All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

PLOS ONE  2013 

Effects of Print Publication Lag in Dual Format Journals on Scientometric Indicators

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059877

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background Publication lag between manuscript submission and its final publication is considered as an important factor affecting the decision to submit, the timeliness of presented data, and the scientometric measures of the particular journal. Dual-format peer-reviewed journals (publishing both print and online editions of their content) adopted a broadly accepted strategy to shorten the publication lag: to publish the accepted manuscripts online ahead of their print editions, which may follow days, but also years later. Effects of this widespread habit on the immediacy index (average number of times an article is cited in the year it is published) calculation were never analyzed. Methodology/Principal Findings Scopus database (which contains nearly up-to-date documents in press, but does not reveal citations by these documents until they are finalized) was searched for the journals with the highest total counts of articles in press, or highest counts of articles in press appearing online in 2010–2011. Number of citations received by the articles in press available online was found to be nearly equal to citations received within the year when the document was assigned to a journal issue. Thus, online publication of in press articles affects severely the calculation of immediacy index of their source titles, and disadvantages online-only and print-only journals when evaluating them according to the immediacy index and probably also according to the impact factor and similar measures. Conclusions/Significance Caution should be taken when evaluating dual-format journals supporting long publication lag. Further research should answer the question, on whether the immediacy index should be replaced by an indicator based on the date of first publication (online or in print, whichever comes first) to eliminate the problems analyzed in this report. Information value of immediacy index is further questioned by very high ratio of authors’ self-citations among the citation window used for its calculation.

References

[1]  Rousseau S, Rousseau R (2012) Interactions between journal attributes and authors’ willingness to wait for editorial decisions. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 63: 1213–1225.
[2]  Peng D, Loh M, Mondry A (2006) Publication lag in biomedical journals varies due to the periodical’s publishing model. Scientometrics 69: 271–286.
[3]  Bouton EN, Stevens-Rayburn S (1995) The preprint perplex in an electronic age. Vistas Astron 39: 149–154.
[4]  Taubes G (1996) APS starts electronic preprint service. Science 273: 304.
[5]  Brown C (2001) The e-volution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists and astronomers. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 52: 187–200.
[6]  Moed HF (2007) The effect of “open access” on citation impact: An analysis of ArXiv's condensed matter section. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 58: 2047–2054.
[7]  McDonald JD (2007) Understanding journal usage: A statistical analysis of citation and use. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 58: 39–50.
[8]  Brown CM (1999) Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: Astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists. J Am Soc Inform Sci 50: 929–943.
[9]  Morse DH, Clintworth WA (2000) Comparing patterns of print and online journal use in an academic health science library. Issues Sci Tech Librarian 28. Available: http://www.istl.org/00-fall/refereed.htm?l. Accessed: 2 Jan 2013.
[10]  Rogers SA (2001) Online journal usage at Ohio State University. Coll Res Libr 621: 25–34.
[11]  Amat CB (2008) Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 selected Food Research journals. Influence of online posting. Scientometrics 74: 379–389.
[12]  Das A, Das P (2006) Delay between online and offline issue of journals: A critical analysis. Libr Inform Sci Res 28: 453–459.
[13]  Lawrence S (2001) Free online availability substantially increases a paper’s impact. Nature 411: 521.
[14]  Schloegl C, Gorraiz J (2010) Comparison of citation and usage indicators: The case of oncology journals. Scientometrics 82: 567–580.
[15]  Xia J, Myears RL, Wilhoite SK (2011) Multiple open access availability and citation impact. J Inform Sci 37: 19–28.
[16]  Seglen PO (1997) Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. Brit Med J 314: 498–502.
[17]  Bar-Ilan J (2009) A closer look at the sources of informetric research. Cybermetrics 13: 4.
[18]  Jacsó P (2009) Errors of omission and their implications for computing scientometric measures in evaluating the publishing productivity and impact of countries. Online Inform Rev 33: 376–385.
[19]  Borgman CL, Furner J (2002) Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. In: Cronin B, editor. Annual review of information science and technology, vol. 36. Medford, NJ: Information Today. 3–72.
[20]  Hammer ?, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4: 1–9.
[21]  Huang G-L, Mei X-Y, Zhang H-X, Wang P-G (2006) Fabrication and application of carbohydrate microarray for analyzing human serum antibody-carbohydrate interaction. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, in press, doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0723-9.
[22]  Muthu Kumar M, Natarajan E (2008) CFD simulation for two-phase mixing in 2D fluidized bed. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, in press, doi: 10.1007/s00170-008-1875-9.
[23]  Natarajan E, Sathish R (2008) Role of nanofluids in solar water heater. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, in press, doi: 10.1007/s00170-008-1876-8.
[24]  Patil P, Thiyagarajan K, Prakash RV, Balasubramaniam K (2008) Damage characterization in SS 304 due to monotonic loading using infrared thermography. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, in press, doi: 10.1007/s00170-008-1870-1.
[25]  Tort ABL, Targino ZH, Amaral OB (2012) Rising publication delays inflate journal impact factors. PLoS ONE 7: e53374.
[26]  Conley JP, Crucini MJ, Driskill RA, ?nder AS (2012) The effects of publication lags on life-cycle research productivity in economics. Econ Inq, in press, doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00480.x.
[27]  Shuai X, Pepe A, Bollen J (2012) How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: Article downloads, Twitter mentions, and citations. PLoS ONE 7: e47523.
[28]  Metcalfe TS (2006) The citation impact of digital preprint archives for solar physics papers. Solar Phys 239: 549–553.
[29]  Bar-Ilan J (2008) Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century – A review. J Informetr 2: 1–52.
[30]  Fassoulaki A, Papilas K, Paraskeva A, Patris N (2002) Impact factor bias and proposed adjustments for its determination. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 46: 902–905.
[31]  Aksnes DW (2003) A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics 56: 235–246.
[32]  Gl?nzel W, Thijs B, Schlemmer B (2004) A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citations in scientific communication. Scientometrics 59: 63–77.
[33]  Craig ID, Plume AM, McVeigh ME, Pringle J, Amin M (2007) Do Open Access Articles Have Greater Citation Impact? A critical review of the literature. Publishing Research Consortium, J Informetr 1: 239–248.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

微信:OALib Journal