All Title Author
Keywords Abstract


团队边界活动的概念构思、影响因素和结果
Team Boundary Activity: Conceptualization, Antecedents and Consequences

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2012.24031, PP. 198-205

Keywords: 团队边界活动;边界扫描;团队绩效;创新
Team Boundary Activity
, Boundary-Spanning, Team Performance, Innovation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

团队边界活动指的是那些定向于外部环境并以此管理本团队与其他团队、组织以及外部群体之间关系的活动,它帮助团队获取、保护信息与资源,增强成员对团队的依附感。边界活动是多层次的概念,它受到来自于组织、团队、个体层面上的影响,并对团队效能、知识转移、创新等产生积极影响。未来还需要对团队边界活动的概念测量,以及内外部活动的平衡给予进一步探讨。
Team boundary activity is defined as team’s actions to establish linkages and to manage interac- tions with parties of the external environment. Such actions can assist a team in obtaining and securing re- sources and information, as well as enforcing members’ affiliation toward their team. Team boundary activity is a multilevel construct. Its antecedents include individual differences, as well as characteristics of groups and organizations. And it is able to boost team performance, knowledge transfer and innovation and so on. Future studies should pay much more attention to its conceptualization and measurement, and issues of equi- librium between internal and external activities.

References

[1]  Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1988). Beyond task and maintenance: Defining external functions in group. Group and Organization Man- agement, 13, 468-494.
[2]  Ancona, D. G. (1990). Outward bound: Strategy for team survival in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 334-365.
[3]  Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992a). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Adminis- trative Science Quarterly, 37, 634-665.
[4]  Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992b). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3, 321-341.
[5]  Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49, 571-582.
[6]  Arrow, H., & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Membership dynamics in groups at work: A theoretical framework. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings, (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 373-411). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
[7]  Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learn- ing Press.
[8]  Bettencourt, L. A., & Brown, S. W. (2003). Role stressors and cus- tomer-oriented boundary spanning behaviors in service organiza- tions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 394-408.
[9]  Boone, T., & Ganeshan, R. (2008). Knowledge acquisition and transfer among engineers: Effects of network structure. Managerial and De- cision Economics, 29, 459-468.
[10]  Choi, J. N. (2002). External activities and team effectiveness: Review and theoretical development. Small Group Research, 33, 181-208.
[11]  Cross, R. L., Yan, A., & Louis, M. R. (2000). Boundary activities in “boundaryless” organizations: A case study of a transformation to a team-based structure. Human Relations, 53, 841-868.
[12]  DeChurch, L. A., & Marks, M. A. (2006). Leadership in multiteam sys- tems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 311-329.
[13]  Drach-Zahavy, A. & Somech, A. (2010). From an intrateam to an in- terteam perspective of effec-tiveness: The role of interdependence and boundary activities. Small Group Research, 41, 143-174.
[14]  Druskat, V. U., & Wheeler, J. V. (2003). Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managing working teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 435-457.
[15]  Edmondson, A. (1992). A safe harbor: Social psychological conditions enabling boundary spanning in work teams. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 2, 179-199.
[16]  Edmondson, A. C. (2004). Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: A group-level lens. In R. M. Kramer, & K. S. Cook, (Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches (pp. 239-272). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
[17]  Faraj, S., & Yan, A. (2009). Boundary work in knowledge teams. Jour- nal of Applied Psychology, 94, 604-617.
[18]  Hargadon, A. B. (1998). Firms as knowledge bro-kers: Lessons in purs- ing continuous innovation. California Management Review, 40, 209- 227.
[19]  Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource de- pendence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35, 1404-1427.
[20]  Hirschhom, L., & Gilmore, T. (1992). The new boundaries of the boundaryless company. Harvard Business Review, 70, 104-115.
[21]  Hoegl, M., Parboteeah, K. P., & Munson, C. L. (2003). Team-level antecedents of individuals’ knowledge networks. Decision Science, 34, 741-770.
[22]  Joshi, A., Pandey, N., & Han, G. (2009). Bracketing team boundary spanning: An examination of task-based, team-level, and contextual antecedents. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 731-759.
[23]  Koka, B. R., Madhavan, R., & Prescott, J. E. (2006). The evolution of interfirm networks: En-vironmental effects on patterns of network change. Academy of Management Review, 31, 721-737.
[24]  Marks, M. A., Mathieu, M. A., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team process. Academy of Man- agement Review, 26, 356-376.
[25]  Marks, M. A., DeChurch, L. A., Mathieu, J. E., Panzer, F. J., & Alonso, A. (2005). Teamwork in multiteam systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 964-971.
[26]  Marrone, J. A., Tesluk, P. E., & Carson, J. B. (2007). A multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequence team member bound- ary-spanning behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1423- 1439.
[27]  Marrone, J. A. (2010). Team boundary spanning: A multilevel review of past research and proposals for the future. Journal of Manage- ment, 36, 911-940.
[28]  Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspective. Annual Reviews of Psy- chology, 56, 365-392.
[29]  Schein, H. E. (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 45, 109-119.
[30]  Triandis, H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndrome. American Psychologist, 51, 407-415.
[31]  Yan, A., & Louis, M. R. (1999). The Migration of organizational func- tions to the work unit level: Buffering, spanning, and bringing up boundaries. Human Relations, 52, 25-47.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

微信:OALib Journal