A number of case-control studies have been conducted to investigate the
association of glutathione S-transferase (GST) genetic polymorphisms and endometrial
carcinoma risk. However, these studies have yielded contradictory results. We
therefore performed a meta-analysis to derive a more precise estimation of
the association between polymorphisms on GSTM1, GSTT1 and endometrial
carcinoma. Methods: Identification of relevant studies was carried out
through a search in the following databases Medline, EMbase andChinaNational
Knowledge International (CNKI) up to March. 2013. All case-control studies
that investigated the association between GS-TM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms
and risk of endometrial cancer were included in the study. The pooled odds
ratio (OR) was used for analyses of results and the corresponding 95% confidence
intervals (CI) were estimated. Result: Six published case-control studies of
association between the GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphism and endometrial cancer
risk covering 3558 subjects were included in the metaanalysis, but the
results indicated that the null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms
were not associated with a significantly increased risk of endometrial cancer
(for GSTM1: OR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.86 - 1.4;
for GSTT1: OR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.80 - 1.14, respectively). Conclusion:
This meta-analysis suggests that GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphism may not be
associated with increased risk of endometrial cancer. To validate the
association between polymorphism and endometrial cancer, further studies with
larger numbers of participants worldwide are needed.
Lax, S.F. (2004) Molecular genetic pathways in various types of endometrial carcinoma: From a phenotypical to a molecular-based classification. Virchows Archiv, 444, 213-223. doi:10.1007/s0 0428-003-0947-3
Yang, H.P., et al. (2010) Common genetic variation in the sex hormone metabolic pathway and endometrial cancer risk: Pathway-based evaluation of candidate genes. Carcinogenesis, 31, 827-833. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgp328
Zucchetto, A., et al. (2009) Hormone-related factors and gynecological conditions in relation to endometrial cancer risk. European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 18, 316-321. doi:10.1097/CEJ.0b 013e328329d830
Carlsten, C., et al. (2008) Glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) polymorphisms and lung cancer: A literaturebased systematic HuGE review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 167, 759-774.
Zhuo, X., et al. (2009) GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms and nasopharyngeal cancer risk: An evidencebased meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, 28, 46. doi:10.1186/1756-9966-28-46
Rebbeck, T.R. (1997) Molecular epidemiology of the human glutathione S-transferase genotypes GSTM1 and GSTT1 in cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 6, 733-743.
Hayes, J.D. and Pulford, D.J. (1995) The glutathione Stransferase supergene family: Regulation of GST and the contribution of the isoenzymes to cancer chemoprotection and drug resistance. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 30, 445-600.
Karageorgi, S., et al. (2011) GSTM1 and GSTT1 copy number variation in population-based studies of endometrial cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 20, 1447-1452.
Ashton, K.A., et al. (2010) Polymorphisms in genes of the steroid hormone biosynthesis and metabolism pathways and endometrial cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiology, 34, 328-337. doi:10.1016/j.ca nep.2010.03.005
Doherty, J.A., et al. (2005) Genetic factors in catechol estrogen metabolism in relation to the risk of endometrial cancer. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 14, 357-366. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0479
Esteller, M., et al. (1997) Susceptibility to endometrial cancer: Influence of allelism at p53, glutathione S-transferase (GSTM1 and GSTT1) and cytochrome P-450 (CYP1A1) loci. British Journal of Cancer, 75, 1385-1388.
Kietthubthew, S., Sriplung, H. and Au, W.W. (2001) Genetic and environmental interactions on oral cancer in Southern Thailand. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 37, 111-116. doi:10. 1002/em.1018