All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

PLOS ONE  2013 

Trends in the Rates of Peripartum Hysterectomy and Uterine Artery Embolization

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060512

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The objective of this study was to determine the trends in national rates of peripartum hysterectomy (PH) and uterine arterial embolization (UAE) in Korea. We used data collected by the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service of Korea and analyzed data from patients who gave birth during the period from 2005 to 2008. There were 1785,178 deliveries during the study period, including 2636 cases of PH (1.48 per 1000 deliveries). The PH rate in 2005 was 1.57 per 1000 deliveries and in 2008 it was 1.33 per 1000 deliveries. UAE was performed in 161 women (incidence, 0.38 per 1000 deliveries) and 447 women (incidence, 0.98 per 1000 deliveries) in 2005 and 2008, respectively. In Korea, the rate of PH decreased slightly, while the rate of UAE rate increased dramatically during the period from 2005 to 2008. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effects of UAE on the rate of PH performed.

References

[1]  Glaze S, Ekwalanga P, Roberts G, Lange I, Birch C, et al. (2008) Peripartum hysterectomy: 1999 to 2006. Obstet Gynecol 111: 732–738.
[2]  Zelop CM, Harlow BL, Frigoletto FD Jr, Safon LE, Saltzman DH (1993) Emergency peripartum hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168: 1443–1448.
[3]  Chestnut DH, Eden RD, Gall SA, Parker RT (1985) Peripartum hysterectomy: a review of cesarean and postpartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 65: 365–370.
[4]  Whiteman MK, Kuklina E, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Meikle SF, et al. (2006) Incidence and determinants of peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 108: 1486–1492.
[5]  Sakse A, Weber T, Nickelsen C, Secher NJ (2007) Peripartum hysterectomy in Denmark 1995–2004. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86: 1472–1475.
[6]  Zeteroglu S, Ustun Y, Engin-Ustun Y, Sahin G, Kamaci M (2005) Peripartum hysterectomy in a teaching hospital in the eastern region of Turkey. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 120: 57–62.
[7]  Zorlu CG, Turan C, Isik AZ, Danisman N, Mungan T, et al. (1998) Emergency hysterectomy in modern obstetric practice. Changing clinical perspective in time. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 77: 186–190.
[8]  Orbach A, Levy A, Wiznitzer A, Mazor M, Holcberg G, et al. (2011) Peripartum cesarean hysterectomy: critical analysis of risk factors and trends over the years. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 24: 480–484.
[9]  Flood KM, Said S, Geary M, Robson M, Fitzpatrick C, et al. (2009) Changing trends in peripartum hysterectomy over the last 4 decades. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200: 632 e631–636.
[10]  Bodelon C, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Schiff MA, Reed SD (2009) Factors associated with peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 114: 115–123.
[11]  Stivanello E, Knight M, Dallolio L, Frammartino B, Rizzo N, et al. (2010) Peripartum hysterectomy and cesarean delivery: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89: 321–327.
[12]  Sidhu HK, Prasad G, Jain V, Kalra J, Gupta V, et al. (2010) Pelvic artery embolization in the management of obstetric hemorrhage. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89: 1096–1099.
[13]  Pelage JP, Le Dref O, Mateo J, Soyer P, Jacob D, et al. (1998) Life-threatening primary postpartum hemorrhage: treatment with emergency selective arterial embolization. Radiology 208: 359–362.
[14]  Hunter LA (2010) Exploring the role of uterine artery embolization in the management of postpartum hemorrhage. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 24: 207–214.
[15]  Choi NK, Hahn S, Park BJ (2007) Increase in mortality rate following coprescription of cisapride and contraindicated drugs. Ann Pharmacother 41: 667–673.
[16]  Francois K, Ortiz J, Harris C, Foley MR, Elliott JP (2005) Is peripartum hysterectomy more common in multiple gestations? Obstet Gynecol 105: 1369–1372.
[17]  Bai SW, Lee HJ, Cho JS, Park YW, Kim SK, et al. (2003) Peripartum hysterectomy and associated factors. J Reprod Med 48: 148–152.
[18]  Sheiner E, Sarid L, Levy A, Seidman DS, Hallak M (2005) Obstetric risk factors and outcome of pregnancies complicated with early postpartum hemorrhage: a population-based study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 18: 149–154.
[19]  Kacmar J, Bhimani L, Boyd M, Shah-Hosseini R, Peipert J (2003) Route of delivery as a risk factor for emergent peripartum hysterectomy: a case-control study. Obstet Gynecol 102: 141–145.
[20]  O'Leary CM, de Klerk N, Keogh J, Pennell C, de Groot J, et al. (2007) Trends in mode of delivery during 1984–2003: can they be explained by pregnancy and delivery complications? BJOG 114: 855–864.
[21]  Tang S, Li X, Wu Z (2006) Rising cesarean delivery rate in primiparous women in urban China: evidence from three nationwide household health surveys. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195: 1527–1532.
[22]  Winograd RH (2008) Uterine artery embolization for postpartum hemorrhage. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 22: 1119–1132.
[23]  Mercier FJ, Van de Velde M (2008) Major obstetric hemorrhage. Anesthesiol Clin 26: 53–66.
[24]  Bauer ST, Bonanno C (2009) Abnormal placentation. Semin Perinatol 33: 88–96.
[25]  Zwart JJ, Dijk PD, van Roosmalen J (2010) Peripartum hysterectomy and arterial embolization for major obstetric hemorrhage: a 2-year nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202 150: e1–7.
[26]  Jou HJ, Hung HW, Ling PY, Chen SM, Wu SC (2008) Peripartum hysterectomy in Taiwan. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 101: 269–272.
[27]  Kim JY (2006) Construction of National Surveillance System for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Seoul: Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus