All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Effect of Age and Lordotic Angle on the Level of Lumbar Disc Herniation

DOI: 10.4061/2011/950576

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


It has been previously suggested in the literature that with aging, degenerative changes as well as disc herniation start at the lower lumbar segments, with higher disc involvement observed in an ascending fashion in older age groups. We conducted a study to investigate this correlation between age and level of disc herniation, and to associate it with the magnitude of the Lumbar Lordotic Angle (LLA), as measured by Cobb’s method. We followed retrospectively lumbosacral spine MRI’s of 1419 patients with symptomatic disc herniation. Pearson’s correlation was used in order to investigate the relationship between LLA, age, and level of disc herniation. Student’s -test was applied to assess gender differences. Young patients were found to have higher LLA ( , ) and lower levels of disc herniation ( , ), whereas older patients had higher level herniation in lower LLA group (mean LLA?28.6° and 25.4°) and lower level herniation in high LLA group (mean LLA?33.2°). We concluded that Lumbar lordotic Cobb’s angle and age can be predictors of the level of lumbar disc herniation. This did not differ among men and women ( , ). 1. Introduction The mechanical properties of the intervertebral discs, as well as the interplay between the vertebral spine curvature and the ligaments and musculature that maintain it, not only impart a resilience that is important in protecting the vertebral column against compressive forces encountered in various postures [1], but largely determine the changes induced by aging, which are subsequently associated with degeneration [2], tropism [3, 4], disc herniation [5], and lordosis [6]. These variations are level [7] as well as gender specific [8]. Published morphometric studies suggest that lumbar disc herniation is more cranially localized with age [5], and this finding is as well a mirror spread of degenerative changes [9] which start earlier at the lower lumbar levels [10]. The vertebral spine presents regional curves on sagittal plane, designed to absorb impact, reduce its longitudinal stiffness, and intensify muscular function; nevertheless, it has been noted that some cases of low back pain and sciatica are attributable to abnormal alterations of the curve [11]. Lumbar lordosis is defined as the curvature assumed by the intact lumbar spine to compensate for the inclination of the sacrum, restore an upward spinal orientation, and consequently avoid a forward inclination. Its measure, as proven by multiple investigators, is influenced by various parameters, including age, gender, pelvic bend, and thoracic curvature, among others [7, 8].


[1]  H. S. Amonoo-Kuofi, “Changes in the lumbosacral angle, sacral inclination and the curvature of the lumbar spine during aging,” Acta Anatomica, vol. 145, no. 4, pp. 373–377, 1992.
[2]  K. Hsu, J. Zucherman, W. Shea et al., “High lumbar disc degeneration. Incidence and etiology,” Spine, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 679–682, 1990.
[3]  H. F. Farfan and J. D. Sullivan, “The relation of facet orientation to intervertebral disc failure,” Canadian Journal of Surgery, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 179–185, 1967.
[4]  R. Noren, J. Trafimow, G. B. J. Andersson, and M. S. Huckman, “The role of facet joint tropism and facet angle in disc degeneration,” Spine, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 530–532, 1991.
[5]  R. Dammers and P. J. Koehler, “Lumbar disc herniation: level increases with age,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 58, no. 3-4, pp. 209–212, 2002.
[6]  R. Fernand and D. E. Fox, “Evaluation of lumbar lordosis. A prospective and retrospective study,” Spine, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 799–803, 1985.
[7]  X. G. Cheng, Y. Sun, S. Boonen et al., “Measurements of vertebral shape by radiographic morphometry: sex differences and relationships with vertebral level and lumbar lordosis,” Skeletal Radiology, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 380–384, 1998.
[8]  B. J. Norton, S. A. Sahrmann, and L. R. Van Dillen, “Differences in measurements of lumbar curvature related to gender and low back pain,” Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 524–534, 2004.
[9]  E. V. Spangfort, “The lumbar disc herniation. A computer-aided analysis of 2,504 operations,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, Supplement, vol. 142, pp. 1–95, 1972.
[10]  G. B. J. Andersson, “What are the age-related changes in the spine?” Bailliere's Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 161–173, 1998.
[11]  H. J. Kim, S. Chung, S. Kim et al., “Influences of trunk muscles on lumbar lordosis and sacral angle,” European Spine Journal, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 409–414, 2006.
[12]  Y. Murata, T. Utsumi, E. Hanaoka, K. Takahashi, M. Yamagata, and H. Moriya, “Changes in lumbar lordosis in young patients with low back pain during a 10-year period,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 618–622, 2002.
[13]  M. A. Adams, D. S. McNally, and P. Dolan, “'Stress' distributions inside intervertebral discs. The effects of age and degeneration,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 965–972, 1996.
[14]  I. Karacan, T. Aydin, Z. Sahin et al., “Facet angles in lumbar disc herniation: their relation to anthropometric features,” Spine, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1132–1136, 2004.
[15]  M. Busche-McGregor, J. Naiman, and A. S. Grice, “Analysis of lumbar lordosis in an asymptomatic population of young adults,” The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association, vol. 25, pp. 58–64, 1981.
[16]  J. L. Kelsey and A. A. White, “Epidemiology and impact of low-back pain,” Spine, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 133–142, 1980.
[17]  H. Y. Ko and B. K. Park, “Facet tropism in lumbar motion segments and its significance in disc herniation,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 78, no. 11, pp. 1211–1214, 1997.
[18]  B. M. Cyron and W. C. Hutton, “Articular tropism and stability of the lumbar spine,” Spine, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 168–172, 1980.
[19]  J. H. Lee, Y. Hoshino, K. Nakamura, Y. Kariya, K. Saita, and K. Ito, “Trunk muscle weakness as a risk factor for low back pain: a 5-year prospective study,” Spine, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 54–57, 1999.
[20]  H. L. VonLackum, “The lumbosacral region,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 82, p. 1109, 1924.
[21]  M. A. Adams and W. C. Hutton, “The effect of posture on the fluid content of lumbar intervertebral discs,” Spine, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 665–671, 1983.
[22]  C. A. Niosi and T. R. Oxland, “Degenerative mechanics of the lumbar spine,” The Spine Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, 2004.
[23]  M. A. Adams, D. W. McMillan, T. P. Green, and P. Dolan, “Sustained loading generates stress concentrations in lumbar intervertebral discs,” Spine, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 434–438, 1996.
[24]  H. F. Farfan, R. M. Huberdeau, and H. I. Dubow, “Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: the influence of geometrical features on the pattern of disc degeneration–a post mortem study,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 492–510, 1972.
[25]  T. K. F. Taylor, J. Melrose, D. Burkhardt et al., “Spinal biomechanics and aging are major determinants of the proteoglycan metabolism of intervertebral disc cells,” Spine, vol. 25, no. 23, pp. 3014–3020, 2000.


comments powered by Disqus