All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99


Relative Articles

BdorCSP2 Is Important for Antifeed and Oviposition-Deterring Activities Induced by Rhodojaponin-III against Bactrocera dorsalis

Transcriptome Analysis of the Oriental Fruit Fly (Bactrocera dorsalis)

Population dynamics of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, with analysis of the climate factors
广州桔小实蝇(Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel))发生动态及气象因子

Niche Overlap of Congeneric Invaders Supports a Single-Species Hypothesis and Provides Insight into Future Invasion Risk: Implications for Global Management of the Bactrocera dorsalis Complex

Life-History Traits and Population Relative Fitness of Trichlorphon-Resistant and -Susceptible Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae)


Effects of Neem Leaf Dust and a Commercial Formulation of a Neem Compound on the Longevity, Fecundity and Ovarian Development of the Melon Fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) and the Oriental Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Identification and Expression Profile Analysis of Odorant Binding Proteins in the Oriental Fruit Fly Bactrocera dorsalis

High-Throughput Sequencing to Reveal Genes Involved in Reproduction and Development in Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae)


PLOS ONE  2014 

Oviposition Site-Selection by Bactrocera dorsalis Is Mediated through an Innate Recognition Template Tuned to γ-Octalactone

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085764

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


Innate recognition templates (IRTs) in insects are developed through many years of evolution. Here we investigated olfactory cues mediating oviposition behavior in the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis, and their role in triggering an IRT for oviposition site recognition. Behavioral assays with electrophysiologically active compounds from a preferred host, mango, revealed that one of the volatiles tested, γ-octalactone, had a powerful effect in eliciting oviposition by gravid B. dorsalis females. Electrophysiological responses were obtained and flies clearly differentiated between treated and untreated substrates over a wide range of concentrations of γ-octalactone. It triggered an innate response in flies, overriding inputs from other modalities required for oviposition site evaluation. A complex blend of mango volatiles not containing γ-octalactone elicited low levels of oviposition, whereas γ-octalactone alone elicited more oviposition response. Na?ve flies with different rearing histories showed similar responses to γ-octalactone. Taken together, these results indicate that oviposition site selection in B. dorsalis is mediated through an IRT tuned to γ-octalactone. Our study provides empirical data on a cue underpinning innate behavior and may also find use in control operations against this invasive horticultural pest.


[1]  Del Campo ML, Miles CI, Schroeder FC, Mueller C, Booker R, et al. (2001) Host recognition by the tobacco hornworm is mediated by a host plant compound. Nature 411: 186–189.
[2]  Sherman PW, Reeve HK, Pfenning DW (1997) Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Blackwell Science Publication. 69–96 p.
[3]  Stensmyr MC, Dweck HKM, Farhan A, Ibba I, Strutz A, et al. (2012) A conserved dedicated olfactory circuit for detecting harmful microbes in Drosophila. Cell 151: 1345–1357.
[4]  Schwartz NU, Zhong L, Bellemer A, Tracey WD (2012) Egg laying decisions in Drosophila is consistent with foraging costs of larval progeny. PLOS ONE 7(5): e37910 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037910.
[5]  Ryan MJ, Devineni AV, King IFG, Heberlein U (2009) Oviposition preference for and positional avoidance of acetic acid provide a model for competing behavioral drives in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 11352–11357.
[6]  Bentley MD, Day JF (1989) Chemical ecology and behavioral aspects of mosquito oviposition. Annu Rev Entomol 34: 401–421.
[7]  Wertheim B, Dicke M, Vet LEM (2002) Behavioral plasticity in support of a benefit for aggregation pheromone use in Drosophila melanogastor. Entomol Exp Appl 103: 61–71.
[8]  Ponnusamy L, Xu N, Nojima S, Wesson DM, Schal C, et al. (2008) Identification of bacteria and bacteria-associated chemical cues that mediate oviposition site preferences by Aedes aegypti. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 9262–9267.
[9]  Bernays EA (1996) Selective attention and host-plant specialization. Entomol Exp Appl 80: 125–131.
[10]  Tierney A (1986) The evolution of learned and innate behavior. Animal Learn Behav 14: 339–348.
[11]  Avital E, Jablonk E (1994) Social learning and the evolution of behavior. Animal Behav 48: 1195–1199.
[12]  Waddington CH (1953) Genetic assimilation of an acquired character. Evolution 7: 118–126.
[13]  Spathe A, Reinecke A, Olsson SB, Kesavan S, Knaden M, et al. (2013) Plant species and status specific odorant blends guide oviposition choice in the moth Manduca sexta. Chem Senses 38: 147–159.
[14]  Riffell JA, Lei H, Abrell L, Hildebrand JG (2013) Neural Basis of a Pollinator's Buffet: Olfactory Specilization and Learning in Manduca sexta. Science 339: 200–204.
[15]  Pandit SS, Kulkarni RS, Chidley HG, Giri AP, Pujari KH, et al. (2009) Changes in volatile composition during fruit development and ripening of ‘Alphonso’ mango. J Sci Food Agric 89: 2071–2081.
[16]  Jayanthi PDK, Woodcock MC, Caulfield J, Birkett MA, Bruce TJA (2011) Isolation and identification of host cues from mango, Mangifera indica that attract gravid female Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis. J Chem Ecol 38: 361–369.
[17]  Shelly TE (2000) Fecundity of female oriental fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae): effects of methyl eugenol-fed and multiple mates. Annu Entomol Soc Am 93: 559–546.
[18]  Stephens AEA, Kriticos DJ, Leriche A (2007) The current and future potential geographical distribution of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Bull Entomol Res 97: 369–378.
[19]  Yuan M, Bo W, Bo SC, Lian RX, Ying Y (2008) Effect of climate factors and host plants on population dynamics of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) in Suzhou. J Anhui Agric Sci 22: 9619–9621.
[20]  Martelli C, Carlson JR, Emonet T (2013) Intensity invariant dynamics and odor-specific latencies in olfactory receptor neuron response. J Neurosci 33: 6285–6297.
[21]  Dethier VG, Crnjar RM (1982) Candidate codes in the gustatory system of caterpillars. J Gen Physiol 79: 549–569.
[22]  Hudson R (1993) Olfactory imprinting. Curr Opin Neurobiol 3: 548–552.
[23]  Martin JP, Hildebrand JG (2010) Innate recognition of pheromone and food odors in moths: A common mechanism in the antennal lobe? Frontiers Behav Neurosci 4: 159.
[24]  Miller PM, Saltz JB, Cochrane VA, Marcinkowski CM, Mobin R, et al. (2011) Natural variation in decision-making behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. PLOS ONE 6(1): e16436 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016436.
[25]  Paukku S, Kotiaho SK (2008) Female oviposition decisions and their impact on progeny life-history traits. J Insect Behav 21: 505–520.
[26]  Rothschild M, Schoonhoven LM (1977) Assessment of egg load by Pieris brassicae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Nature 266: 352–355.
[27]  Courtney SP (1983) Models of hostplant location by butterflies: the effect of sarch image and search efficiency. Oecologia 59: 317–326.
[28]  Dukas R, Bernays EA (2000) Learning improves growth in the grasshopper Schistocerca Americana.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 2637–2640.
[29]  Jaenike J, Papaj DR (1989) Behavioral plasticity and patterns of host use by insects. In: Roitberg BD, Isman MB, editors. Insect Chemical Ecology. New York: Chapman & Hall. pp 245–264.
[30]  Noriaki K, Satoshi S, Kyo M, Tokio F (2005) In vitro antifungal and antiviral activities of gamma and delta-lactone analogs utilized as food flavoring. Biocontrol Sci 10: 31–36.
[31]  Simone BG (1998) Mathematical modeling of insect ovipositional behavior, (Thesis, Durham University website, Available: Accessed 2012 Nov 28).
[32]  Hannson BS, Stensmyr MC (2011) Evolution of lead olfaction. Neuron 72: 698–711.
[33]  Kreher SA, Mathew D, Kim J, Carlson JR (2008) Translation of sensory input into behavioral output via an olfactory system. Neuron 59: 110–124.


comments powered by Disqus