All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Evaluating Different Aspects of Prospective Memory in Amnestic and Nonamnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

DOI: 10.1155/2014/805929

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


Prospective memory, the inability to remember an intended action, is a common complaint, but not formally assessed in most clinical and research studies of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In this study, patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), non-amnestic cognitive impairment (naMCI), and cognitively normal (CN) elders were assessed using the Miami Prospective Memory Test (MPMT). A unique aspect of the paradigm was that participants were scored for intention to perform, accuracy in recollection for specific elements of the task, and the need for reminder cues. Excellent test-retest stability was obtained for MPMT Event-Related (ER), combined Time-Related (TR) subscales, and total MPMT score for aMCI subjects. MPMT impairments were observed in 48.6% of aMCI, 29.4% of naMCI, and 10.0% of normal elderly participants. Prospective memory deficits were common in participants with aMCI, and occurred in almost a third of naMCI participants. Intention to perform and need for reminder cues were significantly more impaired than retrospective memory for specific details of the task. It is concluded that assessment of different elements of prospective memory is important in MCI research and that inability to remember intended actions is a significant feature in those as risk for Alzheimer’s disease. 1. Introduction Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) has increasingly been accepted as a prodrome or significant risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease in clinical settings [1]. The vast majority of efforts to assess aMCI have relied on paradigms that focus on retrospective memory. These involve typical list learning tests or measuring episodic memory for passages or visual reproduction tasks. Impairments in delayed recall or rate of forgetting on verbal episodic memory tasks have been found to be a sensitive indicator of mild Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [2, 3] and a predictor of progression to dementia among elders who do not meet criteria for dementia upon initial evaluation [4–6]. Despite these efforts, with the growing understanding that earlier treatments may lead to better outcomes, there is a pressing need to develop tests that are optimally sensitive to different types of memory deficits in the earliest stages of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease. Previous memory models have relied on retrospective memory (RM) (i.e., a type of episodic memory), involving remembering events experienced in one’s past. Prospective memory (PM) is another form of episodic memory defined as remembering to carry out intended actions at an


[1]  B. Dubois, H. H. Feldman, C. Jacova, et al., “Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: preliminary findings,” The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 11, pp. 252–255, 2007.
[2]  O. Almkvist, “Neuropsychological features of early Alzheimer's disease: preclinical and clinical stages,” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, vol. 93, no. 165, pp. 63–71, 1996.
[3]  R. T. Linn, P. A. Wolf, D. L. Bachman et al., “The “preclinical phase” of probable Alzheimer's disease: a 13-year prospective study of the Framingham cohort,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 485–490, 1995.
[4]  D. P. Devanand, D. M. Jacobs, M.-X. Tang et al., “The course of psychopathologic features in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 257–263, 1997.
[5]  D. P. Devanand, M. Folz, M. Gorlyn, J. R. Moeller, and Y. Stern, “Questionable dementia: clinical course and predictors of outcome,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 321–328, 1997.
[6]  R. C. Petersen, “Mild cognitive impairment or questionable dementia?” Archives of Neurology, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 643–644, 2000.
[7]  M. A. McDaniel and G. O. Einstein, “The neuropsychology of prospective memory in normal aging: a componential approach,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 2147–2155, 2011.
[8]  P. S. Bissiacchi, “The neuropsychological approach in the study of prospective memory,” in Prospective Memory: Theory and Applications, M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, and M. A. McDaniel, Eds., pp. 219–237, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1996.
[9]  H. M. Palmer and S. McDonald, “The role of frontal and temporal lobe processes in prospective remembering,” Brain and Cognition, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 103–107, 2000.
[10]  H. Kazui, A. Matsuda, N. Hirono et al., “Everyday memory impairment of patients with mild cognitive impairment,” Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, vol. 19, no. 5-6, pp. 331–337, 2005.
[11]  S. Karantzoulis, A. K. Troyer, and J. B. Rich, “Prospective memory in amnestic mild cognitive impairment,” Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 407–415, 2009.
[12]  C. Thompson, J. D. Henry, P. G. Rendell, A. Withall, and H. Brodaty, “Prospective memory function in mild cognitive impairment and early dementia,” Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 318–325, 2010.
[13]  B. Wilson, J. Cockburn, A. Baddeley, and R. Hiorns, “The development and validation of a test battery for detecting and monitoring everyday memory problems,” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 855–870, 1989.
[14]  S. A. Raskin, “Memory for intentions screening test: psychometric properties and clinical evidence,” Brain Impairment, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 23–33, 2009.
[15]  S. Jones, ?. Livner, and L. B?ckman, “Patterns of prospective and retrospective memory impairment in preclinical Alzheimer's disease,” Neuropsychology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 144–152, 2006.
[16]  R. C. Petersen, “Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 256, no. 3, pp. 183–194, 2004.
[17]  J. C. Morris, “The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules,” Neurology, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 2412–2414, 1993.
[18]  D. A. Loewenstein, R. Duara, T. Arguelles, and S. Arguelles, “Use of the fuld object-memory evaluation in the detection of mild dementia among Spanish and English-speaking groups,” The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 300–307, 1995.
[19]  D. Wechsler, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-3rd Edition (WAIS-3), Harcourt Assessment, San Antonio, Tex, USA, 1997.
[20]  R. K. Heaton, S. W. Miller, M. J. Taylor, and I. Grant, Revised Comprehensive Norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery: Demographically Adjusted Neuropsychological Norms for African American and Caucasian Adults, Psychological Assessment Resources, Lutz, Fla, USA, 2004.
[21]  R. M. Reitan, “The relation of the Trail Making Test to organic brain damage,” Journal of Consulting Psychology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 393–394, 1955.
[22]  D. A. Loewenstein and A. Acevedo, The Prospective Memory Test: Administration and Scoring Manual, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Fla, USA, 2004.
[23]  M. S. Albert, S. T. DeKosky, D. Dickson et al., “The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease,” Alzheimer's and Dementia, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 270–279, 2011.
[24]  L. Spíndola and S. M. D. Brucki, “Prospective memory in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment,” Dementia Neuropsychology, vol. 5, pp. 64–68, 2001.
[25]  J. S. Simons, M. L. Sch?lvinck, S. J. Gilbert, C. D. Frith, and P. W. Burgess, “Differential components of prospective memory? Evidence from fMRI,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1388–1397, 2006.
[26]  C. L. Carey, S. P. Woods, J. D. Rippeth et al., “Prospective memory in HIV-1 infection,” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 536–548, 2006.
[27]  E. van der Berg, N. Kant, and A. Postma, “Remembering to buy milk on the way home! A meta-analytic review of prospective memory in mild cognitive impairment in dementia,” Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, vol. 18, pp. 706–716, 2012.


comments powered by Disqus