All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

财贸经济  2014 

承接跨国外包对我国生产率的动态影响

, PP. 94-104

Keywords: 跨国外包,全球价值链,生产率

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文基于价值链内厂商间关系考察了跨国外包强度和跨国外包方式分别对当地企业生产率变动的动态作用机制。在以杭州、宁波、湖州、温州等四个地市396家企业调研数据为样本的实证研究中,发现跨国外包强度与生产率之间具有显著的倒U型关系。将跨国外包方式分为价值链驱动模式和价值链治理方式之后,研究发现价值链驱动模式对当地企业生产率的影响存在不确定性,而价值链治理方式对生产率的影响却是显著的:随着跨国公司对当地企业控制程度的提高,生产率有着不同程度的下降趋势。研究结论意味着我国当地企业通过跨国外包获取一定的技术能力之后,积极发展自主技术才是适宜的发展路径。

References

[1]  1.刘志彪:《中国贸易量增长与本土产业的升级——基于全球价值链的治理视角》, 《学术月刊》2007年第2期。
[2]  2.盛斌、牛蕊:《贸易、劳动力需求弹性与就业风险:中国工业的经验研究》, 《世界经济》2009年第6期。
[3]  3.王茜:《中国制造业是否应向“微笑曲线”两端攀爬——基于与制造业传统强国的比较分析》, 《财贸经济》2013年第8期。
[4]  4.徐毅、张二震:《外包与生产率:基于工业行业数据的经验研究》, 《经济研究》2008年第1期。
[5]  5.姚战琪:《工业和服务外包对中国工业生产率的影响》, 《经济研究》2010年第7期。
[6]  6.杨桂菊:《代工企业转型升级:演进路径的理论模型——基于3家本土企业的案例研究》, 《管理世界》2010年第6期。
[7]  7.张少军、刘志彪:《国际贸易与内资企业的产业升级——来自全球价值链的组织与治理力量》, 《财贸经济》2013年第2期。
[8]  8.Bernard, A., Jensen, J.B., Exceptional Export Performance:Case, Effect, or Both? Journal of International Economics, Vol.47, No.1, 1999, pp.1-25.
[9]  9.Clerides, S., Lach, S., Tybout, J., Is Learning by Exporting Important? Micro-Dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.113, No.3, 1998, pp.903-947.
[10]  10.Feenstra, R.C., Hanson, G.H., The Impact of Outsourcing and High-Technology Capital on Wages: Estimates for the United States, 1979-1990.Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.114, No.3, 1999, pp.907-941.
[11]  11.Gereffi, G., International Trade and Industrial Upgrading in the Apparel Commodity Chain.Journal of International Economics, Vol.48, No.1, 1999, pp.37-70.
[12]  12.Griliches, Z., Mairesse, J., R&D and Productivity Growth: Comparing Japanese and U.S.Manufacturing Firms.In Charles, H.(eds.), Productivity Growth in Japan and United States.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990, pp.317-340.
[13]  13.Hall, R., Jones, C., Why do Some Countries Produce so much more Output per Worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.114, No.1, 1999, pp.83-116.
[14]  14.Head, K., Ries, J., Heterogeneity and the FDI versus Export Decision of Japanese Manufacturers.NBER Working Paper, No.10052, 2003.
[15]  15.Ivarsson, I., Alvstam, C.G., Supplier Upgrading in the Home-Furnishing Value Chain: An Empirical Study of IKEA's Sourcing in China and South East Asia.World Development, Vol.38, No.11, 2010, pp.1575-1587.
[16]  16.Kumar, N., Aggarwal, A., Liberalization, Outward Orientation and in-house R&D Activity of Multinational and Local Firms: A Quantitative Exploration for Indian Manufacturing.Research Policy, Vol.34, No.4, 2005, pp.441-460.
[17]  17.Pietrobelli, C., Saliola, F., Power Relationships along the Value Chain:Multinational Firm, Global Buyers, and Performance of Local Suppliers.Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol.32, No.6, 2008, pp.947-962.
[18]  18.Saliola, F., Zanfei, A., Multinational Firms, Global Value Chains and the Organization of Knowledge Transfer.Research Policy, Vol.38, No.2, 2009, pp.369-381.
[19]  19.Schmitz, H., Knorringa, P., Learning from Global Buyers.Journal of Development Studies, Vol.37, No.2, 2000, pp.177-205.
[20]  20.Tokatli, N., Asymmetrical Power Relations and Upgrading among Suppliers of Global Clothing Brands:Hugo Boss in Turkey. Journal of Economic Geography, Vol.7, No.1, 2007, pp.67-92.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

微信:OALib Journal