The paper describes rich, a new R package to perform species richness estimation and comparison. Species richness is the simplest surrogate for the more complex concept of species biodiversity. It is relatively easy to assess although estimations strongly depend on sampling intensity with the consequence that richness estimations should be standardized to perform valid comparisons. The R package rich allows such corrections as well as the computation of various statistics and implements different randomization tests to compare cumulative and average species richness of two communities. These tests are useful for ranking sites or communities which is a classical goal in restoration ecology and conservation biology.
References
[1]
Magurran, A. Measuring Biological Diversity; Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK, 2004.
[2]
Kerr, J. Species richness, endemism, and the choice of areas for conservation. Conserv. Biol.？1997, 11, 1094–1100, doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96089.x.
[3]
Caro, T.; O'Doherty, G. On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. Conserv. Biol.？1999, 13, 805–814, doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98338.x.
[4]
Mathieu, J.; Rossi, J.P.; Mora, P.; Lavelle, P.; Martins, P.F.D.S.; Rouland, C.; Grimaldi, M. Recovery of soil macrofauna communities after forest clearance in Eastern Amazonia, Brazil. Conserv. Biol.？2005, 19, 1598–1605, doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00200.x.
[5]
Rossi, J.P.; van Halder, I. Towards indicators of butterfly biodiversity based on a multiscale landscape description. Ecol. Indicat.？2010, 10, 452–458, doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.016.
[6]
Rossi, J.P. Extrapolation and biodiversity indicators: handle with caution! Ecol. Indicat.？2011, doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.09.002.
[7]
Hellmann, J.; Fowler, G. Bias, precision, and accuracy of four measures of species richness. Ecol. Appl.？1999, 9, 824–834, doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0824:BPAAOF]2.0.CO;2.
[8]
Colwell, R.K.; Coddington, J.A. Estimating Terrestrial Biodiversity through Extrapolation. Phil. Trans.R. Soc. Lond. B？1994, 345, 101–118, doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0091.
[9]
Gotelli, N.; Colwell, R. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett.？2001, 4, 379–391, doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x.
[10]
R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2009.
[11]
Rossi, J.P.; Mathieu, J.; Cooper, M.; Grimaldi, M. Soil macrofaunal biodiversity in Amazonian pastures: Matching sampling with patterns. Soil Biol. Biochem.？2006, 38, 2178–2187, doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.01.020.
[12]
Manly, B. Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1997.
[13]
Canty, A.; Ripley, B.D. boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions; 2009. R package version 1.2-41.
[14]
Oksanen, J.; Blanchet, F.G.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; O'Hara, R.B.; Simpson, G.L.; Solymos, P.; Stevens, M.H.H.; Wagner, H. vegan: Community Ecology Package; 2010. R package version 1.17-3.
[15]
Rossi, J.P.; Celini, L.; Mora, P.; Mathieu, J.; Lapied, E.; Nahmani, J.; Ponge, J.F.; Lavelle, P. Decreasing fallow duration in tropical slash-and-burn agriculture alters soil macro-invertebrate diversity: A case study in southern French Guiana. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.？2010, 135, 148–154, doi:10.1016/j.agee.2009.08.012.
