This paper
aims to compare between OSPFv2 and OSPFv3, to explain the impact of the change
in OSPFv3 packet format and the over load when OSPFv3 uses IPv6 packet instead
of IPv4 packet format that was used by OSPFv2, and the comparison based on
common OSPF packets that was sent in the same network.
References
[1]
S.G. Thorenoor (2010) Communication Service Provider’s Choice between OSPF and IS-IS Dynamic Routing Protocols and Implementation Criteria Using OPNET Simulator. Second International Conference on Computer and Network Technology, Bangkok, 23-25 April 2010, 38-42.
[2]
Jasika, N., Alispahic, N., Elma, A., Ilvana, K., Elma, L. and Nosovic, N. (2012) Dijkstra’s Shortest Path Algorithm Serial and Parallel Execution Performance Analysis. MIPRO, Opatija, 21-25 May 2012, 1811-1815.
[3]
Perez, M.H. and Santiago, A.M. (2006) Process of Migration of Routing Protocols in a LAN: RIP to OSPF. 3rd International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Veracruz, 6-8 September 2006, 1-5.
[4]
Zhou, H.J., Pan, J. and Shen, P.B. (2003) Cost Adaptive OSPF. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications (ICCIMA’03), Xi’an, 27-30 September 2003, 55-60.
[5]
Celik, F. and Zengin, A. (2013) Discrete Event Simulation-Based Performance Evaluation of Internet Routing Protocols. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, 21, 1720-1736.
[6]
Wijaya, C. (2011) Performance Analysis of Dynamic Routing Protocol EIGRP and OSPF in IPv4 and IPv6 Network. First International Conference on Informatics and Computational Intelligence, Bandung, 12-14 December 2011, 355- 360.
[7]
Chen, H.H. and Sun, X.L. (2013) Simulation and Research of OSPFv3 Performance. International Conference on Computational and Information Sciences, Shiyang, 21-23 June 2013, 1901-1903.
[8]
Shirkar, A. (2013) Comparing OSPFv3 & OSPFv2 Routing Protocol. https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-23905
