All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

PLOS ONE  2014 

The Impact of Movements and Animal Density on Continental Scale Cattle Disease Outbreaks in the United States

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091724

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Globalization has increased the potential for the introduction and spread of novel pathogens over large spatial scales necessitating continental-scale disease models to guide emergency preparedness. Livestock disease spread models, such as those for the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) epidemic in the United Kingdom, represent some of the best case studies of large-scale disease spread. However, generalization of these models to explore disease outcomes in other systems, such as the United States’s cattle industry, has been hampered by differences in system size and complexity and the absence of suitable livestock movement data. Here, a unique database of US cattle shipments allows estimation of synthetic movement networks that inform a near-continental scale disease model of a potential FMD-like (i.e., rapidly spreading) epidemic in US cattle. The largest epidemics may affect over one-third of the US and 120,000 cattle premises, but cattle movement restrictions from infected counties, as opposed to national movement moratoriums, are found to effectively contain outbreaks. Slow detection or weak compliance may necessitate more severe state-level bans for similar control. Such results highlight the role of large-scale disease models in emergency preparedness, particularly for systems lacking comprehensive movement and outbreak data, and the need to rapidly implement multi-scale contingency plans during a potential US outbreak.

References

[1]  Yang PC, Chu RM, Chung WB, Sung HT (1999) Epidemiological characteristics and financial costs of the 1997 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Taiwan. Vet Rec 145: 731–734.
[2]  Thompson D, Muriel P, Russell D, Osborne P, Bromley A, et al. (2002) Economic costs of the foot and mouth disease outbreak in the United Kingdom in 2001. Rev Sci Tech 21: 675–687.
[3]  Keeling MJ, Woolhouse MEJ, Shaw DJ, Matthews L, Chase-Topping M, et al. (2001) Dynamics of the 2001 UK foot and mouth epidemic: stochastic dispersal in a heterogeneous landscape. Science 294: 813–817. doi: 10.1126/science.1065973
[4]  Ferguson NM, Donnelly CA, Anderson RM (2001) The foot-and-mouth epidemic in Great Britain: pattern of spread and impact of interventions. Science 292: 1155–1160. doi: 10.1126/science.1061020
[5]  Keeling MJ, Woolhouse MEJ, May RM, Davies G, Grenfell BT (2003) Modelling vaccination strategies against foot-and-mouth disease. Nature 421: 136–142. doi: 10.1038/nature01343
[6]  Tildesley MJ, Savill NJ, Shaw DJ, Deardon R, Brooks SP, et al. (2006) Optimal reactive vaccination strategies for a foot-and-mouth outbreak in the UK. Nature 440: 83–86. doi: 10.1038/nature04324
[7]  Chis Ster I, Ferguson NM (2007) Transmission parameters of the 2001 foot and mouth epidemic in Great Britain. PLoS ONE 2: e502 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000502.
[8]  Chis Ster I, Singh BK, Ferguson NM (2009) Epidemiological inference for partially observed epidemics: the example of the 2001 foot and mouth epidemic in Great Britain. Epidemics 1: 21–34. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2008.09.001
[9]  Green DM, Kiss IZ, Kao RR (2006) Modelling the initial spread of foot-and-mouth disease through animal movements. Proc Biol Sci 273: 2729–2735. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3648
[10]  Kao RR, Danon L, Green DM, Kiss IZ (2006) Demographic structure and pathogen dynamics on the network of livestock movements in Great Britain. Proc Biol Sci 273: 1999–2007. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3505
[11]  Kiss IZ, Green DM, Kao RR (2006) The network of sheep movements within Great Britain: network properties and their implications for infectious disease spread. J R Soc Interface 3: 669–677. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2006.0129
[12]  Ortiz-Pelaez A, Pfeiffer DU, Soares-Magalh?es RJ, Guitian FJ (2006) Use of social network analysis to characterize the pattern of animal movements in the initial phases of the 2001 foot and mouth disease (FMD) epidemic in the UK. Prev Vet Med 76: 40–55. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2006.04.007
[13]  Kao RR, Green DM, Johnson J, Kiss IZ (2007) Disease dynamics over very different time-scales: foot-and-mouth disease and scrapie on the network of livestock movements in the UK. J R Soc Interface 4: 907–916. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2007.1129
[14]  Robinson SE, Everett MG, Christley RM (2007) Recent network evolution increases the potential for large epidemics in the British cattle population. J R Soc Interface 4: 669–674. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2007.0214
[15]  National Agricultural Statistics Service, US Department of Agriculture (2007) Census of Agriculture. Available: http://www.nass.usda.gov/census.
[16]  Shields DA, Mathews KH (2003) Interstate livestock movements. USDA ERS Outlook Report LDP-M-108-01. Available: http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/312234/ldp?m10801_1_.pdf.
[17]  Harvey N, Reeves A, Schoenbaum MA, Zagmutt-Vergara FJ, Dubé C, et al. (2007) The North American Animal Disease Spread Model: a simulation model to assist decision making in evaluating animal disease incursions. Prev Vet Med 82: 176–197. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.05.019
[18]  Bates TW, Thurmond MC, Carpenter TE (2003) Description of an epidemic simulation model for use in evaluating strategies to control an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease. Am J Vet Res 64: 195–204. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2003.64.195
[19]  Speck DE (2008) Overview of the Multiscale Epidemiologic/Economic Simulation and Analysis (MESA) decision support system. US Department of Energy Report LLNL-TR-404724. Available: https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/36063?0.pdf.
[20]  Portacci K, Miller RS, Riggs PD, Buhnerkempe MG, Abrahamsen LM (2013) Assessment of paper Interstate Certificates of Veterinary Inspection to support disease tracing in cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 234: 555–560. doi: 10.2460/javma.243.4.555
[21]  Csardi G, Nepusz T (2006) The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal Complex Systems 1695.
[22]  R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
[23]  Lindstr?m T, Lewerin SS, Wennergren U (2012) Influence on disease spread dynamics of herd characteristics in a structured livestock industry. J R Soc Interface 9: 1287–1294. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0625
[24]  Lindstr?m T, Grear DA, Buhnerkempe M, Webb CT, Miller RS, et al. (2013) A Bayesian approach for modeling cattle movements in the United States: scaling up a partially observed network. PLoS ONE 8: e53432 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053432.
[25]  Sattenspiel L, Dietz KA (1995) structured epidemic model incorporating geographic mobility among regions. Math Biosci 128: 71–91. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(94)00068-b
[26]  Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE, editors (2004) Ecology, Genetics and Evolution of Metapopulations. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press. 696 p.
[27]  Smith DL, Lucey B, Waller LA, Childs JE, Real LA (2002) Predicting the spatial dynamics of rabies epidemics on heterogeneous landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 3668–3672.
[28]  Ovaskainen O, Hanski I (2001) Spatially structured metapopulation models: global and local assessment of metapopulation capacity. Theor Popul Biol 60: 281–302. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.2001.1548
[29]  Ovaskainen O (2002) The effective size of a metapopulation living in a heterogeneous patch network. Am Nat 160: 612–628. doi: 10.1086/342818
[30]  US Department of Agriculture (2011) Small-scale U.S. Cow-calf Operations. Report 596.0411, USDA–APHIS–VS, CEAH, Fort Collins, CO.
[31]  US Department of Agriculture (2008) Dairy 2007, Part II: Changes in the U.S. Dairy Cattle Industry, 1991-2007. Report N481.0308, USDA–APHIS–VS, CEAH, Fort Collins, CO.
[32]  Buhnerkempe MG, Grear DA, Portacci K, Miller RS, Lombard JE, et al. (2013) A national-scale picture of U.S. cattle movements obtained from Interstate Certificate of Veterinary Inspection data. Prev Vet Med 112: 318–329. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.08.002
[33]  Vernon MC, Keeling MJ (2012) Impact of regulatory perturbations to disease spread through cattle movements in Great Britain. Prev Vet Med 105: 110–117. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.12.016
[34]  National Research Council (2010) Evaluation of a Site-Specific Risk Assessment for the Department of Homeland Security’s Planned National Bio- and Agro-Defense Facility in Manhattan, Kansas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
[35]  National Research Council (2012) Evaluation of the Updated Site-Specific Risk Assessment for the National Bio- and Agro-Defense Facility in Manhattan, Kansas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
[36]  Bajardi P, Barrat A, Natale F, Savini L, Colizza V (2011) Dynamical patterns of cattle trade movements. PLoS ONE 6: e19869 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019869.
[37]  Bajardi P, Barrat A, Savini L, Colizza V (2012) Optimizing surveillance for livestock disease spreading through animal movements. J R Soc Interface 9: 2814–2825. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0289
[38]  National Agricultural Statistics Service, US Department of Agriculture (2012) Quick stats Washington, DC. Available: http://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/.
[39]  Tildesley MJ, Deardon R, Savill NJ, Bessell PR, Brooks SP, et al. (2008) Accuracy of models for the 2001 foot-and-mouth epidemic. Proc Biol Sci 275: 1459–1468. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0006

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus