全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

New ?eby?ev Type Inequalities and Applications for Functions of Self-Adjoint Operators on Complex Hilbert Spaces

DOI: 10.1155/2014/363050

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Several new error bounds for the ?eby?ev functional under various assumptions are proved. Applications for functions of self-adjoint operators on complex Hilbert spaces are provided as well. 1. Introduction In recent years the approximation problem of the Riemann-Stieltjes integral via the famous ?eby?ev functional increasingly became essential. In 1882, ?eby?ev [1] derived an interesting result involving two absolutely continuous functions whose first derivatives are continuous and bounded and is given by and the constant is the best possible. In 1935, Grüss [2] proved another result for two integrable mappings , such that and ; the inequality holds, and the constant is the best possible. In [3, p 302] Beesack et al. have proved the following ?eby?ev inequality for absolutely continuous functions whose first derivatives belong to spaces: where , , and . For the constant we have for all , . Furthermore, we have the following particular cases in (4).(1)If , we have (2)If , we have In 1970, Ostrowski [4] has proved the following combination of the ?eby?ev and Grüss results: where is absolutely continuous with and is Lebesgue integrable on and satisfying , for all . The constant is the best possible. In 1973, Lupa? [5] has improved Beesack et al. inequality (7), as follows: provided that , are two absolutely continuous functions on with , where . The constant is the best possible. More recently, and using the identity ([3], page 246), Dragomir [6] has proved the following inequality. Theorem 1. Let be of bounded variation on and a Lebesgue integrable function on ; then where denotes the total variation of on the interval . The constant is best possible in (12). Another result when both functions are of bounded variation was considered in the same paper [6], as follows. Theorem 2. If are of bounded variation on , then The constant is best possible in (13). Many authors have studied the functional (1) and, therefore, several bounds under various assumptions have been obtained; for more new results and generalizations the reader may refer to [6–21]. On other hand and in order to study the difference between two Riemann integral means, Barnett et al. [22] have proved the following estimates. Theorem 3. Let be an absolutely continuous function with the property that ; that is, Then for , we have the inequality The constant in the first inequality and in the second inequality are the best possible. After that, Cerone and Dragomir [23] have obtained the following three results as well. Theorem 4. Let be an absolutely continuous mapping. Then for , we have the

References

[1]  P. L. ?eby?ev, “Sur les expressions approximatives des intègrals dèfinis par les outres prises entre les même limites,” Proceedings of the Mathematical Society of Kharkov, vol. 2, pp. 93–98, 1882.
[2]  G. Grüss, “über das Maximum des absoluten Betrages von ,” Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 215–226, 1935.
[3]  D. S. Mitrinovi?, J. E. Pe?ari?, and A. M. Fink, Classical and New Inequalities in Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1993.
[4]  A. M. Ostrowski, “On an integral inequality,” Aequationes Mathematicae, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 358–373, 1970.
[5]  A. Lupa?, “The best constant in an integral inequality,” Mathematica, vol. 15, no. 38, pp. 219–222, 1973.
[6]  S. S. Dragomir, “New Grüss' type inequalities for functions of bounded variation and applications,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1475–1479, 2012.
[7]  M. W. Alomari, “Some Grüss type inequalities for Riemann-Stieltjes integral and applications,” Acta Mathematica Universitatis Comenianae, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 211–220, 2012.
[8]  M. W. Alomari and S. S. Dragomir, “Mercer-Trapezoid rule for Riemann-Stieltjes integral with applications,” Journal of Advances in Mathematics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 67–85, 2013.
[9]  M. W. Alomari, “A companion of Ostrowski's inequality for the Riemann-Stieltjes integral , where is of bounded variation and is of - -H?lder type and applications,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 219, no. 9, pp. 4792–4799, 2013.
[10]  M. W. Alomari, “Difference between two Stieltjes integral means,” Kragujevac Journal of Mathematics. In press.
[11]  M. W. Alomari, “A sharp bound for the ?eby?ev functional of convex or concave functions,” Chinese Journal of Mathematics, vol. 2013, Article ID 295146, 3 pages, 2013.
[12]  M. W. Alomari, “New sharp inequalities of Ostrowski and generalized trapezoid type for the Riemann–Stieltjes integrals and applications,” Ukrainian Mathematical Journal, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 995–1018, 2013.
[13]  M. W. Alomari, “New Grüss type inequalities for double integrals,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 228, pp. 102–107, 2014.
[14]  M. W. Alomari and S. S. Dragomir, “New Grüss type inequalities for Riemann-Stieltjes integral with monotonic integrators and applications,” Annals of Functional Analysis, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 77–93, 2014.
[15]  M. W. Alomari and S. S. Dragomir, “Some Grüss type inequalities for the Riemann–Stieltjes integral with Lipschitzian integrators,” Konuralp Journal of Mathematics. In press.
[16]  S. S. Dragomir, “A generalisation of Cerone's identity and applications,” Tamsui Oxford Journal of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 79–90, 2007.
[17]  S. S. Dragomir, “Inequalities for Stieltjes integrals with convex integrators and applications,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 123–130, 2007.
[18]  S. S. Dragomir, “Accurate approximations of the Riemann-Stieltjes integral with (l,L)-Lipschitzian integrators,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 936, no. 1, p. 686, 2007.
[19]  S. S. Dragomir, “Sharp Grüss-type inequalities for functions whose derivatives are of bounded variation,” Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 4, article 117, 2007.
[20]  S. S. Dragomir, “Bounds for some perturbed ?eby?ev functionals,” Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 3, article 64, 2008.
[21]  B. G. Pachpatte, “On ?eby?ev type inequalities involving functions whose derivatives belong to spaces,” Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 7, no. 2, article 58, 2006.
[22]  N. S. Barnett, P. Cerone, S. S. Dragomir, and A. M. Fink, “Comparing two integral means for absolutely continuous mappings whose derivatives are in and applications,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 241–251, 2002.
[23]  P. Cerone and S. S. Dragomir, “Differences between Means with Bounds from a Riemann-Stieltjes Integral,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 46, no. 2-3, pp. 445–453, 2003.
[24]  G. Helmberg, Introduction to Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1969.
[25]  S. S. Dragomir, “Some trapezoidal vector inequalities for continuous functions of selfadjoint operators in Hilbert spaces,” Acta Mathematica Vietnamica, 2014.
[26]  S. S. Dragomir, Operator Inequalities of the Jensen, ?eby?ev and Grüss Type, Springer Briefs in Mathematics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2012.
[27]  S. S. Dragomir, Operator Inequalities of Ostrowski and Trapezoidal Type, Springer Briefs in Mathematics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2012.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133