All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

PLOS ONE  2014 

X-Ray Dose Reduction in Abdominal Computed Tomography Using Advanced Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092568

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


Objective This work aims to explore the effects of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) algorithms in reducing computed tomography (CT) radiation dosages in abdominal imaging. Methods CT scans on a standard male phantom were performed at different tube currents. Images at the different tube currents were reconstructed with the filtered back-projection (FBP), 50% ASiR and MBIR algorithms and compared. The CT value, image noise and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the reconstructed abdominal images were measured. Volumetric CT dose indexes (CTDIvol) were recorded. Results At different tube currents, 50% ASiR and MBIR significantly reduced image noise and increased the CNR when compared with FBP. The minimal tube current values required by FBP, 50% ASiR, and MBIR to achieve acceptable image quality using this phantom were 200, 140, and 80 mA, respectively. At the identical image quality, 50% ASiR and MBIR reduced the radiation dose by 35.9% and 59.9% respectively when compared with FBP. Conclusions Advanced iterative reconstruction techniques are able to reduce image noise and increase image CNRs. Compared with FBP, 50% ASiR and MBIR reduced radiation doses by 35.9% and 59.9%, respectively.


[1]  IMV Medical Information Division (2006) IMV 2006 CT Market Summary Report. Des Plains, Ill: USA. Available: Accessed 10 January 2013.
[2]  Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357: 2277–84. doi: 10.1056/nejmra072149
[3]  Hall EJ, Brenner DJ (2008) Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol 81: 362–78. doi: 10.1259/bjr/01948454
[4]  ICRP (1990) Optimization and Decision Making in Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 55. Ann. ICRP 20 (1).
[5]  McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N, Koffer J, Yu L, et al. (2009) Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am 47: 27–40. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2008.10.006
[6]  Launders J (2011) Radiation risks: CT dose-reduction technologies: a review. Biomed Instrum Technol 45: 453–7. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-45.6.453
[7]  Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W (2010) Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: Application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. Am J Roentgenol 194: 191–9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.09.2953
[8]  Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, Kujak JL, Lawder HJ, et al. (2009) Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193: 764–71. doi: 10.2214/ajr.09.2397
[9]  Marin D, Nelson RC, Schindera ST, Richard S, Youngblood RS, et al. (2010) Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: Improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm-initial clinical experience. Radiology 254: 145–53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.09090094
[10]  Schindera ST, Diedrichsen L, Müller HC, Rusch O, Marin D, et al. (2011) Iterative reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: Assessment of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose in a phantom study. Radiology 260: 454–62. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11102217
[11]  Wang G, Yu H, De Man B (2008) An outlook on x-ray CT research and development. Med Phys 35: 1051–64. doi: 10.1118/1.2836950
[12]  Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, Hsieh J (2007) A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 34: 4526–44. doi: 10.1118/1.2789499
[13]  Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J, Licato PE, Do S, et al. (2010) Abdominal CT: Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology 257: 373–83. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10092212
[14]  Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, Min JK, Lin FY, et al. (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. Am J Roentgenol 195: 649–54. doi: 10.2214/ajr.10.4285
[15]  Vorona GA, Ceschin RC, Clayton BL, Sutcavage T, Tadros SS, et al. (2011) Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique in children: a feasibility study. Pediatr Radiol 41: 1174–82. doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2063-x
[16]  Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK, Pien H, Hsieh J, et al. (2010) Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 45: 202–10. doi: 10.1097/rli.ob013e3181dzfeec
[17]  Min JK, Swaminathan RV, Vass M, Gallagher S, Weinsaft JW (2009) High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: Comparison to standard definition 64-detector row computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3: 246–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2009.06.006
[18]  Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M, Sato J, Akai H (2012) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Eur Radiol 22: 1613–23. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2452-z
[19]  Nelson RC, Feuerlein S, Boll DT (2011) New iterative reconstruction techniques for cardiovascular computed tomography: how do they work, and what are the advantages and disadvantages? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5: 286–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.07.001
[20]  Husarik DB, Marin D, Samei E, Richard S, Chen B, et al. (2012) Radiation dose reduction in abdominal computed tomography during the late hepatic arterial phase using a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm: how low can we go? Invest Radiol 47: 468–74. doi: 10.1097/rli.0b013e318251eafd
[21]  Singh S, Kalra MK, Do S, Thibault JB, Pien H, et al. (2012) Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen. J Comput Assist Tomogr 36: 347–53. doi: 10.1097/rct.0b013e31824e639e
[22]  Miéville FA, Gudinchet F, Brunelle F, Bochud FO, Verdun FR (2013) Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: Physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments - A phantom approach. Phys Med 29: 99–110. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2011.12.004


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us


微信:OALib Journal