Constructing a personal identity is an activity much more complex than elaborating a series of online profiles, which are only digital hints of the Self. The construction of our personal identity is a context-mediated activity. Our hypothesis is that young people are enabled, as digital natives and social network users, to co-construct the “context of communication” in which their narrative identities will be interpreted and understood. In particular, the aim of this paper is to show that such “context of communication”, which can be seen as the hermeneutical counterpart of the “networked publics” elaborated by Danah Boyd, emerges out of the tension between trust and privacy. In other terms, it is, on the one hand, the outcome of a web of trustful relations and, on the other, the framework in which the informational norms regulating teens’ expectations of privacy protection are set and evaluated. However, these expectations can be frustrated, since the information produced in such contexts can be disembedded and re-contextualized across time. The general and widespread use of information technology is, in fact, challenging our traditional way of thinking about the world and our identities in terms of stable and durable structures; they are reconstituted, instead, into novel forms.
Dey, A.K. Understanding and using context. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. J. 2001, 5, pp. 4–7. Available online: www.cc.gatech.edu/fce/ctk/pubs/PeTe5-1.pdf (accessed on 3 August 2011).
Floridi, L. Information Ethics, its Nature and Scope. In Moral Philosophy and Information Technology; van den Hoven, J., Weckert, J., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2008; pp. 40–65.
Durante, M. Re-designing the Role of Law in the Information Society: Mediating between the Real and the Virtual. In Law and Technology. Looking into the Future; Fernandez-Barrera, M., Gomes de Andrade, N., de Filippi, P., de Azevedo Cunha, M., Sartor, G., Casanovas, P., Eds.; European Press Academic Publishing: Firenze, Italy, 2009; pp. 31–50.
Sartor, G. Privacy, Reputation and Trust: Some Implications for Data Protection. EUI Working Paper; Series Law 2006/4; European University Institute, 2006. 2006. Available online: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=891123 (accessed on 3 August 2011).
Durante, M. What Model of Trust for Networked Cooperation? Online Social Trust in the Production of Common Goods (Knowledge Sharing). In Living, Working and Learning Beyond Technology; Bynum, T.W., Calzarossa, M., de Lotto, I., Rogerson, S., Eds.; University of Pavia: Mantua, Italy, 2008; pp. 211–223.
Castelfranchi, C.; Falcone, R. Social Trust: Cognitive Anatomy, Social Importance, Quantification and Dynamics. Proceedings of the first Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies, Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN, USA, 9–13 May 1998; pp. 35–49.
Castelfranchi, C.; Falcone, R. Socio-Cognitive Model of Trust: Basic Ingredients. 2008. Available online: http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust (accessed on 3 August 2011).
Durante, M. Rethinking Human Identity in the Age of Autonomic Computing: The Philosophical Idea of the Trace. In The Philosophy of Law Meets the Philosophy of Technology: Autonomic Computing and Transformations of Human Agency; Hildebrandt, M., Rouvroy, A., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2011; pp. 85–103.
Kephart, J.O.; Chess, D.M. The Vision of Autonomic Computing. Manifesto; IEEE Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2003. Available online: http://www.research.ibm.com/autonomic/research/papers (accessed on 3 August 2011).
Rouvroy, A. Governmentality in an Age of Autonomic Computing: Technology, Virtuality and Utopia. In The Philosophy of Law Meets the Philosophy of Technology: Autonomic Computing and Transformations of Human Agency; Hildebrandt, M., Rouvroy, A., Eds.; Routledge: Oxford, UK, 2011. (forthcoming).
Boyd, D. Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. In Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites; Papacharissi, Z., Ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2010; pp. 39–58.
Steeves, V.; Webster, C. Closing the barn door: The effect of parental supervision on Canadian children's online privacy. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2008, 28, 4–19.
Boyd, D. Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics. In Youth, Identity and Digital Media; Buckingham, D., Ed.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2007; pp. 119–142.
Marwick, A.E.; Diaz, D.M.; Palfrey, J. Youth, privacy and reputation (literature review). Berkman Center Intern. Soc. Res. Publ. Ser. 2010, 5. Available online: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/publications/2010/Youth_Privacy_Reputation_Lit_Review (accessed on 3 August 2011).
Hinduja, S.; Patchin, J.W. Personal information of adolescents on the Internet: A quantitative content analysis of MySpace. J. Adolesc. 2008, 31, 125–146.
Kallinikos, J. The Consequences of Information. Institutional Implications of Technological Change; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA, USA, 2006.
Nissenbaum, H. Will Security Enhance Trust Online, or Supplant It? In Trust and Distrust Within Organizations: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions; Kramer, R., Cook, K., Eds.; Russel Sage Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2004; pp. 155–188.
Christofides, E.; Muise, A.; Desmarais, S. Information disclosure and control on facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? Cyberpsychol. Behav. 2009, 12, 341–345.
Valkenburg, P.M.; Peter, J. The Effect of instant messaging on the quality of adolescents' existing friendships: A longitudinal study. J. Commun. 2009, 59, 79–97.
Barnes, S. A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 2006, 11. Available online: http://www.firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1394 (accessed on 3 August 2011).
Herring, S.C. Questioning the Generational Divide: Technological Exoticism and Adult Construction of Online Youth Identity. In Youth, Identity and Digital Media; Buckingham, D., Ed.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2007; pp. 71–94.
Youn, S. Determinants of online privacy concern and its influence on privacy protection behaviors among young adolescents. J. Consum. Aff. 2009, 43, 389–418.
