All Title Author
Keywords Abstract


Mates of Competitive Females: The Relationships between Female Aggression, Mate Quality, and Parental Care

DOI: 10.1155/2014/319567

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Though rarely mate-limited, females in a wide variety of species express traits commonly associated with mate competition in males. Recent research has shown that these competitive traits (ornaments, armaments, and intense aggression) often function in the context of female-female competition for nonsexual reproductive resources and are often positively related to reproductive success. Increased success could occur because competitive females acquire limited ecological resources (nest sites, territories, etc.) or because they pair with high quality males, that is, older, more ornamented, or more parental males. Further, males paired with aggressive/low care females may compensate by increasing their paternal efforts. Here, I examined patterns of social pairing and parental care in free-living dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis), a biparental songbird. I found no detectable relationship between female competitive behavior (aggression) and male quality (age, size, or ornamentation) or male provisioning. Thus, neither of the mate choice hypotheses (females compete for males or males prefer aggressive females) was supported. Instead, these results suggest that females compete for nonsexual resources and mate quality is a secondary consideration. I also found a negative relationship between male and female provisioning rates, suggesting that partners adjust their level of parental effort in response to their partner’s efforts. 1. Introduction Though females are rarely mate-limited, they are often limited by access to other important reproductive resources such as territories, ovoposition sites, and dominance rank [1–6]. Social selection argues that competition for any important resource, sexual or nonsexual, can lead to the evolution of ornaments, armaments, intense aggression, or complex acoustic signals, hereafter referred to as competitive traits [1, 2]. Recent empirical work examining the functional consequences of female expression of competitive traits supports the predictions of social selection; females with greater degree of trait expression often have improved reproductive success [1, 2, 4, 6, 7]. This pattern is particularly interesting because in many vertebrates increased trait expression is also associated with a reduction in some forms of maternal care [8–13]. A positive relationship between trait expression and reproductive success might emerge because, as social selection would predict, competitive females are more likely to acquire high quality mates or other limited reproductive resources. However, an alternative explanation is that males

References

[1]  M. J. West-Eberhard, “Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation,” Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 155–183, 1983.
[2]  J. A. Tobias, R. Montgomerie, and B. E. Lyon, “The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 367, no. 1600, pp. 2274–2293, 2012.
[3]  K. E. Cain and E. D. Ketterson, “Competitive females are successful females; phenotype, mechanism, and selection in a common songbird,” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 241–252, 2012.
[4]  K. A. Rosvall, “Intrasexual competition in females: evidence for sexual selection?” Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1131–1140, 2011.
[5]  T. H. Clutton-Brock, “Sexual selection in females,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 3–11, 2009.
[6]  P. Stockley and J. Bro-J?rgensen, “Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals,” Biological Reviews, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 341–366, 2011.
[7]  T. H. Clutton-Brock and E. Huchard, “Social competition and selection in males and females,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 368, no. 1631, Article ID 20130074, 2013.
[8]  K. A. Rosvall, “Cost of female intrasexual aggression in terms of offspring quality: a cross-fostering study,” Ethology, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 332–344, 2011.
[9]  K. A. Rosvall, “Life history trade-offs and behavioral sensitivity to testosterone: an experimental test when female aggression and maternal care co-occur,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 1, Article ID e54120, 2013.
[10]  B. Dantzer, A. G. McAdam, R. Palme, M. M. Humphries, S. Boutin, and R. Boonstra, “Maternal androgens and behaviour in free-ranging North American red squirrels,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 469–479, 2011.
[11]  K. E. Cain and E. D. Ketterson, “Costs and benefits of competitive traits in females: aggression, maternal care and reproductive success,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, Article ID e77816, 2013.
[12]  C. Packer, D. A. Collins, A. Sindimwo, and J. Goodall, “Reproductive constraints on aggressive competition in female baboons,” Nature, vol. 373, no. 6509, pp. 60–63, 1995.
[13]  M. J. Nelson-Flower, P. A. R. Hockey, C. O'Ryan et al., “Costly reproductive competition between females in a monogamous cooperatively breeding bird,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 280, no. 1762, Article ID 20130728, 2013.
[14]  T. Slagsvold and J. T. Lifjeld, “Polygyny in birds: the role of competition between females for male parental care,” American Naturalist, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 59–94, 1994.
[15]  K. A. Rosvall, “Sexual selection on aggressiveness in females: evidence from an experimental test with tree swallows,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 1603–1610, 2008.
[16]  J. C. Beehner, J. E. Phillips-Conroy, and P. L. Whitten, “Female testosterone, dominance rank, and aggression in an Ethiopian population of hybrid baboons,” American Journal of Primatology, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 101–119, 2005.
[17]  S. R. Pryke, “Fiery red heads: female dominance among head color morphs in the Gouldian finch,” Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 621–627, 2007.
[18]  K. Yasukawa and W. A. Searcy, “Aggression in female Red-Winged Blackbirds: a strategy to ensure male parental investment,” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 13–17, 1982.
[19]  T. Slagsvold, “Female-female aggression and monogamy in great tits Parus major,” Ornis Scandinavica, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 155–158, 1993.
[20]  M. I. Sandell, “Female aggression and the maintenance of monogamy: Female behaviour predicts male mating status in European starlings,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 265, no. 1403, pp. 1307–1311, 1998.
[21]  J. M. Jawor, R. Young, and E. D. Ketterson, “Females competing to reproduce: dominance matters but testosterone may not,” Hormones and Behavior, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 362–368, 2006.
[22]  K. A. Rosvall, “Do males offset the cost of female aggression? An experimental test in a biparental songbird,” Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 161–168, 2010.
[23]  R. W. Knapton and J. B. Falls, “Differences in parental contribution among pair types in the polymorphic white-throated sparrow,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 1288–1292, 1983.
[24]  N. Burley, “Parental investment, mate choice, and mate quality,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 3476–3479, 1977.
[25]  B. J. Hatchwell and N. B. Davies, “Provisioning of nestlings by dunnocks, Prunella modularis, in pairs and trios compensation reactions by males and females,” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 199–209, 1990.
[26]  M. J. L. Magrath and J. Komdeur, “Is male care compromised by additional mating opportunity?” Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 424–430, 2003.
[27]  L. Wolf, E. D. Ketterson, and V. Nolan, “Female condition and delayed benefits to males that provide parental care: a removal study,” The Auk, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 371–380, 1991.
[28]  P. O. Dunn and A. Cockburn, “Evolution of male parental care in a bird with almost complete cuckoldry,” Evolution, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 2542–2548, 1996.
[29]  E. D. Ketterson and V. Nolan Jnr, “Male parental behavior in birds,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 25, pp. 601–628, 1994.
[30]  K. E. Cain, C. M. Bergeon Burns, and E. D. Ketterson, “Testosterone production, sexually dimorphic morphology, and digit ratio in the dark-eyed junco,” Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 462–469, 2013.
[31]  E. D. Ketterson and V. Nolan Jr., “Adaptation, exaptation, and constraint: a hormonal perspective,” The American Naturalist, vol. 154, pp. S4–S25, 1999.
[32]  R. L. Holberton, T. Boswell, and M. J. Hunter, “Circulating prolactin and corticosterone concentrations during the development of migratory condition in the Dark-eyed Junco, Junco hyemalis,” General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 155, no. 3, pp. 641–649, 2008.
[33]  J. M. Casto, J. Nolan V., and E. D. Ketterson, “Steroid hormones and immune function: experimental studies in wild and captive dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis),” American Naturalist, vol. 157, no. 4, pp. 408–420, 2001.
[34]  P. Deviche, C. Breuner, and M. Orchinik, “Testosterone, corticosterone, and photoperiod interact to regulate plasma levels of binding globulin and free steroid hormone in Dark-eyed Juncos, Junco hyemalis,” General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 67–77, 2001.
[35]  D. G. Reichard and E. D. Ketterson, “Estimation of female home-range size during the nestling period of dark-eyed juncos,” The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 614–620, 2012.
[36]  D. M. O'Neal, D. G. Reichard, K. Pavilis, and E. D. Ketterson, “Experimentally-elevated testosterone, female parental care, and reproductive success in a songbird, the Dark-eyed Junco (Junco hyemalis),” Hormones and Behavior, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 571–578, 2008.
[37]  E. D. Ketterson, “Aggressive behavior in wintering Dark-eyed Juncos: determinants of dominance and their possible relation to geographic variation in sex ratio,” The Wilson Bulletin, pp. 371–383, 1979.
[38]  E. D. Clotfelter, D. M. O'Neal, J. M. Gaudioso et al., “Consequences of elevating plasma testosterone in females of a socially monogamous songbird: Evidence of constraints on male evolution?” Hormones and Behavior, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 171–178, 2004.
[39]  D. A. Zysling, T. J. Greives, C. W. Breuner, J. M. Casto, G. E. Demas, and E. D. Ketterson, “Behavioral and physiological responses to experimentally elevated testosterone in female dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis carolinensis),” Hormones and Behavior, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 200–207, 2006.
[40]  K. A. Rosvall, C. M. Bergeon Burns, J. Barske et al., “Neural sensitivity to sex steroids predicts individual differences in aggression: implications for behavioural evolution,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 279, no. 1742, pp. 3547–3555, 2012.
[41]  K. E. Cain and E. D. Ketterson, “Individual variation in testosterone and parental care in a female songbird; the dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis),” Hormones and Behavior, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 685–692, 2013.
[42]  V. Nolan, E. D. Ketterson, D. A. Cristol et al., Dark-Eyed Junco, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2002.
[43]  J. W. McGlothlin, P. G. Parker, V. Nolan Jr., and E. D. Ketterson, “Correlational selection leads to genetic integration of body size and an attractive plumage trait in dark-eyed juncos,” Evolution, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 658–671, 2005.
[44]  W. L. Reed, M. E. Clark, P. G. Parker et al., “Physiological effects on demography: a long-term experimental study of testosterone's effects on fitness,” American Naturalist, vol. 167, no. 5, pp. 667–683, 2006.
[45]  K. E. Cain, M. S. Rich, K. Ainsworth, and E. D. Ketterson, “Two sides of the same coin? Consistency in aggression to conspecifics and predators in a female songbird,” Ethology, vol. 117, no. 9, pp. 786–795, 2011.
[46]  M. H. Balph, “Winter social behaviour of dark-eyed juncos: communication, social organization, and ecological implications,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 859–884, 1977.
[47]  R. L. Holberton, K. P. Able, and J. C. Wingfield, “Status signalling in dark-eyed juncos, Junco hyemails: plumage manipulations and hormonal correlates of dominance,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 681–689, 1989.
[48]  J. W. McGlothlin, J. M. Jawor, T. J. Greives, J. M. Casto, J. L. Phillips, and E. D. Ketterson, “Hormones and honest signals: males with larger ornaments elevate testosterone more when challenged,” Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 39–48, 2008.
[49]  T. Székely, J. D. Reynolds, and J. Figuerola, “Sexual size dimorphism in shorebirds, gulls, and alcids: the influence of sexual and natural selection,” Evolution, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1404–1413, 2000.
[50]  J. Sall, “Leverage plots for general linear hypotheses,” The American Statistician, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 308–315, 1990.
[51]  E. D. Clotfelter, A. B. Pedersen, J. A. Cranford et al., “Acorn mast drives long-term dynamics of rodent and songbird populations,” Oecologia, vol. 154, no. 3, pp. 493–503, 2007.
[52]  N. R. LeBas, “Female finery is not for males,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 170–173, 2006.
[53]  K. Otter and L. Ratcliffe, “Female initiated divorce in a monogamous songbird: abandoning mates for males of higher quality,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 263, no. 1368, pp. 351–355, 1996.
[54]  L. Wolf, E. D. Ketterson, and V. Nolan Jr., “Paternal influence on growth and survival of dark-eyed junco young: do parental males benefit?” Animal Behaviour, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1601–1618, 1988.
[55]  D. M. O'Neal, Considering the Roles of Climate Change, Winter Habitat, and Immune Function in a Differential Migrant, 2010.
[56]  E. D. Clotfelter, C. Ray Chandler, V. Nolan Jr., and E. D. Ketterson, “The influence of exogenous testosterone on the dynamics of nestling provisioning in dark-eyed juncos,” Ethology, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 18–25, 2007.
[57]  P. L. Schwagmeyer and D. W. Mock, “How consistently are good parents good parents? Repeatability of parental care in the house sparrow, Passer domesticus,” Ethology, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 303–313, 2003.
[58]  S. Nakagawa, D. O. S. Gillespie, B. J. Hatchwell, and T. Burke, “Predictable males and unpredictable females: sex difference in repeatability of parental care in a wild bird population,” Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1674–1681, 2007.
[59]  S. E. Maguire and R. J. Safran, “Morphological and genetic predictors of parental care in the North American barn swallow Hirundo rustica erythrogaster,” Journal of Avian Biology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 74–82, 2010.
[60]  M. V. Studd and R. J. Robertson, “Sexual selection and variation in reproductive strategy in male yellow warblers (Dendroica petechia),” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 101–109, 1985.
[61]  C. A. Hinde, “Negotiation over offspring care?—a positive response to partner-provisioning rate in great tits,” Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 6–12, 2006.
[62]  S. R. Pryke and S. C. Griffith, “Socially mediated trade-offs between aggression and parental effort in competing color morphs,” American Naturalist, vol. 174, no. 4, pp. 455–464, 2009.
[63]  T. Limbourg, A. C. Mateman, and C. M. Lessells, “Parental care and UV coloration in blue tits: opposite correlations in males and females between provisioning rate and mate's coloration,” Journal of Avian Biology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2013.
[64]  M. L. Demory, C. F. Thompson, and S. K. Sakaluk, “Male quality influences male provisioning in house wrens independent of attractiveness,” Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1156–1164, 2010.
[65]  J. G. Kopachena and J. B. Falls, “Re-evaluation of morph-specific variations in parental behavior of the white-throated sparrow,” The Wilson Bulletin, vol. 105, pp. 48–59, 1993.
[66]  S. Rytk?nen, M. Orell, K. Koivula, and M. Soppela, “Correlation between two components of parental investment: nest defence intensity and nestling provisioning effort of willow tits,” Oecologia, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 386–393, 1995.
[67]  E. D. Ketterson, V. Nolan Jr., L. Wolf, and C. Ziegenfus, “Testosterone and avian life histories: effects of experimentally elevated testosterone on behavior and correlates of fitness in the dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis),” American Naturalist, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 980–999, 1992.
[68]  D. A. Enstrom, E. D. Ketterson, and V. Nolan Jr., “Testosterone and mate choice in the dark-eyed junco,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1135–1146, 1997.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus