[1] | National Research Council (2009) Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward. (Natl Acad Press, Washington, DC).
|
[2] | Evett IE, Williams RL (1996) A review of the sixteen points fingerprint standard in England and Wales. J Forensic Identification 46: 49–73. Available: http://www.thefingerprintinquiryscotland?.org.uk/inquiry/files/DB_0769-02.pdf.
|
[3] | Gutowski S (2006) Error rates in fingerprint examination: the view in 2006. The Forensic Bulletin Autumn 2006: 18–19.
|
[4] | Langenburg G (2009) A Performance study of the ACE-V process: a pilot study to measure the accuracy, precision, reproducibility, and the biasability of conclusions resulting from the ACE-V process. J Forensic Identification 59(2): 219–257.
|
[5] | Ulery BT, Hicklin RA, Buscaglia J, Roberts MA (2011) Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(19): 7733–7738. Available: http://www.pnas.org/content/108/19/7733.?full.pdf.
|
[6] | Dror IE, Charlton D, Péron AE (2006) Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications. Forensic Sci Int 156: 74–78. Available: http://www.sequentialunmasking.org/su/Dr?or_Contextual_FSI_2006.pdf.
|
[7] | Dror IE, Charlton D (2006) Why experts make errors. J Forensic Identification 56(4): 600–616. Available: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/id/JFI%20ex?pert%20error.pdf.
|
[8] | Risinger DM, Saks MJ, Thompson WC, Rosenthal R (2002) The Daubert/Kumho implications of observer effects in forensic science: hidden problems of expectation and suggestion. Calif Law Rev 90(1): 1–56. Available: http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/3199069.
|
[9] | Langenburg G, Champod C, Wertheim P (2009) Testing for potential contextual bias effects during the verification stage of the ACE-V methodology when conducting fingerprint comparisons. J Forensic Sciences 54(3): 571–582.
|
[10] | SWGFAST (2011) Standards for examining friction ridge impressions and resulting conclusions, version 1.0. Available: http://swgfast.org/Documents.html.
|
[11] | Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1993.
|
[12] | Fleiss JL (1971) Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull 76(5): 378–382.
|
[13] | Gwet K (2002) Kappa statistic is not satisfactory for assessing the extent of agreement between raters. Series: Statistical Methods for Inter-Rater Reliability Assessment 1(1): 1–5. Available: http://www.agreestat.com/research_papers?/kappa_statistic_is_not_satisfactory.pdf.
|
[14] | Rust RT, Cooil B (1994) Reliability measures for qualitative data: theory and implications. J Marketing Res 31: 1–14. Available: http://www2.owen.vanderbilt.edu/bruce.co?oil/Documents/Publications/JMR%201994.pd?f.
|
[15] | Perrault WD Jr, Leigh LE (1989) Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. J Marketing Res 26: 135–148. Available: http://www.viktoria.se/~dixi/BISON/resou?rces/perreault-leigh-1989.pdf.
|
[16] | Brennan RL, Prediger DJ (1981) Coefficient kappa: some uses, misuses, and alternatives. Educational and Psychological Measurement 41: 687–699.
|
[17] | Schuckers ME (2003) Using the beta-binomial distribution to assess performance of a biometric identification device. Int J Image Graph 3(3): 523–529.
|
[18] | Uebersax JS (1992) A review of modeling approaches for the analysis of observer agreement. Investigative Radiology 17: 738–743.
|
[19] | Schiffer B, Champod C (2006) The potential (negative) influence of observational biases at the analysis stage of fingermark individualisation. Forensic Sci Int 167(2–3): 116–120. Available: http://www.sequentialunmasking.org/su/Sc?hiffer_Observational_Bias_2007.pdf.
|
[20] | Dror IE, Champod C, Langenburg G, Charlton D, Hunt H, et al. (2011) Cognitive issues in fingerprint analysis: inter- and intra-expert consistency and the effect of a ‘target’ comparison. Forensic Sci Int 208: 10–17. Available: http://cognitiveconsultantsinternational?.com/Dror_FSI_cognitive_issues_fingerpri?nt_analysis.pdf.
|
[21] | SWGFAST (2011) Standard for the application of blind verification of friction ridge examinations, version 1.0. Available: http://swgfast.org/Documents.html.
|