and Graphical Display of the Main Morphometric Parameters of a River Channel

DOI: 10.4236/ijg.2016.72011, PP. 135-143

Keywords: GRASS GIS, Shell Script, River Morphometry

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

For the analysis of river evolution, the use of quantitative parameters can be quite useful in order to assess changes in the channel planform. Among the several parameters proposed by different authors in a number of papers, channel length and width, braiding and sinuosity indexes, and channel lateral shifting are proved to be the most effective ones for a quantitative analysis of river changes. However, the calculation of these parameters is time-consuming, tedious and error-prone, even where made in a GIS environment. This work describes four shell scripts that perform fast and automatic calculation of the morphometric parameters and draw curves showing thevariation of the calculated parameters along the entire channel development. The scripts arebased on commands of the GRASS GIS free and open source software and, as input, they require a simple vector map containing the essential features of a river channel,i.e.bankfull channel limits and longitudinal and lateral bars.

References

[1]  Clerici, A., Perego, S., Chelli, S. and Tellini, C. (2015) Morphological Changes of the Floodplain Reach of the Taro River (Northern Italy) in the Last Two Centuries. Journal of Hydrology, 527, 1106-1122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.063
[2]  GRASS Development Team (2015) GRASS: Geographic Resources Analysis Support System.
http://grass.osgeo.org
[3]  Neteler, M. and Mitasova, H. (2008) Open Source GIS: A GRASS GIS Approach, 3rd Edition, Springer, US. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68574-8
[4]  Fisher, G.B., Bookhagen, B. and Amos, C.B. (2013) Channel Planform Geometry and Slopes from Freely Available High-Spatial Resolution Imagery and DEM Fusion: Implications for Channel Width Scalings, Erosion Proxies, and Fluvial Signatures in Tectonically Active Landscapes. Geomorphology, 194, 46-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.04.011
[5]  Pavelsky, T.M. and Smith, L.C. (2008) RivWidth: A Software Tool for the Calculation of River Widths from Remotely Sensed Imagery. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 5, 70-73.
[6]  Haiyong, L. and Lihong, S. (2009) Double-Line River Axis Extraction Based on Delaunay Triangulation. In: Yaolin, L. and Xinming, T., Eds., Proceeding SPIE 7492, International Symposium on Spatial Analysis, Spatial-Temporal Data Modeling, and Data Mining, Wuhan, China, 13 October 2009.
[7]  Lauer, J.W. (2006) Channel Planform Statistics Toolbox. National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics. Minneapolis, MN 55414. http://www.nced.umn.edu/system/files/PlanformStatisticsTools_0.ppt
[8]  Casagrande, L., Cencetti, C., De Rosa, P., Fredduzzi, A., Martinelli, A. and Minelli, A. (2011) L’Utilizzo dei GFOSS nel Calcolo dell’Indice di Qualità Morfologica (IQM) dei Corsi d’Acqua. Geomatics Workbooks, 10, 57-78. http://geomatica.como.polimi.it/workbooks/n10/GW10-FOSS4Git_2011.pdf
[9]  Thorne, C.R. (1997) Channel Types and Morphological Classification. In: Thorne, C.R., Hey, R.D. and Newson, M.D., Eds., Applied Fluvial Geomorphology for River Engineering and Management, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 175-222.
[10]  Ashmore, P. (1991) Channel Morphology and the Bed Load Pulses in Braided, Gravel-Bed Streams. Geografiska Annaler, 73A, 37-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/521212
[11]  Egozi, R. and Ashmore, P. (2008) Defining and Measuring Braiding Intensity. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 33, 2121-2138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.1658
[12]  Schumm, S.A. (1963) Sinuosity of Alluvial Rivers on the Great Plains. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 74, 1089-1100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1963)74[1089:SOAROT]2.0.CO;2

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus