All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Loss to Followup in HIV-Infected Patients from Asia-Pacific Region: Results from TAHOD

DOI: 10.1155/2012/375217

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


This study examined characteristics of HIV-infected patients in the TREAT Asia HIV Observational Database who were lost to follow-up (LTFU) from treatment and care. Time from last clinic visit to 31 March 2009 was analysed to determine the interval that best classified LTFU. Patients defined as LTFU were then categorised into permanently LTFU (never returned) and temporary LTFU (re-entered later), and these groups compared. A total of 3626 patients were included (71% male). No clinic visits for 180 days was the best-performing LTFU definition (sensitivity 90.6%, specificity 92.3%). During 7697 person-years of follow-up, 1648 episodes of LFTU were recorded (21.4 per 100-person-years). Patients LFTU were younger ( ), had HIV viral load ≥500?copies/mL or missing ( ), had shorter history of HIV infection ( ), and received no, single- or double-antiretroviral therapy, or a triple-drug regimen containing a protease inhibitor ( ). 48% of patients LTFU never returned. These patients were more likely to have low or missing haemoglobin ( ), missing recent HIV viral load ( ), negative hepatitis C test ( ), and previous temporary LTFU episodes ( ). Our analyses suggest that patients not seen at a clinic for 180 days are at high risk of permanent LTFU, and should be aggressively traced. 1. Introduction Loss to followup (LTFU) in patients receiving antiretroviral therapy can cause serious consequences such as discontinuation of treatment and increased risk of death [1–3]. At a program level, LTFU can make it difficult to evaluate outcomes of treatment and care [4, 5]. In resource-limited settings, where treatment has become rapidly available following the rollout of antiretroviral therapy, LTFU presents even more challenging obstacles that require special consideration and approaches [6, 7]. One of the key questions in patient followup is how to define a patient as LTFU. This has varied in studies conducted in different settings [8–10]. Defining LTFU using a very early threshold, for example, a patient with no clinic visit in the last three months, may result in many patients being considered as LTFU who would return to clinic naturally at a later date. Defining LTFU with a long threshold, for example, one year, may mean delaying too long before any effort is made to track patients potentially at risk of LTFU. The majority of research into LTFU in HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral treatment in resource-limited settings has been conducted in the sub-Saharan Africa region [3, 10–13]. A few studies have been conducted among Asian, mostly female, patients


[1]  R. P. Dalal, C. MacPhail, M. Mqhayi et al., “Characteristics and outcomes of adult patients lost to follow-up at an antiretroviral treatment clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 101–107, 2008.
[2]  A. T. Brennan, M. Maskew, I. Sanne, and M. P. Fox, “The importance of clinic attendance in the first six months on antiretroviral treatment: a retrospective analysis at a large public sector HIV clinic in South Africa,” Journal of the International AIDS Society, vol. 13, no. 1, article 49, 2010.
[3]  H. Bygrave, K. Kranzer, K. Hilderbrand et al., “Trends in loss to follow-up among migrant workers on antiretroviral therapy in a community cohort in Lesotho,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 10, Article ID e13198, 2010.
[4]  M. W. G. Brinkhof, B. D. Spycher, C. Yiannoutsos et al., “Adjusting mortality for loss to follow-up: analysis of five art programmes in sub-saharan africa,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 11, Article ID e14149, 2010.
[5]  M. W. G. Brinkhof, M. Pujades-Rodriguez, and M. Egger, “Mortality of patients lost to follow-up in antiretroviral treatment programmes in resource-limited settings: systematic review and meta-analysis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 6, Article ID e5790, 2009.
[6]  B. H. Chi, R. A. Cantrell, A. Mwango et al., “An empirical approach to defining loss to follow-up among patients enrolled in antiretroviral treatment programs,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 171, no. 8, pp. 924–931, 2010.
[7]  M. Egger, B. D. Spycher, J. Sidle et al., “Correcting mortality for loss to follow-up: a nomogram applied to antiretroviral treatment programmes in sub-Saharan Africa,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, article e1000390, 2011.
[8]  K. Wools-Kaloustian, S. Kimaiyo, L. Diero et al., “Viability and effectiveness of large-scale HIV treatment initiatives in sub-Saharan Africa: experience from western Kenya,” AIDS, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 41–48, 2006.
[9]  P. Braitstein, M. W. Brinkhof, F. Dabis, et al., “Mortality of HIV-1-infected patients in the first year of antiretroviral therapy: comparison between low-income and high-income countries,” The Lancet, vol. 367, no. 9513, pp. 817–824, 2006.
[10]  B. Wang, E. Losina, R. Stark et al., “Loss to follow-up in a community clinic in South Africa-roles of gender, pregnancy and CD4 count,” South African Medical Journal, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 253–257, 2011.
[11]  V. Ochieng-Ooko, D. Ochieng, J. E. Sidle et al., “Influence of gender on loss to follow-up in a large HIV treatment programme in western kenya,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 88, no. 9, pp. 681–688, 2010.
[12]  R. Weigel, M. Hochgesang, M. W.G. Brinkhof et al., “Outcomes and associated risk factors of patients traced after being lost to follow-up from antiretroviral treatment in Lilongwe, Malawi,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 11, article 31, 2011.
[13]  O. Keiser, B. H. Chi, T. Gsponer et al., “Outcomes of antiretroviral treatment in programmes with and without routine viral load monitoring in southern Africa,” AIDS, vol. 25, no. 14, pp. 1761–1769, 2011.
[14]  S. Thai, O. Koole, P. Un et al., “Five-year experience with scaling-up access to antiretroviral treatment in an HIV care programme in Cambodia,” Tropical Medicine and International Health, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1048–1058, 2009.
[15]  P. L. Toro, M. Katyal, R. J. Carter et al., “Initiation of antiretroviral therapy among pregnant women in resource-limited countries: CD4+ cell count response and program retention,” AIDS, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 515–524, 2010.
[16]  M. Panditrao, S. Darak, V. Kulkarni, S. Kulkarni, and R. Parchure, “Socio-demographic factors associated with loss to follow-up of HIV-infected women attending a private sector PMTCT program in Maharashtra, India,” AIDS Care, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 593–600, 2011.
[17]  J. Zhou, N. Kumarasamy, F. Zhang et al., “Predicting short-term disease progression among HIV-infected patients in Asia and the Pacific region: preliminary results from the TREAT Asia HIV Observational Database (TAHOD),” HIV Medicine, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 216–223, 2005.
[18]  T. Hill, L. Bansi, C. Sabin et al., “Data linkage reduces loss to follow-up in an observational HIV cohort study,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 1101–1109, 2010.
[19]  M. W. G. Brinkhof, F. Dabis, L. Myer et al., “Early loss of HIV-infected patients on potent antiretroviral therapy programmes in lower-income countries,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 86, no. 7, pp. 559–567, 2008.
[20]  E. H. Geng, N. Emenyonu, M. B. Bwana, D. V. Glidden, and J. N. Martin, “Sampling-based approach to determining outcomes of patients lost to follow-up in antiretroviral therapy scale-up programs in Africa,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 300, no. 5, pp. 506–507, 2008.
[21]  C. Cesar, B. E. Shepherd, A. J. Krolewiecki et al., “Rates and reasons for early change of first HAART in HIV-1-infected patients in 7 sites throughout the Caribbean and Latin America,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 6, Article ID e10490, 2010.
[22]  B. H. Chi, C. T. Yiannoutsos, A. O. Westfall et al., “Universal definition of loss to follow-up in HIV treatment programs: a statistical analysis of 111 facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 8, no. 10, article e1001111, 2011.
[23]  A. Mocroft, O. Kirk, P. Aldins et al., “Loss to follow-up in an international, multicentre observational study,” HIV Medicine, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 261–269, 2008.
[24]  R. Zachariah, K. Tayler-Smith, M. Manzi et al., “Retention and attrition during the preparation phase and after start of antiretroviral treatment in Thyolo, Malawi, and Kibera, Kenya: implications for programmes?” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 105, no. 8, pp. 421–430, 2011.
[25]  T. Hill, L. Bansi, C. Sabin et al., “Data linkage reduces loss to follow-up in an observational HIV cohort study,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 1101–1109, 2010.
[26]  A. Mocroft, O. Kirk, P. Aldins et al., “Loss to follow-up in an international, multicentre observational study,” HIV Medicine, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 261–269, 2008.
[27]  J. D. Lundgren and A. Mocroft, “Anemia and survival in human immunodeficiency virus,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. s297–s303, 2003.
[28]  C. T. Yiannoutsos, M. W. An, C. E. Frangakis et al., “Sampling-based approaches to improve estimation of mortality among patient dropouts: experience from a large PEPFAR-funded program in Western Kenya,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 12, Article ID e3843, 2008.
[29]  M. Bedelu, N. Ford, K. Hilderbrand, and H. Reuter, “Implementing antiretroviral therapy in rural communities: the Lusikisiki model of decentralized HIV/AIDS care,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 196, no. 3, pp. S464–S468, 2007.
[30]  A. K. Chan, G. Mateyu, A. Jahn et al., “Outcome assessment of decentralization of antiretroviral therapy provision in a rural district of Malawi using an integrated primary care model,” Tropical Medicine and International Health, vol. 15, supplement 1, pp. 90–97, 2010.
[31]  E. H. Geng, D. R. Bangsberg, N. Musinguzi et al., “Understanding reasons for and outcomes of patients lost to follow-up in antiretroviral therapy programs in Africa through a sampling-based approach,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 405–411, 2010.
[32]  M. Maskew, P. MacPhail, C. Menezes, and D. Rubel, “Lost to follow up—contributing factors and challenges in South African patients on antiretroviral therapy,” South African Medical Journal, vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 853–857, 2007.
[33]  N. C. Ware, J. Idoko, S. Kaaya et al., “Explaining adherence success in sub-Saharan Africa: an ethnographic study,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 6, no. 1, Article ID e1000011, pp. 0039–0047, 2009.
[34]  E. H. Geng, D. Nash, A. Kambugu et al., “Retention in care among HIV-infected patients in resource-limited settings: emerging insights and new directions,” Current HIV/AIDS Reports, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 234–244, 2010.
[35]  B. Amuron, G. Namara, J. Birungi et al., “Mortality and loss-to-follow-up during the pre-treatment period in an antiretroviral therapy programme under normal health service conditions in Uganda,” BMC Public Health, vol. 9, article 290, 2009.
[36]  T. Togun, I. Peterson, S. Jaffar et al., “Pre-treatment mortality and loss-to-follow-up in HIV-1, HIV-2 and HIV-1/HIV-2 dually infected patients eligible for antiretroviral therapy in The Gambia, West Africa,” AIDS Research and Therapy, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 24, 2011.


comments powered by Disqus