All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

ISRN Agronomy  2012 

Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate and Cultivar Interaction Effects on Nitrogen Recovery, Utilization Efficiency, and Agronomic Performance of Spring Barley

DOI: 10.5402/2012/531647

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

A study was carried out at Lacombe, Alberta, to develop baseline information on nitrogen recovery, utilization efficiency, and agronomic performance of spring barley. This information may enable us to understand where the inefficiencies of N nutrition may lay and determine strategies to improve nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). Three divergent cultivars, “Manley” (two-rowed, tall, late maturing), “Noble” (six-rowed, mid-height, intermediate maturing), and “Tukwa” (six-rowed, semidwarf, early maturing), were grown under low (0?kg?ha-1), moderate (50?kg?ha-1) and high (100?kg ha-1) rates of applied N fertilization. Both N recovery and utilization efficiency decreased with the increase in rate of applied N fertilizer, and NUE declined from 45?kg?kg-1N under the low N treatment to 33?kg kg-1N under the moderate treatment and 24?kg?kg-1N under the high N treatment. The test cultivars were comparable in N uptake, but Tukwa and Noble were more efficient in their utilization of the N taken up than Manley, particularly under high N. Subsequently, while grain yield of Tukwa and Noble had increased linearly with rate of N fertilizer, the grain yield of Manley showed a declining trend under high N. This implies that, where a high input condition is targeted, improvement in N utilization efficiency may need to be given due consideration. 1. Introduction The cost of N fertilizers, as tied to the cost of natural gas and other contributing factors such as inflation, has sharply increased over the years. For example, in the last two decades alone, the average price for urea, one of the most commonly used forms of N fertilizer, has increased in the United States by about 150%, from $212?Mg?1 in the spring of 1991 to $526?Mg?1 in the spring of 2011 [1]. This increase in cost of N fertilizers has certainly affected profit margins of primary producers particularly for low market value crops such as barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). In addition, there are increasing concerns about environmental pollution of excessive N from agricultural uses. Improvement in nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) may increase net returns to producers and, at the same time, reduce the amount of N lost to the environment and its negative consequences. Nitrogen use efficiency is defined as grain yield per unit of N available to the crop, and it is the product of two primary components: the efficiency of recovery of available N from soil (often called N uptake efficiency, UpE) and the amount of grain yield produced per unit of N taken up by the crop (often called N utilization efficiency, UtE) [2]. Further, UtE

References

[1]  United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), “U.S. Fertilizer Use and Price,” Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, DC, USA, 2011, http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FertilizerUse/.
[2]  R. H. Moll, E. J. Kamprath, and W. Jackson, “Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 562–564, 1982.
[3]  J. I. Ortiz-Monasterio, K. D. Sayre, S. Rajaram, and M. McMahon, “Genetic progress in wheat yield and nitrogen use efficiency under four nitrogen rates,” Crop Science, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 898–904, 1997.
[4]  Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Agronomic and Fertilizer Management of Barley in Alberta, 2008, http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/agdex12433.
[5]  W. Sinebo, R. Gretzmacher, and A. Edelbauer, “Genotypic variation for nitrogen use efficiency in Ethiopian barley,” Field Crops Research, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 43–60, 2004.
[6]  Y. Anbessa, P. Juskiw, A. Good, J. Nyachiro, and J. Helm, “Genetic variability in nitrogen use efficiency of spring barley,” Crop Science, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1259–1269, 2009.
[7]  “The Alberta Soil Information Viewer,” Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development, 2011, http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/sag10372.
[8]  Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), “Barley List of Varieties which are Registered in Canada,” CFIA, Ottawa, Canada, 2008, http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/plaveg/variet/barorge.shtml.
[9]  J. Helm, D. Salmon, D. Dyson, and W. Stewart, “Registration of “Noble” barley,” Crop Science, vol. 29, no. 1, p. 235, 1989.
[10]  J. Helm, M. Cortez, D. Salmon, P. Jedel, and W. Stewart, “Registration of “Tukwa” barley,” Crop Science, vol. 36, no. 3, p. 809, 1996.
[11]  Alberta Agriculture, Standard Operating Procedures Manual, Soil and Crop Diagnostic Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 1995.
[12]  Alberta Agriculture and Food, Crop Protection Guide, Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Information Package Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 2000.
[13]  A. Limon-Ortega, K. D. Sayre, and C. A. Francis, “Wheat nitrogen use efficiency in a bed planting system in northwest Mexico,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 303–308, 2000.
[14]  SAS Institute, SAS/STAT Software Version 9.2, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA, 2008.
[15]  A. M. Saxton, “A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in Proc Mixed,” in Proceedings of the 23rd SAS Users Group International, pp. 1243–1246, Nashville, Nashville, Tenn, USA, March 1998.
[16]  R. Sylvester-Bradley and D. R. Kindred, “Analysing nitrogen responses of cereals to prioritize routes to the improvement of nitrogen use efficiency,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 1939–1951, 2009.
[17]  S. Muurinen, J. Kleemola, and P. Peltonen-Sainio, “Accumulation and translocation of nitrogen in spring cereal cultivars differing in nitrogen use efficiency,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 441–449, 2007.
[18]  W. R. Raun and G. V. Johnson, “Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 357–363, 1999.
[19]  K. G. Briggs, “Response of six-row barley to N and P2O5 fertilizer application in high fertility sites in central Alberta,” Canadian Journal of Plant Science, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 317–326, 1991.
[20]  R. H. McKenzie, A. B. Middleton, L. Hall, J. DeMulder, and E. Bremer, “Fertilizer response of barley grain in south and central Alberta,” Canadian Journal of Soil Science, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 133–147, 2004.
[21]  C. A. Grant, L. E. Gauer, and T. D. Gehl, “Yield response of semidwarf and conventional height barley cultivars to nitrogen fertilizer under varying moisture conditions,” Canadian Journal of Plant Science, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 361–371, 1991.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus