All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Magnetostrictive Actuation of a Bone Loading Composite for Accelerated Tissue Formation

DOI: 10.1155/2012/258638

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


When bone is dynamically loaded it adapts its shape to better support the load. We have developed a magnetostrictive composite consisting of Terfenol-D particles encapsulated in an epoxy resin that changes length when exposed to magnetic fields. When bonded to the surface of a porcine tibia ex vitro, the composite produces surface strains greater than 900?με at a frequency of 30?Hz and magnetic field of 170?kA/m. This is more than sufficient strain magnitude and frequency to promote cortical bone growth in both rats and turkeys and to maintain cortical bone structure in humans. Key advantages of the composite over conventional electromechanical or thermomechanical actuators are its simplicity, compact size, and remote actuation. A mathematical model describing the strains and stresses in the bone is presented. 1. Introduction Bone structure continuously evolves by building new bone and resorbing old bone [1]. The dynamic property of bone remodeling allows bone tissue to adapt to changes in its loading environment [2]. Although the exact mechanism explaining bone remodeling remains elusive, interstitial fluid flow around a particular subset of bone cells called osteocytes is thought to be essential [3]. Eccentric loading of a long bone creates a bending moment and causes the bone to curve. This creates a region of tension on one side of the bone and a region of compression on the opposite side. As the load is cycled, interstitial fluid flows around osteocytes from regions of compression to regions of tension resulting in shear stress on the cell walls. Shear stress is thought to incite a molecular cascade resulting in new bone growth [4, 5]. In humans, strains below 200?με do not stimulate cortical bone remodeling [6]. Strain values between 200 and 2000?με represent physiological levels of strain on the human skeleton. Above 2000?με, the rate of bone formation exceeds the rate of bone resorption, and growth is observed [7]. Studies involving turkeys have shown that a 30?Hz, 100?με signal is sufficient to maintain bone mass [8], and studies involving rats have shown that a 2?Hz, 930?με signal is sufficient to produce bone growth [9]. Along with strain magnitude, the strain rate plays an important role in new bone formation [10]. Based on a compilation of previous studies where animal bones were subjected to mechanical loads in vivo, Turner [11] and Burr et al. [12] concluded that the strain rate and magnitude are related to the strain stimulus by where is the strain stimulus, is a proportionality constant, is the strain magnitude, and is the strain


[1]  A. G. Robling, A. B. Castillo, and C. H. Turner, “Biomechanical and molecular regulation of bone remodeling,” Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 455–498, 2006.
[2]  P. J. Ehrlich and L. E. Lanyon, “Mechanical strain and bone cell function: a review,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 688–700, 2002.
[3]  E. M. Aarden, E. H. Burger, and P. J. Nijweide, “Function of osteocytes in bone,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 287–299, 1994.
[4]  C. H. Turner, M. R. Forwood, and M. W. Otter, “Mechanotransduction in bone: do bone cells act as sensors of fluid flow?” The FASEB Journal, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 875–878, 1994.
[5]  C. H. Turner and F. M. Pavalko, “Mechanotransduction and functional response of the skeleton to physical stress: the mechanisms and mechanics of bone adaptation,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 346–355, 1998.
[6]  H. M. Frost, “A proposed pathogenically adaptive bone remodeling,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 2, pp. 73–85, 1987.
[7]  K. Khan, H. McKay, P. Kannus, D. Bailey, J. Wark, and K. Bennell, Physical Activity and Bone Health, Human Kinetics, Champaign, Ill, USA, 2001.
[8]  Y. X. Qin, C. T. Rubin, and K. J. McLeod, “Nonlinear dependence of loading intensity and cycle number in the maintenance of bone mass and morphology,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 482–489, 1998.
[9]  C. H. Turner, M. R. Forwood, J. Y. Rho, and T. Yoshikawa, “Mechanical loading thresholds for lamellar and woven bone formation,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 87–97, 1994.
[10]  J. R. Mosley and L. E. Lanyon, “Strain rate as a controlling influence on adaptive modeling in response to dynamic loading of the ulna in growing male rats,” Bone, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 313–318, 1998.
[11]  C. H. Turner, “Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli,” Bone, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 399–407, 1998.
[12]  D. B. Burr, A. G. Robling, and C. H. Turner, “Effects of biomechanical stress on bones in animals,” Bone, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 781–786, 2002.
[13]  Y. F. Hsieh and C. H. Turner, “Effects of loading frequency on mechanically induced bone formation,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 918–924, 2001.
[14]  M. J. Dapino, “On magnetostrictive materials and their use in adaptive structures,” Structural Engineering and Mechanics, vol. 17, no. 3-4, pp. 303–329, 2004.
[15]  N. Nersessian, S. W. Or, and G. P. Carman, “Magneto-thermo-mechanical characterization of 1–3 type polymer-bonded Terfenol-D composites,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 263, no. 1-2, pp. 101–112, 2003.
[16]  T. A. Duenas and G. P. Carman, “Particle distribution study for low-volume fraction magnetostrictive composites,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 2433–2439, 2001.
[17]  K. Choi, L. J. Kuhn, M. J. Ciarelli, and S. A. Goldstein, “The elastic moduli of human subchondral, trabecular, and cortical bone tissue and the size-dependency of cortical bone modulus,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1103–1113, 1990.
[18]  X. Dong, M. Qi, X. Guan, and J. Ou, “Microstructure analysis of magnetostrictive composites,” Polymer Testing, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 369–374, 2010.
[19]  E. F. Morgan, R. E. Gleason, L. N. M. Hayward, P. L. Leong, and K. T. Salisbury Palomares, “Mechanotransduction and fracture repair,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 90, supplement 1, pp. 25–30, 2008.
[20]  J. Charnley, “Anchorage of the femoral head prosthesis to the shaft of the femur,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B, vol. 42, pp. 28–30, 1960.
[21]  R. T. Hockenbury, M. Gruttadauria, and I. McKinney, “Use of implantable bone growth stimulation in charcot ankle arthrodesis,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 971–976, 2007.
[22]  A. Saxena, L. A. DiDomenico, A. Widtfeldt, T. Adams, and W. Kim, “Implantable electrical bone stimulation for arthrodeses of the foot and ankle in high-risk patients: a multicenter study,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 450–454, 2005.
[23]  P. Sharke, “The machinery of life,” Mechanical Engineering, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 30–34, 2004.


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us


微信:OALib Journal