All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Anaesthetic Management of Parturient with Acute Atrial Fibrillation for Emergency Caesarean Section

DOI: 10.1155/2013/807624

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


A 31-year-antenatal lady with critical mitral stenosis presented for emergency caesarean section with fetal distress. She had acute onset atrial fibrillation. She was given a combined spinal epidural (CSE) anaesthesia and her arrhythmia was successfully managed after delivery of the baby with intravenous calcium channel blocker. Mitral stenosis is the most common valvular heart disease complicating pregnancy in developing countries. The physiological changes during pregnancy may exacerbate their cardiac symptoms. They may present with complications like congestive cardiac failure, atrial fibrillation, or pulmonary thromboembolism during the antenatal, intrapartum, or postpartum period. Here we discuss the management of parturient woman with high maternal and fetal risk presenting for emergency caesarean. The merits of regional anaesthesia and the importance of invasive monitoring are also discussed. 1. Introduction A 31-year-old lady presented to the antenatal clinic at 34 weeks of gestation with increasing shortness of breath. She was a known case of rheumatic heart disease with mitral stenosis and had undergone balloon mitral valvotomy 12 years ago and closed mitral commissurotomy 7 years ago. She was gravida 8, para 2 with 5 spontaneous abortions and had undergone caesarean section twice since the commissurotomy but had only one living issue who was 3 years old. The other had died a neonatal death. She was on oral Digoxin 0.25?mg od and penicillin prophylaxis since the past seven years. During the present pregnancy, her dyspnea had progressed from NYHA class II to class III. She was put on bed rest and started on diuretics. As part of her workup for elective caesarean section for obstetric reasons, she presented for preanaesthesia evaluation. On auscultation of the heart, she had a mid-diastolic murmur in the mitral area and loud P2. She had no signs of congestive cardiac failure. Her electrocardiogram showed a normal sinus rhythm with a heart rate of 80/min. She had a normal coagulation profile with prothrombin time 13/13, activated partial thromboplastin time 29/31, and platelet count 210 × 109/litre. Her haemoglobin was 11.7?g%. She was advised a fresh echocardiograph and the risk of anaesthesia was explained to her. The next day she presented for emergency CS with onset of preterm labour and a nonreassuring fetal heart rate. She was immediately taken to the operating room. On examination, the patient was dyspneic at rest and unable to lie supine. She had pedal edema and her jugular venous pulse was raised. A 2D echocardiography done only that


[1]  N. Bhatla, S. Lal, G. Behera et al., “Cardiac disease in pregnancy,” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 153–159, 2003.
[2]  M. Kannan and G. Vijayanand, “Mitral stenosis and pregnancy: current concepts in anaesthetic practice,” Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 439–444, 2010.
[3]  U. Elkayam and F. Bitar, “Valvular heart disease and pregnancy part I: native valves,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 223–230, 2005.
[4]  S. C. Siu, J. M. Colman, S. Sorensen et al., “Adverse neonatal and cardiac outcomes are more common in pregnant women with cardiac disease,” Circulation, vol. 105, no. 18, pp. 2179–2184, 2002.
[5]  S. C. Reimold and J. D. Rutherford, “Valvular heart disease in pregnancy,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 349, no. 1, pp. 52–59, 2003.
[6]  V. Fuster, L. E. Rydén, D. S. Cannom et al., “ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation),” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. e149–e246, 2006.
[7]  R. M. L. E. Orme, C. S. Grange, Q. P. Ainsworth, and C. R. Grebenik, “General anaesthesia using remifentanil for caesarean section in parturients with critical aortic stenosis: a series of four cases,” International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 183–187, 2004.
[8]  “Cardiac arrest associated with pregnancy,” Circulation, vol. 112, pp. IV-150–IIV153, 2005.
[9]  E. Langes?ter, M. Dragsund, and L. A. Rosseland, “Regional anaesthesia for a Caesarean section in women with cardiac disease: a prospective study,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 46–54, 2010.
[10]  L. S. Wann, A. B. Curtis, C. T. January, K. A. Ellenbogen, and J. E. Lowe, “Estes NAM 3rdet al writing on behalf of the 2006 ACC/AHA/ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Writing Committee. 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update on the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (updating the 2006 guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 57, pp. 223–242, 2011.
[11]  S. C. Siu, M. Sermer, J. M. Colman et al., “Prospective multicenter study of pregnancy outcomes in women with heart disease,” Circulation, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 515–521, 2001.
[12]  S. K. Sharma, D. R. Gambling, N. M. Gajraj, C. Truong, and E. J. Sidawi, “Anesthetic management of a parturient with mixed mitral valve disease and uncontrolled atrial fibrillation,” International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 157–162, 1994.
[13]  D. K. Desai, M. Adanlawo, D. P. Naidoo, J. Moodley, and I. Kleinschmidt, “Mitral stenosis in pregnancy: a four-year experience at King Edward VIII hospital, Durban, South Africa,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 107, no. 8, pp. 953–958, 2000.


comments powered by Disqus