All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

PLOS Biology  2004 

The Effect of Learning on the Function of Monkey Extrastriate Visual Cortex

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020044

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


One of the most remarkable capabilities of the adult brain is its ability to learn and continuously adapt to an ever-changing environment. While many studies have documented how learning improves the perception and identification of visual stimuli, relatively little is known about how it modifies the underlying neural mechanisms. We trained monkeys to identify natural images that were degraded by interpolation with visual noise. We found that learning led to an improvement in monkeys' ability to identify these indeterminate visual stimuli. We link this behavioral improvement to a learning-dependent increase in the amount of information communicated by V4 neurons. This increase was mediated by a specific enhancement in neural activity. Our results reveal a mechanism by which learning increases the amount of information that V4 neurons are able to extract from the visual environment. This suggests that V4 plays a key role in resolving indeterminate visual inputs by coordinated interaction between bottom-up and top-down processing streams.


[1]  Booth MC, Rolls ET (1998) View-invariant representations of familiar objects by neurons in the inferior temporal visual cortex. Cereb Cortex 8: 510–523.
[2]  Carpenter GA, Grossberg S (1987) A massively parallel architecture for a self-organizing neural pattern recognition machine. Comput Vision Graphics Image Process 37: 54–115.
[3]  Connor CE, Preddie DC, Gallant JL, Van Essen DC (1997) Spatial attention effects in macaque area V4. J Neurosci 17: 3201–3214.
[4]  Crist RE, Li W, Gilbert CD (2001) Learning to see: Experience and attention in primary visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 4: 519–525.
[5]  De Weerd P, Peralta MR, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG (1999) Loss of attentional stimulus selection after extrastriate cortical lesions in macaques [published erratum appears in Nat Neurosci 2000: 409]. Nat Neurosci 2: 753–758.
[6]  Dolan RJ, Fink GR, Rolls E, Booth M, Holmes A, et al. (1997) How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context. Nature 389: 596–599.
[7]  Erickson CA, Desimone R (1999) Responses of macaque perirhinal neurons during and after visual stimulus association learning. J Neurosci 19: 10404–10416.
[8]  Freedman DJ, Riesenhuber M, Poggio T, Miller EK (2002) Visual categorization and the primate prefrontal cortex: neurophysiology and behavior. J Neurophysiol 88: 929–941.
[9]  Gallant JL, Connor CE, Rakshit S, Lewis JW, Van Essen DC (1996) Neural responses to polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in area V4 of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 76: 2718–2739.
[10]  Ghose GM, Yang T, Maunsell JH (2002) Physiological correlates of perceptual learning in monkey V1 and V2. J Neurophysiol 87: 1867–1888.
[11]  Gilbert CD (1998) Adult cortical dynamics. Physiol Rev 78: 467–485.
[12]  Gilbert CD, Sigman M, Crist RE (2001) The neural basis of perceptual learning. Neuron 31: 681–697.
[13]  Girard P, Lomber SG, Bullier J (2002) Shape discrimination deficits during reversible deactivation of area V4 in the macaque monkey. Cereb Cortex 12: 1146–1156.
[14]  Grill-Spector K, Kushnir T, Hendler T, Malach R (2000) The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans. Nat Neurosci 3: 837–843.
[15]  Kobatake E, Wang G, Tanaka K (1998) Effects of shape-discrimination training on the selectivity of inferotemporal cells in adult monkeys. J Neurophysiol 80: 324–330.
[16]  Larkum ME, Zhu JJ, Sakmann B (1999) A new cellular mechanism for coupling inputs arriving at different cortical layers. Nature 398: 338–341.
[17]  Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Poggio T (1995) Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Curr Biol 5: 552–563.
[18]  Logothetis NK, Guggenberger H, Peled S, Pauls J (1999) Functional imaging of the monkey brain. Nat Neurosci 2: 555–562.
[19]  Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Augath M, Trinath T, Oeltermann A (2001) Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 412: 150–157.
[20]  Mehta MR (2001) Neuronal dynamics of predictive coding. Neuroscientist 7: 490–495.
[21]  Mehta MR, Quirk MC, Wilson MA (2000) Experience-dependent asymmetric shape of hippocampal receptive fields. Neuron 25: 707–715.
[22]  Merigan WH (2000) Cortical area V4 is critical for certain texture discriminations, but this effect is not dependent on attention. Vis Neurosci 17: 949–958.
[23]  Moran J, Desimone R (1985) Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science 229: 782–784.
[24]  Mumford D (1992) On the computational architecture of the neocortex. II. The role of cortico-cortical loops. Biol Cybern 66: 241–251.
[25]  Pasupathy A, Connor CE (1999) Responses to contour features in macaque area V4. J Neurophysiol 82: 2490–2502.
[26]  Petrides M, Pandya DN (1999) Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: comparative cytoarchitectonic analysis in the human and the macaque brain and corticocortical connection patterns. Eur J Neurosci 11: 1011–1036.
[27]  Rainer G, Miller EK (2000) Effects of visual experience on the representation of objects in the prefrontal cortex. Neuron 27: 179–189.
[28]  Rainer G, Augath M, Trinath T, Logothetis NK (2001) Nonmonotonic noise tuning of BOLD fMRI signal to natural images in the visual cortex of the anesthetized monkey. Curr Biol 11: 846–854.
[29]  Ranganath C, Rainer G (2003) Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nat Rev Neurosci 4: 193–202.
[30]  Rao RP, Ballard DH (1999) Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nat Neurosci 2: 79–87.
[31]  Sakai K, Miyashita Y (1991) Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates. Nature 354: 152–155.
[32]  Schiller PH (1995) Effect of lesions in visual cortical area V4 on the recognition of transformed objects. Nature 376: 342–344.
[33]  Schoups A, Vogels R, Qian N, Orban G (2001) Practising orientation identification improves orientation coding in V1 neurons. Nature 412: 549–553.
[34]  Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. ATT Tech J 27: 379–423.
[35]  Siegel M, Kording KP, Konig P (2000) Integrating top-down and bottom-up sensory processing by somato-dendritic interactions. J Comput Neurosci 8: 161–173.
[36]  Sigala N, Logothetis NK (2002) Visual categorization shapes feature selectivity in the primate temporal cortex. Nature 415: 318–320.
[37]  Thorpe S, Fize D, Marlot C (1996) Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381: 520–522.
[38]  Ullman S (1995) Sequence seeking and counter streams: a computational model for bidirectional information flow in the visual cortex. Cereb Cortex 5: 1–11.


comments powered by Disqus