All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Young Patients’ Views on the Open Web 2.0 Childhood Diabetes Patient Portal: A Qualitative Study

DOI: 10.3390/fi4020514

Keywords: Web 2.0, eHealth, type 1 diabetes, self-care, disease management, patient information, learning, intergradation, health care professionals, children, adolescents, parents

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


Little is known about the views of young patients themselves on interactive Web portal services provided by pediatric practitioners. We aimed to explore their perceptions of a real-world diabetes portal that offers facts and contact with peers and practitioners; e.g., discussion forums, blog tools, self-care and treatment information, research updates and news from local practitioners. Twelve young patients (ages 12–21, median 15 years), one boyfriend, 7 mothers and one father each wrote an essay on their experience from use of the portal. Their essays underwent qualitative content analysis. A major theme was “Helping and facilitating daily life with diabetes”, the portal was perceived as a place where contents are interesting, inspiring and may trigger users’ curiosity. There were three subthemes; “Ease of use in my everyday life,” which includes the perception that the portal was perceived as smooth and easy to enter and navigate whenever needed; that information was easy to understand for different groups of users. “Support via an exchange of experience,” includes the ability to contact peers being regarded advantageous. Some said that just reading others’ experiences can be helpful in terms of persevering; children could find peers in the same age group. “Evidence based information,” includes the perception of the portal being a useful and trustworthy source of facts on e.g., physical activity, blood glucose, medical devices, emotional wellbeing, food and nutrition, and other aspects that impact living with diabetes. Young users expressed positive perceptions towards the interactive web portal. Such services seem to have great potential for supporting young patients and significant others - intergrading for confidence.


[1]  Eysenbach, G. Medicine 2.0: Social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. J. Med. Internet Res. 2008, 10. 19087949
[2]  Eysenbach, G.; Powell, J.; Englesakis, M.; Rizo, C.; Stern, A. Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: Systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. BMJ 2004, 328. 15087341
[3]  Nordfeldt, S.; Hanberger, L.; Bertero, C. Patient and parent views on a Web 2.0 Diabetes Portal—The management tool, the generator, and the gatekeeper: Qualitative study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2010, 12. 20884465
[4]  Ravert, R.D.; Hancock, M.D.; Ingersoll, G.M. Online forum messages posted by adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2004, 30, 827–834, doi:10.1177/014572170403000518.
[5]  Flicker, S.; Goldberg, E.; Read, S.; Veinot, T.; McClelland, A.; Saulnier, P.; Skinner, H. HIV-positive youth’s perspectives on the Internet and e-health. J. Med. Internet Res. 2004, 6.
[6]  Flicker, S.; Haans, D.; Skinner, H. Ethical dilemmas in research on Internet communities. Qual. Health Res. 2004, 14, 124–134, doi:10.1177/1049732303259842.
[7]  Wasko, M.; Faraj, S. “It is what one does”: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2000, 9, 155–173, doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00045-7.
[8]  van Uden-Kraan, C.F.; Drossaert, C.H.; Taal, E.; Shaw, B.R.; Seydel, E.R.; van de Laar, M.A. Empowering processes and outcomes of participation in online support groups for patients with breast cancer, arthritis or fibromyalgia. Qual. Health Res. 2008, 18, 405–417, doi:10.1177/1049732307313429.
[9]  Elwell, L.; Grogan, S.; Coulson, N. Adolescents living with cancer: The role of computer-mediated support groups. J. Health Psychol. 2011, 16, 236–248, doi:10.1177/1359105310371398.
[10]  Verhoeven, F.; van Gemert-Pijnen, L.; Dijkstra, K.; Nijland, N.; Seydel, E.; Steehouder, M. The contribution of teleconsultation and videoconferencing to diabetes care: A systematic literature review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2007, 9.
[11]  Kaufman, N. Internet and information technology use in treatment of diabetes. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2010, 166, 41–46, doi:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02277.x.
[12]  Verhoeven, F.; Tanja-Dijkstra, K.; Nijland, N.; Eysenbach, G.; van Gemert-Pijnen, L. Asynchronous and synchronous teleconsultation for diabetes care: A systematic literature review. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2010, 4, 666–684. 20513335
[13]  Nijland, N.; van Gemert-Pijnen, J.E.; Kelders, S.M.; Brandenburg, B.J.; Seydel, E.R. Evaluation of the use of an “ask-the-expert” e-consultation service for support on health-related requests. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2010, 160, 821–825. 20841800
[14]  Nijland, N.; van Gemert-Pijnen, J.; Boer, H.; Steehouder, M.F.; Seydel, E.R. Evaluation of internet-based technology for supporting self-care: Problems encountered by patients and caregivers when using self-care applications. J. Med. Internet Res. 2008, 10.
[15]  Lampe, K.; Doupi, P.; van den Hoven, M.J. Internet health resources: From quality to trust. Methods Inf. Med. 2003, 42, 134–142. 12743649
[16]  Findahl, O. Svenskarna Och Internet 2010 (in Swedish); World Internet Institute: Stockholm, Sweden, 2010.
[17]  Povlsen, L. How can we adapt education for children across different countries? Horm. Res. 2002, 57, 72–74, doi:10.1159/000053318.
[18]  Plougmann, S.; Hejlesen, O.K.; Cavan, D.A. DiasNet—A diabetes advisory system for communication and education via the internet. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2001, 64, 319–330, doi:10.1016/S1386-5056(01)00214-3.
[19]  Cadario, F.; Binotti, M.; Brustia, M.; Mercandino, F.; Moreno, G.; Esposito, S.; Baldelli, R.; Bona, G. Telecare for teenagers with type 1 diabetes: A trial. Minerva Pediatr. 2007, 59, 299–305. 17947836
[20]  Nordfeldt, S.; Johansson, C.; Carlsson, E.; Hammersjo, J.A. Use of the Internet to search for information in type 1 diabetes children and adolescents: A cross-sectional study. Technol. Health Care 2005, 13, 67–74. 15706065
[21]  Brink, S.J.; Miller, M.; Moltz, K.C. Education and multidisciplinary team care concepts for pediatric and adolescent diabetes mellitus. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 15, 1113–1130, doi:10.1515/JPEM.2002.15.8.1113.
[22]  Ludvigsson, J.; Bolli, G.B. Intensive insulin treatment in diabetic children. Diabetes Nutr. Metab. 2001, 14, 292–304. 11806471
[23]  Hanberger, L.; Ludvigsson, J.; Nordfeldt, S. Quality of care from the patient’s perspective in pediatric diabetes care. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2006, 72, 197–205, doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2005.10.009.
[24]  Wikblad, K.F. Patient perspectives of diabetes care and education. J. Adv. Nurs. 1991, 16, 837–844, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1991.tb01765.x.
[25]  Nordqvist, C.; Hanberger, L.; Timpka, T.; Nordfeldt, S. Health professionals’ attitudes towards using a Web 2.0 portal for child and adolescent diabetes care: Qualitative study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2009, 11.
[26]  Nordfeldt, S.; Ludvigsson, J. Adverse events in intensively treated children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Acta Paediatr. 1999, 88, 1184–1193, doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.1999.tb01016.x.
[27]  Hanberger, L. Quality of Care in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: Patients’ and Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives; Link?ping University Electronic Press: Link?ping, Sweden, 2010. Available online: (accessed on 2 May 2012).
[28]  Timpka, T.; Eriksson, H.; Ludvigsson, J.; Ekberg, J.; Nordfeldt, S.; Hanberger, L. Web 2.0 systems supporting childhood chronic disease management: A pattern language representation of a general architecture. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2008, 8, 54, doi:10.1186/1472-6947-8-54.
[29]  Mayring, P. Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2008. Available online: (accessed on 2 May 2012).
[30]  Krippendorff, K. Content Analysis. In An Introduction to Its Methodology, 2nd ed.; Sage Publication, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2004.
[31]  Bartlett, Y.K.; Coulson, N.S. An investigation into the empowerment effects of using online support groups and how this affects health professional/patient communication. Patient Educ. Couns. 2011, 83, 113–119, doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.029.
[32]  Richardson, C.R.; Buis, L.R.; Janney, A.W.; Goodrich, D.E.; Sen, A.; Hess, M.L.; Mehari, K.S.; Fortlage, L.A.; Resnick, P.J.; Zikmund-Fisher, B.J.; Strecher, V.J.; Piette, J.D. An online community improves adherence in an internet-mediated walking program. Part 1: Results of a randomized controlled trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2010, 12.
[33]  Eysenbach, G. The law of attrition. J. Med. Internet Res. 2005, 7.
[34]  Kerr, C.; Murray, E.; Stevenson, F.; Gore, C.; Nazareth, I. Internet interventions for long-term conditions: Patient and caregiver quality criteria. J. Med. Internet Res. 2006, 8.
[35]  Umefjord, G.; Sandstrom, H.; Malker, H.; Petersson, G. Medical text-based consultations on the Internet: A 4-year study. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2008, 77, 114–121, doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.01.009.
[36]  Peyrot, M. The DAWN Youth WebTalk Study: Methods, findings, and implications. Pediatr. Diabetes 2009, 10, 37–45, doi:10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00612.x.
[37]  Martenson, E.K.; Fagerskiold, A.M.; Bertero, C.M. Observations of health-care professionals sharing and contributing responsibility in paediatric caring situations. Int. J. Nurs. Pract. 2009, 15, 185–190, doi:10.1111/j.1440-172X.2009.01743.x.
[38]  Martenson, E.K.; Fagerskiold, A.M.; Runeson, I.V.; Bertero, C.M. The ethical demand in nursing: A scandinavian perspective. Nurs. Sci. Q. 2009, 22, 281–288, doi:10.1177/0894318409338681.
[39]  Pagliari, C. Design and evaluation in eHealth: Challenges and implications for an interdisciplinary field. J. Med. Internet Res. 2007, 9.


comments powered by Disqus