All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Critical Care  2012 

Is non-invasive ventilation the best ventilatory support for 'do not intubate' patients?

DOI: 10.1186/cc11435

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

We do not, however, entirely accept the views of Schortgen and colleagues. Use of the non-invasive ventilation mask for palliative care patients with acute respiratory distress prevents the patient from eating and talking, and the patient's experience can be that of being smothered. When the major indication is hypoxemia, a treatment option is the administration of high-flow oxygen using up to 60 l/minute heated and humidified oxygen through a nasal cannula [3]. The mouth is thus freed and the patient is able to eat and talk with his family. The cost to efficiency ratio is favourable because the Optiflow? oxygenation system (Fischer and Paykel?, Auckland, New Zealand) costs €4,000 versus €15,600 for the V60? ventilation system (Philips?, Amsterdam, New Netherlands). Non-invasive ventilation appears preferable in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with hypercapnia.We tested high-flow oxygen administration in 10 'do not intubate' patients receiving palliative cancer care in whom a high oxygen concentration mask failed to relieve dyspnoea (abstract accepted for the Société Fran?aise d'Anesthésie Réanimation National Congress, September 2012). The mean respiratory rate fell from 29 to 22 breaths/minute (P <0.01) and the ability to communicate (visual analogue scale) increased from 2 to 7 (P <0.01).To conclude, high-flow oxygen is an easy and cheap way to relieve dyspnoea in 'do not intubate' patients.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus