| [1] | Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating Research Questions through Problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36, 247-271.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.59330882
|
| [2] | Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Constructing Research Questions: Doing Interesting Research. London: Sage.
|
| [3] | Bacchi, C. (1999). Women, Policy and Politics: The Construction of Policy Problems. London: Sage.
|
| [4] | Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be? Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education.
|
| [5] | Bacchi, C. (2012). Why Study Problematization? Making Politics Visible. Open Journal of Political Science, 2, 1-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2012.21001
|
| [6] | Bacchi, C., & Rönnblom, M. (2014). Feminist Discursive Institutionalism—A Poststructural Alternative. NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 22, 170-186.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2013.864701?
|
| [7] | Burr, V. (2003). Social Constructionism (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
|
| [8] | Callon, M. (2009). Civilizing Markets: Carbon Trading between in Vitro and in Vivo Experiments. Accounting, Organization and Society, 34, 535-548.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.04.003
|
| [9] | Colebatch, H. (2010). Giving Accounts of Policy. In H. Colebatch, R. Hoppe, & M. Noordegraaf (Eds.), Working for Policy (pp. 31-43). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5117/9789089642530
|
| [10] | Colebatch, H., Hoppe, R., & Noordegraaf, M. (2010a). Preface. In H. Colebatch, R. Hoppe, & M. Noordegraaf (Eds.), Working for Policy (pp. 8-9). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
|
| [11] | Colebatch, H., Hoppe, R., & Noordegraaf, M. (2010b). The Lessons for Policy Work. In H. Colebatch, R. Hoppe, & M. Noordegraaf (Eds.), Working for Policy (pp. 227-245). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
|
| [12] | Colebatch, H., Hoppe, R., & Noordegraaf, M. (Eds.). (2010). Working for Policy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5117/9789089642530
|
| [13] | Dean, M., & Hindess, B. (1998). Governing Australia: Studies in Contemporary Rationalities of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
| [14] | Dery, D. (1984). Problem Definition in Policy Analysis. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
|
| [15] | Eribon, D. (1991). Michel Foucault. London: Faber and Faber.
|
| [16] | Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.
|
| [17] | Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis and Critical Policy Studies. Critical Policy Studies, 7, 177-197.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2013.798239
|
| [18] | Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/019924264X.001.0001
|
| [19] | Fischer, F., & Gottweis, H. (Eds.) (2012). The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822395362
|
| [20] | Fischer, F., & Mandell, A. (2012). Transformative Learning in Planning and Policy Deliberation: Probing Social Meaning and Tacit Assumptions. In F. Fischer, & H. Gottweis (Eds.), The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice (pp. 343-370). Durham: Duke University Press.
|
| [21] | Flynn, T. (2005). Sartre, Foucault, and Historical Reason: A Poststructuralist Mapping of History Vol. II. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226254722.001.0001
|
| [22] | Foucault, M. (1969). Pamphlet Submitted to Professors of the Collège de France. Cited in D. Eribon (1991) Michel Foucault (pp. 214-216). B. Wing (Trans.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
|
| [23] | Foucault, M. (1984a). What Is Enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault Reader (pp. 32-50). New York: Pantheon Books.
|
| [24] | Foucault, M. (1984b). A propos de la généalogie de l’éthique: Un apercu du travail en cours (Rewritten Version). Dits et Ecrits. Tome II (1994) (pp. 1428-1450). Paris: Gallimard.
|
| [25] | Foucault, M. (1986). The Use of Pleasure: The History of Sexuality Vol. II. New York: Vintage.
|
| [26] | Foucault, M. (1994) [1981]. So Is It Important to Think? In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984 (Vol. 3, pp. 454-458). Trans. R. Hurley and Others, London: Penguin.
|
| [27] | Foucault, M. (2009). History of Madness. Trans. J. Khalfa. New York: Routledge.
|
| [28] | Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury.
|
| [29] | Freire, P. (1973). Education for Critical Consciousness. New York: Seabury.
|
| [30] | Glynos, J., & Howarth, D. (2007). Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge.
|
| [31] | Glynos, J., Howarth, D., Norval, A., & Speed, E. (2009). Discourse Analysis: Varieties and Methods. Colchester: Centre for Theoretical Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Essex. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods; NCRM/014.
|
| [32] | Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 1-52). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
|
| [33] | Hoppe, R. (1999). Policy Analysis, Science, and Politics: From “Speaking Truth to Power” to “Making Sense Together”. Science and Public Policy, 26, 201-210.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782482
|
| [34] | Hoppe, R. (2002). Cultures of Public Policy Problems. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 4, 305-326.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13876980208412685
|
| [35] | Hoppe, R. (2011). The Governance of Problems: Puzzling, Power and Participation. Bristol: Policy Press.
|
| [36] | Howarth, D. (2013). Poststructuralism and After: Structure, Subjectivity and Power. Houndmills: Palgrave.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137266989
|
| [37] | Howarth, D., & Griggs, S. (2012). Poststructuralist Policy Analysis: Discourse, Hegemony, and Critical Explanation. In F. Fischer, & H. Gottweis (Eds.), The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice (pp. 305-342). Durham: Duke University Press.
|
| [38] | Howarth, D., Norval, A., & Stavrakakis, Y. (Eds.) (2000). Discourse Theory and Political Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
|
| [39] | Jones, A. (1997). Teaching Post-Structuralist Feminist Theory in Education: Student Resistances. Gender and Education, 9, 261-269.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540259721240
|
| [40] | Koopman, C. (2011). Foucault and Pragmatism: Introductory Notes on Metaphilosophical Methodology. Foucault Studies, 11, 2-10.
|
| [41] | Koopman, C. (2013). Genealogy as Critique: Foucault and the Problems of Modernity. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
|
| [42] | Osborne, T. (1997). On Health and Statecraft. In A. Petersen, & R. Bunton (Eds.), Foucault, Health and Medicine (pp. 173-188). London: Routledge.
|
| [43] | Rabinow, P. (2012). How to Submit to Inquiry: Dewey and Foucault. The Pluralist, 7, 25-37.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5406/pluralist.7.3.0025
|
| [44] | Rose, N. (2000). Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought (1st ed., 1999). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
| [45] | Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government. The British Journal of Sociology, 43, 173-205.
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=00071315%28199206%2943%
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/591464
|
| [46] | Sch?n, D. A. (1983). The Reflexive Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic.
|
| [47] | Shapiro, I. (2002). Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What’s Wrong with Political Science and What to Do about It. Political Theory, 30, 596-619.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3072623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0090591702030004008
|
| [48] | Tanesini, A. (1994). Whose Language? In K. Lennon, & M. Whitford (Eds.), Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Epistemology (pp. 203-216). New York: Routledge.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203216125_chapter_13
|
| [49] | Thompson, K. (2010). Response to Colin Koopman’s “Historical Critique or Transcendental Critique in Foucault: Two Kantian Lineages”. Foucault Studies, 8, 122-128.
|
| [50] | Turnbull, N. (2005). Policy in Question: From Problem Solving to Problematology. Sydney: University of New South Wales.
|
| [51] | Turnbull, N. (2006). How Should We Theorize Public Policy? Problem Solving and Problematicity. Policy and Society, 25, 3-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1449-4035(06)70072-8
|
| [52] | Turnbull, N. (2007). Introduction: Problematology: A New Paradigm for Thought. Revue internationale de philosophie, 4, 349-352.
|
| [53] | Turnbull, N. (2008). Legitimation in Terms of Questioning: Integrating Political Rhetoric and Sociology of Law. Workshop on Normative and Sociological Approaches to Legality and Legitimacy, O?ati, 24-25 April 2008, 1-29.
www.dcern.org.uk/documents/TurnbullLegitimation.pdf
|
| [54] | Turnbull, N. (2014). Michael Meyer’s Problematology: Questioning and Society. London: Bloomsbury.
|
| [55] | Webb, P. T. (2014). Policy Problematization. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27, 364-376.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2012.762480
|
| [56] | Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist Practice and Post-Structuralist Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
|
| [57] | Wildavsky, A. (1979). The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. London: Macmillan.
|
