This paper studies the welfare effects of a consumption tax rise based on the two-sector small open economy model of Obstfeld and Rogoff (1995) and Lane (1997). The main findings of our analysis are that 1) in the case of free trade, the consumption tax rise has no effect on welfare, 2) when there is the nontraded goods sector, the consumption tax rise has a negative effect on welfare, and 3) the larger the share of nontraded goods in consumption is, the larger the negative welfare effect of consumption tax will be.
M. Obstfeld and K. Rogoff, “Exchange Rate Dynamics Redux,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 103, No. 3, 1995, pp. 624-660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261997
P. R. Lane, “The New Open Economy Macroeconomics: A Survey,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 54, No. 2, 2001, pp. 235-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00073-8
L. Sarno, “Towards a New Paradigm in Open Economy Modelling: Where Do We Stand?” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Vol. 83, No. 3, 2001, pp. 21-36.
P. R. Lane and G. Ganelli, “Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis: The Open Economy Dimension,” In: A. Altug, J. S. Chaddha and C. Nolan, Eds., Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003, pp. 308-334.
P. R. Lane, “Inflation in Open Economies,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 42, No. 3-4, 1997, pp. 327-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(96)01442-0
J. Lee and M. D. Chinn, “Current Account and Real Exchange Rate Dynamics in the G7 Countries,” Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2006, pp. 257-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2005.11.002
