OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用：99美元

投递稿件

查看量	下载量

相关文章
Reaction of peach tree genotypes to bacterial leaf spot caused by Xanthomonas arboricola pv. prunis
Evaluation of antibiotic activity produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa LV strain against Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni
Técnicas de avalia？？o da resistência de ameixeira à Xanthomonas arboricola pv pruni
Comportamento reológico de xantana produzida por Xanthomonas arboricola pv pruni para aplica？？o em fluido de perfura？？o de po？os de petróleo
AFLP analysis of Xanthomonas axonopodis and X. arboricola strains used in xanthan production studies reveal high levels of polymorphism
Influence of agitation and aeration in xanthan production by Xanthomonas campestris pv pruni strain 101
Multilocus Sequence Typing Reveals Relevant Genetic Variation and Different Evolutionary Dynamics among Strains of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis
Proteome of the phytopathogen Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri: a global expression profile
Influence of agitation and aeration in xanthan production by Xanthomonas campestris pv pruni strain 101 Influencia de la agitación y la aireación en la producción de xantano por Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni cepa 101
A Filamentous Hemagglutinin-Like Protein of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri, the Phytopathogen Responsible for Citrus Canker, Is Involved in Bacterial Virulence
更多...

PLOS ONE 2013

Comparative RNA-Seq Analysis of Early-Infected Peach Leaves by the Invasive Phytopathogen Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054196

Didier Socquet-Juglard, Tim Kamber, Jo？l F. Pothier, Danilo Christen, Cesare Gessler, Brion Duffy, Andrea Patocchi

Full-Text Cite this paper Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni is a quarantine bacterial pathogen that threatens peach production by causing necrotic spots on leaves and fruits, thus with the potential of severely reducing yields. The current understanding of the host plant defense responses to the pathogen is very limited. Using whole transcriptome sequencing, differential gene expression was analyzed at two time points, 2 h and 12 h post inoculation (hpi), by comparing the inoculated samples to their respective controls. On the total of 19,781 known peach genes that were expressed in all time points and conditions, 34 and 263 were differentially expressed at 2 and 12 hpi, respectively. Of those, 82% and 40% were up-regulated, respectively; and 18% and 60% were down-regulated, respectively. The functional annotation based on gene ontology (GO) analysis highlighted that genes involved in metabolic process and response to stress were particularly represented at 2 hpi whereas at 12 hpi cellular and metabolic processes were the categories with the highest number of genes differentially expressed. Of particular interest among the differentially expressed genes identified were several pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) receptors, disease resistance genes including several RPM1-like and pathogenesis related thaumatin encoding genes. Other genes involved in photosynthesis, in cell wall reorganization, in hormone signaling pathways or encoding cytochrome were also differentially expressed. In addition, novel transcripts were identified, providing another basis for further characterization of plant defense-related genes. Overall, this study gives a first insight of the peach defense mechanisms during the very early stages of infection with a bacterial disease in the case of a compatible interaction.

References

[1]	Smith EF (1903) Observation on a hitherto unreported bacterial disease, the cause of which enters the plant through ordinary stomata. Science 17: 456–457.
[2]	Anonymous (2006) EPPO standards PM 7/64. Diagnostics Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni. Bull EPPO 36: 129–133.
[3]	Aarrouf J, Garcin A, Lizzi Y, El Maataoui M (2008) Immunolocalization and histocytopathological effects of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni on naturally infected leaf and fruit tissues on peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch). J Phytopathol 156: 338–345.
[4]	Garcin A, Rouzet J, Nottéghem JL (2005) Xanthomonas des arbres fruitiers à noyau. Editions CTIFL, Paris, France.
[5]	Hajri A, Pothier JF, Fischer-Le Saux M, Bonneau S, Poussier S, et al. (2012) Type three effector gene distribution and sequence analysis provide new insights into the pathogenicity of plant-pathogenic Xanthomonas arboricola. Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 371–384.
[6]	Alfano JR, Collmer A (2004) Type III secretion system effector proteins: double agents in bacterial disease and plant defense. Annu Rev Phytopathol 42: 385–414.
[7]	Bazzi C, Stefani E, Minardi P, Mazzucchi U (1990) Suscettibilità comparativa del susino a Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni. L’Informatore Agrario 46: 71–74.
[8]	Garcin A, Bresson J (2011) Sensibilité des arbres à noyau au Xanthomonas – Bilan de huit ans d’expérimentation. L’arboriculture Fruitière 653: 30–33.
[9]	Socquet-Juglard D, Patocchi A, Pothier JF, Christen D, Duffy B (2012) Evaluation of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni inoculation techniques to screen for bacterial spot resistance in apricot. J Plant Pathol 94: S1.91–S1.96.
[10]	Socquet-Juglard D, Duffy B, Pothier JF, Christen D, Gessler C, et al.. (2012) Identification of a major QTL for Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni resistance in apricot. Tree Genet Genomes DOI: 10.1007/s11295–012–0562-z.
[11]	Yang N (2012) Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with resistance to bacterial spot (Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni) in peach. PhD Dissertation, Clemson University.
[12]	Sherif S, Paliyath G, Jayasankar S (2011) Molecular characterization of peach PR genes and their induction kinetics in response to bacterial infection and signaling molecules. Plant Cell Rep 4: 697–711.
[13]	FAOSTAT (2010) www.faostat.org.Accessed 15 August 2012.
[14]	Arumuganathan K, Earle E (1991) Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 9: 208–218.
[15]	Rajapakse S, Belthoff LE, He G, Estager AE, Scorza R, et al. (1995) Genetic linkage mapping in peach using morphological, RFLP and RAPD markers. Theor Appl Genet 90: 503–510.
[16]	Abbott AG, Lecouls AC, Wang Y, Georgi L, Scorza R, et al. (2002) Peach: the model genome for Rosaceae genomics. Acta Hort 592: 199–209.
[17]	Arús P, Yamamoto T, Dirlewanger E, Abbott AG (2005) Synteny in the Rosaceae. Plant Breed Rev 27: 175–211.
[18]	Joobeur T, Viruel MA, de Vicente MC, Jauregui B, Ballester J, et al. (1998) Construction of a saturated linkage map for Prunus using an almond × peach F2 progeny. Theor Appl Genet 97: 1034–1041.
[19]	Howad W, Yamamoto T, Dirlewanger E, Testolin R, Cosson P, et al. (2005) Mapping with a few plants: Using selective mapping for microsatellite saturation of the Prunus reference map. Genetics 171: 1305–1309.
[20]	Byrne DH, Raseira MB, Bassi D, Piagnani MC, Gasic K, et al. (2012) Peach. In: Badenes ML and Byrne DH (eds.), Fruit Breeding, Handbook of Plant Breeding 8: 505–569.
[21]	Sosinski B, Verde I, Morgante M, Rokhsar D (2010) The international peach genome initiative. A first draft of the peach genome sequence and its use for genetic diversity analysis in peach. 5th International Rosaceae genomics conference. November 2010. Stellenbosch (South Africa), O46.
[22]	Arús P, Verde I, Sosinski B, Zhebentyayeva T, Abbott AG (2012) The peach genome. Tree Genet Genomes DOI: 10.1007/s11295–012–0493–8.
[23]	Verde I, Bassil N, Scalabrin S, Gilmore B, Lawley CT, et al. (2012) Development and evaluation of a 9 K SNP array for peach by internationally coordinated SNP detection and validation in breeding germplasm. PLoS ONE 7(4): e35668.
[24]	Eduardo I, Chietera G, Pirona R, Pacheco I, Troggio M, et al.. (2012) Genetic dissection of aroma volatile compounds from the essential oil of peach fruit: QTL analysis and identification of candidate genes using dense SNP maps. Tree Genet Genomes DOI 10.1007/s11295–012–0546-z.
[25]	Trainotti L, Bonghi C, Ziliotto F, Zanin D, Rasori A, et al. (2006) The use of microarray μPEACH1.0 to investigate transcriptome changes during transition from preclimacteric to climacteric phase in peach fruit. Plant Sci 170: 606–613.
[26]	Ogundiwin EA, Marti C, Forment J, Pons C, Granell A, et al. (2008) Development of ChillPeah genomic tools and identification of cold-responsive genes in peach fruits. Plant Mol Biol 68: 379–397.
[27]	Pasquer F, Frey B, Frey E (2008) Identification of cherry incompatibility alleles by microarray. Plant Breed 127: 413–417.
[28]	Bonghi C, Begheldo M, Ziliotto F, Rasori A, Trainotti L, et al. (2010) Transcriptome analyses and postharvest physiology of peaches and nectarines. Acta Hort 877: 69–73.
[29]	Manganaris GA, Rasori A, Bassi D, Geuna F, Ramina A, et al. (2011) Comparative transcript profiling of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) fruit development and on-tree ripening. Tree Genet Genomes 7: 609–616.
[30]	Tao Y, Xie Z, Chen W, Glazebrook J, Chang HS, et al. (2003) Quantitative nature of Arabidopsis responses during compatible and incompatible interactions with the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Plant Cell 15: 317–30.
[31]	Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M (2009) RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 10: 57–63.
[32]	Kim KH, Kang YJ, Kim DH, Yoon MY, Moon JK, et al.. (2011) RNA-Seq analysis of a soybean near-isogenic line carrying bacterial leaf pustule-resistant and -susceptible alleles. DNA Res 1–15.
[33]	Orshinsky AM, Hu J, Opiyo SO, Reddyvari-Channarayappa V, Mitchell TK, Boehm Mj (2012) RNA-seq analysis of the Sclerotinia homoeocarpa-creeping bentgrass pathosystem. PLoS ONE 7: e41150.
[34]	Adhikari B, Savory E, Vaillancourt B, Childs KL, Hamilton JP, et al. (2012) Expression profiling of Cucumis sativus in response to infection by Pseudoperonospora cubensis. PLoS ONE 7: e34954.
[35]	Pothier JF, Smits THM, Blom J, Vorh？lter FJ, Goesmann A, et al. (2011) Complete genome sequence of the stone fruit pathogen Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni. Phytopathology 101: S144–S145.
[36]	Schenk A, Weingart H, Ullrich MS (2008) Extraction of high-quality bacterial RNA from infected leaf tissue for bacterial in planta gene expression analysis by multiplexed fluorescent Northern hybridization. Mol Plant Pathol 9: 227–235.
[37]	Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, et al. (2012) Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-Seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Prot 3: 562–578.
[38]	Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL (2009) Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 10: R25.
[39]	Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi AM, Kwan G, et al. (2010) Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotech 28: 511–515.
[40]	Bateman A, Birney E, Cerruti L, Durbin R, Etwiller L, et al. (2002) The Pfam protein families database. Nucl Acids Res 30: 276–280.
[41]	Conesa A, G？tz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, et al. (2005) Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21: 3674–3676.
[42]	McCarthy FM, Wang N, Magee GB, Nanduri B, Lawrence ML, et al. (2006) AgBase: a functional genomics resource for agriculture. BMC Genomics 7: 229.
[43]	Cocker JS, Davies E (2003) Selection of candidate housekeeping controls in tomato plants using EST data. BioTechniques 35: 740–748.
[44]	Jones JDG, Dangl JL (2006) The plant immune system. Nature 444: 323–329.
[45]	Gómez-Gómez L, Boller T (2000) FLS2: An LRR receptor-like kinase involved in the perception of the bacterial elicitor ？agellin in Arabidopsis. Mol Cell 5: 1003–1011.
[46]	Song WY, Wang GL, Chen LL, Kim HS, Pi LY, et al. (1995) A receptor kinase-like protein encoded by the rice disease resistance gene, Xa21. Science 270: 1804–1806.
[47]	Park CJ, Han SW, Chen X, Ronald PC (2010) Elucidation of XA21-mediated innate immunity. Cell Microbiol 12: 1017–1025.
[48]	Manosalva PM, Davidson RM, Liu B, Zhu XY, Hulbert SH, Leung H, et al. (2009) A germin-like protein gene family functions as a complex quantitative trait locus conferring broad-spectrum disease resistance in rice. Plant Physiol 149: 286–296.
[49]	Wichmann F, Asp T, Widmer F, K？lliker R (2011) Transcriptional responses of Italian ryegrass during interaction with Xanthomonas translucens pv. graminis reveal novel candidate genes for bacterial wilt resistance. Theor Appl Genet 122: 567–569.
[50]	He P, Shan L, Lin NC, Martin GB, Kemmerling B, et al. (2006) Specific bacterial suppressors of MAMP signaling upstream of MAPKKK in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Cell 125: 563–575.
[51]	An SH, Sohn KH, Choi HW, Hwang IS, Lee SC, et al. (2008) Pepper pectin methylesterase inhibitor protein CaPMEI1 is required for antifungal activity, basal disease resistance and abiotic stress tolerance. Planta 228: 61–78.
[52]	Kogov？ek P, Pompe-Novak M, Baebler S, Rotter A, Gow L, et al. (2010) Aggressive and mild Potato virus Y isolates trigger different specific responses in susceptible potato plants. Plant Pathol 59: 1121–1132.
[53]	Escamilla-Trevino LL, Chen W, Card ML, Shih MC, Poulton JE (2006) Arabidopsis thaliana β-Glucosidases BGLU45 and BGLU46 hydrolyse monolignol glucosides. Phytochemistry 67: 1651–1660.
[54]	Kristoffersen P, Brzobohaty B, Hohfeld I, Bako L, Melkonian M, et al. (2000) Developmental regulation of the maize Zm-g60. 1 gene encoding a beta-glucosidase located to plastids. Planta 210: 407–415.
[55]	Morant A, Jorgensen K, Jorgensen C, Paquette SM, Sánchez-Pérez R, et al. (2006) β-Glucosidases as detonators of plant chemical defense. Phytochemistry 69: 1795–1813.
[56]	Bourquin V, Nishikubo N, Abe H, Brumer H, Denman S, et al. (2002) Xyloglucan endotransglycosylases have a function during the formation of secondary cell walls of vascular tissues. Plant Cell 14: 3073–3088.
[57]	Ye XS, Pan SQ, Kuc J (1990) Association of pathogenesis-related proteins and activities of peroxidase, β-1.3-glucanase and chitinase with systemic induced resistance to blue mold of tobacco but not to systemic tobacco mosaic virus. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 36: 523–531.
[58]	Allison SD, Schultz JC (2004) Differential activity of peroxidase isozymes in response to wounding, gypsy moth, and plant hormones in northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.). J Chem Ecol 30: 1363–1379.
[59]	Bonfig KB, Schreiber U, Gabler A, Roitsch T, Berger S (2006) Infection with virulent and avirulent P. syringae strains differentially affects photosynthesis and sink metabolism in Arabidopsis leaves. Planta 225: 1–12.
[60]	Khalaf AA, Gmitter FG, Conesa A, Dopazo J, Moore GA (2011) Fortunella margarita transcriptional reprogramming triggered by Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri. BMC Plant Biol 11: 159.
[61]	Bolton MD (2009) Primary metabolism and plant defense–fuel for the fire. MPMI 22: 487–497.
[62]	Niyogi KK (2000) Safety valves for photosynthesis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3: 455–460.
[63]	Bari R, Jones JDG (2009) Role of plant hormones in plant defense responses. Plant Mol Biol 69: 473–488.
[64]	Woodward AW, Bartel B (2005) Auxin: regulation, action, and interaction. Ann Bot 95: 707–735.
[65]	Wang D, Pajerowska-Mukhtar K, Culler AH, Dong X (2007) Salicylic acid inhibits pathogen growth in plants through repression of the auxin signaling pathway. Curr Biol 17: 1784–1790.
[66]	Ding X, Cao Y, Huang L, Zhao J, Xu C, et al. (2008) Activation of the indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase GH3–8 suppresses expansin expression and promotes salicylate- and jasmonate-independent basal immunity in rice. Plant Cell 20: 228–240.
[67]	Werck-Reichhart D, Feyereisen R (2000) Cytochromes P450: a success story. Genome Biol 1: Reviews.
[68]	Greenberg JT, Vinatzer BA (2003) Identifying type III effectors of plant pathogens and analyzing their interaction with plant cells. Curr Opin Microbiol 6: 20–28.
[69]	Bolwell GP, Bindschedler LV, Blee KA, Butt VS, Davies DR, et al. (2001) The apoplastic oxidative burst in response to biotic stress in plants: a three-component system. J Exp Bot 53: 1367–1376.
[70]	Grant MR, Godiard L, Straube E, Ashfield T, Lewald J, et al. (1995) Structure of the Arabidopsis RPM1 gene enabling dual specificity disease resistance. Science 269: 843–846.
[71]	Mahmood T, Jan A, Komatsu S (2009) Proteomic analysis of bacterial blight defense signaling pathway using transgenic rice overexpressing thaumatin-like protein. Biol Plantarum 53: 285–293.
[72]	Dondini L, Lain O, Geuna F, Banfi R, Gaiotti F, et al. (2007) Development of a new SSR-based linkage map in apricot and analysis of synteny with existing Prunus maps. Tree Genet Genomes 3: 239–249.
[73]	Jung S, Jiwan D, Cho I, Lee T, Abbott A, et al. (2009) Synteny of Prunus and other model plant species. BMC Genomics 10: 76.
[74]	Sherif S, El-Sharkawy I, Paliyath G, Jayasankar S (2012) Differential expression of peach ERF transcriptional activators in response to signaling molecules and inoculation with Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni. J Plant Physiol, doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2012.02.003.
[75]	Cameron RK, Dixon RA, Lamb CJ (1994) Biologically induced systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 5: 715–725.

Full-Text