All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

PLOS ONE  2011 

The Effect of Structural Complexity, Prey Density, and “Predator-Free Space” on Prey Survivorship at Created Oyster Reef Mesocosms

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028339

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Interactions between predators and their prey are influenced by the habitat they occupy. Using created oyster (Crassostrea virginica) reef mesocosms, we conducted a series of laboratory experiments that created structure and manipulated complexity as well as prey density and “predator-free space” to examine the relationship between structural complexity and prey survivorship. Specifically, volume and spatial arrangement of oysters as well as prey density were manipulated, and the survivorship of prey (grass shrimp, Palaemonetes pugio) in the presence of a predator (wild red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus) was quantified. We found that the presence of structure increased prey survivorship, and that increasing complexity of this structure further increased survivorship, but only to a point. This agrees with the theory that structural complexity may influence predator-prey dynamics, but that a threshold exists with diminishing returns. These results held true even when prey density was scaled to structural complexity, or the amount of “predator-free space” was manipulated within our created reef mesocosms. The presence of structure and its complexity (oyster shell volume) were more important in facilitating prey survivorship than perceived refugia or density-dependent prey effects. A more accurate indicator of refugia might require “predator-free space” measures that also account for the available area within the structure itself (i.e., volume) and not just on the surface of a structure. Creating experiments that better mimic natural conditions and test a wider range of “predator-free space” are suggested to better understand the role of structural complexity in oyster reefs and other complex habitats.

References

[1]  Bell S, McCoy E, Mushinsky H (1991) Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman & Hall: 3–27.
[2]  Wilcove DS (1985) Nest predation in forest tracts and the decline of migratory songbirds. Ecology 66: 1211–1214.
[3]  Paine RT (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. American Naturalist 100: 65–75.
[4]  Huffaker C (1958) Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27: 343–383.
[5]  Beukers JS, Jones GP (1997) Habitat complexity modifies the impact of piscivores on a coral reef fish population. Oecologia 114: 50–59.
[6]  Grabowski JH (2004) Habitat complexity disrupts predator-prey interactions but not the trophic cascade on oyster reefs. Ecology 85: 995–1004.
[7]  Finke DL, Denno RF (2002) Intraguild predation diminished in complex structured vegetation: implications for prey suppression. Ecology 83: 643–652.
[8]  Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, et al. (1986) Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research 15: 133–302.
[9]  Persson L, Ekl?v P (1995) Prey refuges affecting interactions between piscivorous perch and juvenile perch and roach. Ecology 76: 70–81.
[10]  Warfe DM, Barmuta LA (2004) Habitat structural complexity mediates the foraging success of multiple predator species. Oecologia 141: 171–178.
[11]  Van De Koppel J, Huisman J, Van Der Wal R, Olff H (1996) Patterns of herbivory along a prouductivity gradient: An empirical and theoretical investigation. Ecology. pp. 736–745.
[12]  Underwood R (1982) Vigilance behaviour in grazing African antelopes. Behaviour. pp. 81–107.
[13]  Rilov G, Figueira WF, Lyman SJ, Crowder LB (2007) Complex habitats may not always benefit prey: linking visual field with reef fish behavior and distribution. Marine Ecology Progress Series 329: 225–238.
[14]  Nelson WG (1979) Experimental studies of selective predation on amphipods - consequences for amphipod distribution and abundance. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 38: 225–245.
[15]  Coen LD, Heck KL, Abele LG (1981) Experiments on competition and predation among shrimps of seagrass meadows. Ecology 62: 1484–1493.
[16]  Russo AR (1987) Role of habitat complexity in mediating predation by the gray damselfish Abudefduf sordidus on epiphytal amphipods. Marine Ecology Progress Series 36: 101–105.
[17]  Graham S, Davis J, Deegan L, Cebrian J, Hughes J, et al. (1998) Effect of eelgrass (Zostera marina) density on the feeding efficiency of mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus). Biological Bulletin. pp. 241–243.
[18]  Bartholomew A, Diaz RJ, Cicchetti G (2000) New dimensionless indices of structural habitat complexity: predicted and actual effects on a predator's foraging success. Marine Ecology Progress Series 206: 45–58.
[19]  Manatunge J, Asaeda T, Priyadarshana T (2000) The influence of structural complexity on fish–zooplankton interactions: a study using artificial submerged macrophytes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 58: 425–438.
[20]  Bartholomew A (2002) Faunal colonization of artificial seagrass plots: the importance of surface area versus space size relative to body size. Estuaries and Coasts 25: 1045–1052.
[21]  Hovel KA, Lipcius RN (2001) Habitat fragmentation in a seagrass landscape: Patch size and complexity control blue crab survival. Ecology 82: 1814–1829.
[22]  Canion CR, Heck KL (2009) Effect of habitat complexity on predation success: re-evaluating the current paradigm in seagrass beds. Marine Ecology Progress Series 393: 37–46.
[23]  Mattila J, Heck KL JR, Miller E, Gustafsson C, Williams S, et al. (2008) Increased habitat structure does not always provide increased refuge from predation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 361: 15–20.
[24]  Stunz GW, Minello TJ (2001) Habitat-related predation on juvenile wild-caught and hatchery-reared red drum Sciaenops ocellatus (Linnaeus). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 260: 13–25.
[25]  Heck KL, Thoman TA (1981) Experiments on predator-prey interactions in vegetated aquatic habitats. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 53: 125–134.
[26]  Rozas LP, Odum WE (1988) Occupation of submerged aquatic vegetation by fishes: testing the roles of food and refuge. Oecologia 77: 101–106.
[27]  McCoy E, Bell S (1991) Habitat structure: The evolution and diversification of a complex topic. Popul Community Biol Ser. pp. 3–27.
[28]  Dibble ED, Killgore KJ, Dick GO (1996) Measurement of plant architecture in seven aquatic plants. Journal Of Freshwater Ecology 11: 311–318.
[29]  Beck MW (1998) Comparison of the measurement and effects of habitat structure on gastropods in rocky intertidal and mangrove habitats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 169: 165–178.
[30]  Downes BJ, Lake P, Schreiber E, Glaister A (1998) Habitat structure and regulation of local species diversity in a stony, upland stream. Ecological Monographs 68: 237–257.
[31]  Warfe DM, Barmuta LA, Wotherspoon S (2008) Quantifying habitat structure: surface convolution and living space for species in complex environments. Oikos 117: 1764–1773.
[32]  Stoner AW, Lewis FG (1985) The influence of quantitative and qualitative aspects of habitat complexity in tropical seagrass meadows. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 94: 19–40.
[33]  Halley J, Hartley S, Kallimanis A, Kunin W, Lennon J, et al. (2004) Uses and abuses of fractal methodology in ecology. Ecology Letters 7: 254–271.
[34]  Schmid P (1999) Fractal properties of habitat and patch structure in benthic ecosystems. Advances In Ecological Research 30: 339–401.
[35]  Coen LD, Brumbaugh RD, Bushek D, Grizzle R, Luckenbach MW, et al. (2007) Ecosystem services related to oyster restoration. Marine Ecology Progress Series 341: 303–307.
[36]  Stunz G, Minello T, Rozas L (2010) Relative value of oyster reef as habitat for estuarine nekton in Galveston Bay, Texas. Marine Ecology Progress Series 406: 147–159.
[37]  Pattillo M, Czapla E, Nelson D, Monaco M (1997) Distribution and abundance of fishes and invertebrates in Gulf of Mexico estuaries, Volume II: Species life history summaries.
[38]  Harding JM, Mann R (2001) Oyster reefs as fish habitat: Opportunistic use of restored reefs by transient fishes. Journal of Shellfish Research 20: 951–959.
[39]  Boothby RN, Avault JW (1971) Food habits, length-weight relationship, and condition factor of red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) in southeastern Louisiana. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 100:
[40]  Liao IC, Chang EY (2003) Role of sensory mechanisms in predatory feeding behavior of juvenile red drum Sciaenops ocellatus. Fisheries Science 69: 317–322.
[41]  Scharf FS, Schlicht KK (2000) Feeding habits of red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) in Galveston Bay, Texas: Seasonal diet variation and predator-prey size relationships. Estuaries 23: 128–139.
[42]  Leight AK, Scott GI, Fulton MH, Daugomah JW (2005) Long term monitoring of grass shrimp Palaemonetes spp. population metrics at sites with agricultural runoff influences. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45: 143–150.
[43]  Zimmerman RJ, Center SF, Galveston L (1989) Oyster Reef as Habitat for Estuarine Macrofauna: US Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Center, Galveston Laboratory
[44]  Eggleston DB, Elis WE, Etherington LL, Dahlgren CP, Posey MH (1999) Organism responses to habitat fragmentation and diversity: Habitat colonization by estuarine macrofauna. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 236: 107–132.
[45]  Minello T (1999) Nekton densities in shallow estuarine habitats of Texas and Louisiana and the identification of essential fish habitat. Fish habitat:essential fish habitat and rehabilitation. American Fisheries Society Symposium 43–75.
[46]  Breitburg D (1999) Are 3-dimensional structure and healthy oyster populations the keys to an ecologically interesting and important fish community. (in) Oyster reef habitat restoration: a synopsis and synthesis of approaches. Williamsburg, VA: Virginia Institute of Marine Science Press. pp. 238–249.
[47]  Coen LD, Luckenbach MW (2000) Developing success criteria and goals for evaluating oyster reef restoration: Ecological function or resource exploitation? Ecological Engineering 15: 323–343.
[48]  Harding JM, Mann R (1999) Fish species richness in relation to restored oyster reefs, Piankatank River, Virginia. Bulletin of Marine Science 65: 289–299.
[49]  Holbrook SJ, Schmitt RJ (2002) Competition for shelter space causes density-dependent predation mortality in damselfishes. Ecology 83: 2855–2868.
[50]  Orth RJ, Heck KL, Vanmontfrans J (1984) Faunal communities in seagrass beds - a review of the influence of plant structure and prey characteristics on predator prey relationships. Estuaries 7: 339–350.
[51]  Kotler BP, Brown JS, Hasson O (1991) Factors affecting gerbil foraging behavior and rates of owl predation. Ecology. pp. 2249–2260.
[52]  Riginos C, Grace JB (2008) Savanna tree density, herbivores, and the herbaceous community: bottom-up vs. top-down effects. Ecology 89: 2228–2238.
[53]  Humphries AT, La Peyre MK, Kimball ME, Rozas LP (in press).
[54]  Soluk DA, Collins NC (1988) Synergistic interactions between fish and stoneflies: facilitation and interference among stream predators. Oikos 52: 94–100.
[55]  Grabowski JH, Hughes AR, Kimbro DL (2008) Habitat complexity influences cascading effects of multiple predators. Ecology 89: 3413–3422.
[56]  Grabowski JH, Powers SP (2004) Habitat complexity mitigates trophic transfer on oyster reefs. Marine Ecology Progress Series 277: 291–295.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus