Background Grafting has been extensively used to enhance the performance of horticultural crops. Since Charles Darwin coined the term “graft hybrid” meaning that asexual combination of different plant species may generate products that are genetically distinct, highly discrepant opinions exist supporting or against the concept. Recent studies have documented that grafting enables exchanges of both RNA and DNA molecules between the grafting partners, thus providing a molecular basis for grafting-induced genetic variation. DNA methylation is known as prone to alterations as a result of perturbation of internal and external conditions. Given characteristics of grafting, it is interesting to test whether the process may cause an alteration of this epigenetic marker in the grafted organismal products. Methodology/Principal Findings We analyzed relative global DNA methylation levels and locus-specific methylation patterns by the MSAP marker and locus-specific bisulfite-sequencing in the seed plants (wild-type controls), self- and hetero-grafted scions/rootstocks, selfed progenies of scions and their seed-plant controls, involving three Solanaceae species. We quantified expression of putative genes involved in establishing and/or maintaining DNA methylation by q-(RT)-PCR. We found that (1) hetero-grafting caused extensive alteration of DNA methylation patterns in a locus-specific manner, especially in scions, although relative methylation levels remain largely unaltered; (2) the altered methylation patterns in the hetero-grafting-derived scions could be inherited to sexual progenies with some sites showing further alterations or revisions; (3) hetero-grafting caused dynamic changes in steady-state transcript abundance of genes encoding for a set of enzymes functionally relevant to DNA methylation. Conclusions/Significance Our results demonstrate that inter-species grafting in plants could produce extensive and heritable alterations in DNA methylation. We suggest that these readily altered, yet heritable, epigenetic modifications due to interspecies hetero-grafting may shed one facet of insight into the molecular underpinnings for the still contentious concept of graft hybrid.
References
[1]
Liu Y (2006) Historical and modern genetics of plant graft hybridization. Adv Genet 56: 101–129.
[2]
Mudge K, Janick J, Scofield S, Goldschmidt EE (2009) A history of grafting. Hort Rev 35: 437–493.
[3]
Burge GK, Morgan ER, Seelye JF (2002) Opportunities for synthetic plant chimeral breeding: Past and future. Plant cell, tissue and organ culture 70: 13–21.
[4]
Clearwater MJ, Lowe RG, Hofstee BJ, Barclay C, Mandemaker AJ, et al. (2004) Hydraulic conductance and rootstock effects in grafted vines of kiwifruit. J Exp Bot 55: 1371–1382.
[5]
Rivero RM, Ruiz JM, Romero L (2003) Can grafting in tomato plants strengthen resistance to thermal stress? Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 83: 1315–1319.
[6]
Napoli C (1996) Highly Branched Phenotype of the Petunia dad1-1 Mutant Is Reversed by Grafting. Plant Physiol 111: 27–37.
[7]
Venema JH, Dijk BE, Bax JM, van Hasselt PR, Elzenga JTM (2008) Grafting tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) onto the rootstock of a high-altitude accession of Solanum habrochaites improves suboptimal-temperature tolerance. Environmental and Experimental Botany 63: 359–367.
[8]
Albacete A, Martinez-Andujar C, Ghanem ME, Acosta M, Sanchez-Bravo J, et al. (2009) Rootstock-mediated changes in xylem ionic and hormonal status are correlated with delayed leaf senescence, and increased leaf area and crop productivity in salinized tomato. Plant Cell Environ 32: 928–938.
[9]
Rouphael Y, Schwarz D, Krumbein A, Colla G (2010) Impact of grafting on product quality of fruit vegetables. Scientia Horticulturae 127: 172–179.
[10]
Haroldsen VM, Szczerba MW, Aktas H, Lopez-Baltazar J, Odias MJ, et al. (2012) Mobility of Transgenic Nucleic Acids and Proteins within Grafted Rootstocks for Agricultural Improvement. Front Plant Sci 3: 39.
[11]
Darwin C (1868) The variation of animals and plants under domestication. London: J. Murray.
[12]
Tsaballa A, Athanasiadis C, Pasentsis K, Ganopoulos I, Nianiou-Obeidat I, et al. (2013) Molecular studies of inheritable grafting induced changes in pepper (Capsicum annuum) fruit shape. Sci Hortic 149: 2–8.
[13]
Huang Y, Li J, Hua B, Liu Z, Fan M, et al. (2013) Grafting onto different rootstocks as a means to improve watermelon tolerance to low potassium stress. Sci Hortic 149: 80–85.
[14]
Taller J, Hirata Y, Yagishita N, Kita M, Ogata S (1998) Graft-induced genetic changes and the inheritance of several characteristics in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). TAG Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97: 705–713.
[15]
Wang Y, Xie H, Chen LP (2011) Progress in research on plant graft-induced genetic variation. Hereditas (Beijing) 33: 585–590.
[16]
Tsaballa A, Athanasiadis C, Pasentsis K, Ganopoulos I, Nianiou-Obeidat I, et al.. (2012) Molecular studies of inheritable grafting induced changes in pepper (Capsicum annuum) fruit shape. Scientia Horticulturae.
[17]
Lucas WJ, Yoo BC, Kragler F (2001) RNA as a long-distance information macromolecule in plants. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2: 849–857.
[18]
Kim M, Canio W, Kessler S, Sinha N (2001) Developmental changes due to long-distance movement of a homeobox fusion transcript in tomato. Science 293: 287–289.
[19]
Yoo BC, Kragler F, Varkonyi-Gasic E, Haywood V, Archer-Evans S, et al. (2004) A systemic small RNA signaling system in plants. Plant Cell 16: 1979–2000.
[20]
Buhtz A, Pieritz J, Springer F, Kehr J (2010) Phloem small RNAs, nutrient stress responses, and systemic mobility. BMC Plant Biol 10: 64.
[21]
Bai S, Kasai A, Yamada K, Li T, Harada T (2011) A mobile signal transported over a long distance induces systemic transcriptional gene silencing in a grafted partner. J Exp Bot 62: 4561–4570.
[22]
Stegemann S, Bock R (2009) Exchange of genetic material between cells in plant tissue grafts. Science 324: 649–651.
[23]
Thyssen G, Svab Z, Maliga P (2012) Cell-to-cell movement of plastids in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 2439–2443.
[24]
Stegemann S, Keuthe M, Greiner S, Bock R (2012) Horizontal transfer of chloroplast genomes between plant species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 2434–2438.
[25]
Rusk N (2009) Grafting as a potent molecular tool. Nature Methods 6: 484–484.
[26]
Chinnusamy V, Zhu JK (2009) Epigenetic regulation of stress responses in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12: 133–139.
[27]
Mahfouz MM (2010) RNA-directed DNA methylation: mechanisms and functions. Plant Signal Behav 5: 806–816.
[28]
Zhang H, Zhu JK (2011) RNA-directed DNA methylation. Curr Opin Plant Biol 14: 142–147.
[29]
Molnar A, Melnyk CW, Bassett A, Hardcastle TJ, Dunn R, et al. (2010) Small silencing RNAs in plants are mobile and direct epigenetic modification in recipient cells. Science 328: 872–875.
[30]
Dunoyer P, Schott G, Himber C, Meyer D, Takeda A, et al. (2010) Small RNA duplexes function as mobile silencing signals between plant cells. Science 328: 912–916.
[31]
Dong ZY, Wang YM, Zhang ZJ, Shen Y, Lin XY, et al. (2006) Extent and pattern of DNA methylation alteration in rice lines derived from introgressive hybridization of rice and Zizania latifolia Griseb. Theor Appl Genet 113: 196–205.
[32]
Cao X, Jacobsen SE (2002) Locus-specific control of asymmetric and CpNpG methylation by the DRM and CMT3 methyltransferase genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99 Suppl 416491–16498.
[33]
Cao X, Jacobsen SE (2002) Role of the arabidopsis DRM methyltransferases in de novo DNA methylation and gene silencing. Curr Biol 12: 1138–1144.
[34]
Morales-Ruiz T, Ortega-Galisteo AP, Ponferrada-Marin MI, Martinez-Macias MI, Ariza RR, et al. (2006) DEMETER and REPRESSOR OF SILENCING 1 encode 5-methylcytosine DNA glycosylases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 6853–6858.
[35]
Zhu J, Kapoor A, Sridhar VV, Agius F, Zhu JK (2007) The DNA glycosylase/lyase ROS1 functions in pruning DNA methylation patterns in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 17: 54–59.
[36]
Kubota C, McClure MA, Kokalis-Burelle N, Bausher MG, Rosskopf EN (2008) Vegetable grafting: History, use, and current technology status in North America. HortScience 43: 1664–1669.
[37]
Liu YS, Wang QL, Li BY (2010) New insights into plant graft hybridization. Heredity (Edinb) 104: 1–2.
[38]
Reik W, Dean W, Walter J (2001) Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science 293: 1089–1093.
[39]
Gehring M, Henikoff S (2007) DNA methylation dynamics in plant genomes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1769: 276–286.
[40]
Feng S, Jacobsen SE, Reik W (2010) Epigenetic reprogramming in plant and animal development. Science 330: 622–627.
[41]
Cao X, Aufsatz W, Zilberman D, Mette MF, Huang MS, et al. (2003) Role of the DRM and CMT3 methyltransferases in RNA-directed DNA methylation. Curr Biol 13: 2212–2217.
[42]
Wang MB, Wesley SV, Finnegan EJ, Smith NA, Waterhouse PM (2001) Replicating satellite RNA induces sequence-specific DNA methylation and truncated transcripts in plants. RNA 7: 16–28.
[43]
Kidwell K, Osborn T, Beckman J (1992) Simple plant DNA isolation procedures. Plant genomes: methods for genetic and physical mapping: 1–13.
[44]
Reyna-Lopez GE, Simpson J, Ruiz-Herrera J (1997) Differences in DNA methylation patterns are detectable during the dimorphic transition of fungi by amplification of restriction polymorphisms. Mol Gen Genet 253: 703–710.
[45]
Zhao X, Chai Y, Liu B (2007) Epigenetic inheritance and variation of DNA methylation level and pattern in maize intra-specific hybrids. Plant Sci 172: 930–938.
