全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

PLOS ONE  2011 

Health Newscasts for Increasing Influenza Vaccination Coverage: An Inductive Reasoning Game Approach

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028300

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Both pandemic and seasonal influenza are receiving more attention from mass media than ever before. Topics such as epidemic severity and vaccination are changing the way in which we perceive the utility of disease prevention. Voluntary influenza vaccination has been recently modeled using inductive reasoning games. It has thus been found that severe epidemics may occur because individuals do not vaccinate and, instead, attempt to benefit from the immunity of their peers. Such epidemics could be prevented by voluntary vaccination if incentives were offered. However, a key assumption has been that individuals make vaccination decisions based on whether there was an epidemic each influenza season; no other epidemiological information is available to them. In this work, we relax this assumption and investigate the consequences of making more informed vaccination decisions while no incentives are offered. We obtain three major results. First, individuals will not cooperate enough to constantly prevent influenza epidemics through voluntary vaccination no matter how much they learned about influenza epidemiology. Second, broadcasting epidemiological information richer than whether an epidemic occurred may stabilize the vaccination coverage and suppress severe influenza epidemics. Third, the stable vaccination coverage follows the trend of the perceived benefit of vaccination. However, increasing the amount of epidemiological information released to the public may either increase or decrease the perceived benefit of vaccination. We discuss three scenarios where individuals know, in addition to whether there was an epidemic, (i) the incidence, (ii) the vaccination coverage and (iii) both the incidence and the vaccination coverage, every influenza season. We show that broadcasting both the incidence and the vaccination coverage could yield either better or worse vaccination coverage than broadcasting each piece of information on its own.

References

[1]  Thomas EA, Goldstone SE (2011) Should I or shouldn't I: Decision making, knowledge and behavioral effects of quadrivalent HPV vaccination in men who have sex with men. Vaccine 29: 570–6.
[2]  Hackett AJ (2008) Risk, its perception and the media: The MMR controversy. Community Pract 81: 22–5.
[3]  Brown KF, Kroll JS, Hudson MJ, Ramsay M, Green J, et al. (2010) Factors underlying parental decisions about combination childhood vaccinations including MMR: A systematic review. Vaccine 28: 4235–48.
[4]  Samba E, Nkrumah F, Leke R (2004) Getting polio eradication back on track in Nigeria. N Engl J Med 350: 645–6.
[5]  Myers LB, Goodwin R (2011) Determinants of adults' intention to vaccinate against pandemic swine flu. BMC Public Health 11: 15.
[6]  Fabry P, Gagneur A, Pasquier JC (2011) Determinants of A (H1N1) vaccination: Cross-sectional study in a population of pregnant women in Quebec. Vaccine 29: 1824–9.
[7]  Liu R, Wu J, Zhu H (2007) Media/psychological impact on multiple outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases. Comput Math Method M 8: 153–64.
[8]  Cui J, Sun Y, Zhu H (2008) The impact of media on the control of infectious diseases. J Dyn Differ Equ 20: 31–53.
[9]  Li Y, Cui J (2009) The effect of constant and pulse vaccination on SIS epidemic models incorporating media coverage. Commun Nonlinear Sci 14: 2353–65.
[10]  Tchuenche J, Dube N, Bhunu C (2011) The impact of media coverage on the transmission dynamics of human influenza. BMC Public Health 11: S5.
[11]  Bauch CT, Galvani AP, Earn DJ (2003) Group interest versus self-interest in smallpox vaccination policy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 10564–7.
[12]  Bauch CT, Earn DJ (2004) Vaccination and the theory of games. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 13391–4.
[13]  Manfredi P, Posta PD, d'Onofrio A, Salinelli E, Centrone F, et al. (2009) Optimal vaccination choice, vaccination games, and rational exemption: An appraisal. Vaccine 28: 98–109.
[14]  Fu F, Rosenbloom DI, Wang L, Nowak MA (2011) Imitation dynamics of vaccination behaviour on social networks. Proc Biol Sci 278: 42–9.
[15]  Arthur WB (1994) Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality. Am Econ Rev 84: 406–11.
[16]  Challet D, Marsili M, Zhang YC (2005) Minority games. Oxford University Press; New York.
[17]  Vardavas R, Breban R, Blower S (2007) Can influenza epidemics be prevented by voluntary vaccination? PLoS Comput Biol 3: e85.
[18]  Breban R, Vardavas R, Blower S (2007) Mean-field analysis of an inductive reasoning game: Application to influenza vaccination. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 76: 031127.
[19]  Cornforth D, Reluga T, Shim E, Bauch CT, Galvani AP, et al. (2011) Erratic flu vaccination emerges from short-sighted behavior in contact networks. PLoS Comput Biol 7: e1001062.
[20]  Ferguson NM, Cummings DA, Cauchemez S, Fraser C, Riley S, et al. (2005) Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in southeast Asia. Nature 437: 209–14.
[21]  Cooper BS, Pitman RJ, Edmunds WJ, Gay NJ (2006) Delaying the international spread of pandemic influenza. PLoS Med 3: e212.
[22]  Halloran ME, Longini IM (2006) Community studies for vaccinating schoolchildren against influenza. Science 311: 615–6.
[23]  Kuznetsov YA (2004) Elements of applied bifurcation theory. Springer-Verlag; New York.
[24]  Ott E (2002) Chaos in dynamical systems. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge.
[25]  Blank P, Schwenkglenks M, Szucs T (2009) Disparities in influenza vaccination coverage rates by target group in five European countries: Trends over seven consecutive seasons. Infection 37: 390–400.
[26]  CDC (2011) Influenza vaccination coverage. URL http://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/vac?cination.
[27]  Weinstein ND (1989) Optimistic biases about personal risks. Science 246: 1232.
[28]  Lloyd AJ (2001) The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments. Quality in Health Care 10: i14–8.
[29]  Thomson R, Edwards A, Grey J (2005) Risk communication in the clinical consultation. Clinical Medicine 5: 465–9.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus