道德情绪对道德判断能力的影响
The Effect of Moral Emotion on Moral Judgment Capacity

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2014.47126, PP. 980-987

Keywords: 道德情绪，道德判断能力，MJT
Moral Emotion, Moral Judgment Capacity, MJT

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本实验进行了两次测试，前测选取了网络热议或大学生生活中较典型的道德故事，对其进行前后测后，筛选出其中能诱发相应情绪的道德故事。正式实验中，情绪启动之后，测量被试的情绪状态，运用MJT对大学生进行道德判断能力测验。实验发现：积极情绪条件下道德判断能力显著低于控制组，控制组显著低于消极情绪组；不同的积极情绪条件下道德判断能力差异不显著；不同的消极情绪条件下差异不显著；男性的显著大于女性；大四的明显大于大一，其他年级之间差异不显著。
This study conducted two tests. The pretest selected apologue popular on the Internat and typical in college students’ life. After pre-post test, the apologue which could induce corresponding emo- tions was screened out. In the formal test, after affective priming, subjects’ emotional state was measured, and MJT was used to test the moral judgment capacity of college students. It was found that the moral judgment capacity in the positive mood condition was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the moral judgment capacity in the control group was significantly lower than that in the negative mood group; the differences of the moral judgment capacity were not significant in different positive emotional conditions and also in different negative emotional conditions; the differences of the moral judgment capacity of males were more significant than those of females; the differences of senior students were more significant than those of freshmen, and were not significant in other grades.

References

[1]	杨韶刚, 吴慧红(2006). 青少年道德判断能力的研究. 心理学探新, 2期, 55-60.
[2]	周详, 杨治良, 郝雁丽(2007). 理性学习的局限. 道德情绪理论对道德养成的启示. 道德与文明, 3期, 57-60.
[3]	庄锦英(2003). 情绪与决策的关系. 心理科学进展, 4期, 423-443.
[4]	Fataneh, Z., Martin, C., & Stephanie, M. (2000). The effects of happiness and sadness on moral reasoning. Journal of Mora. Education, 29, 397-412.
[5]	Greene, J. (2007). Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 322-323.
[6]	Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., & Nystrom, L. E. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105-2108.
[7]	Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 517-523.
[8]	Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834.
[9]	Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998-1001.
[10]	McCullough, M. E., Kilpatrick, S. D., Emmons, R. A., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Is gratitude a moral affect? Psychological Bulletin, 127, 249-266.
[11]	Nichols, S. & Mallon, R. (2006). Moral dilemmas and moral rules. Cognition, 100, 530-542.
[12]	Nichols, S. (2002). How psychopaths threaten moral rationalism, or are it irrational to be amoral. The Monist, 85, 285-303.
[13]	Pizarro, D. (2000). Nothing more than feeling? The role of emotions in moral judgment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 30, 355-375.
[14]	Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345-372.
[15]	Van den Bos, K. (2003). On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 482-498.

Full-Text