All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

PLOS ONE  2012 

The Significance of Hair for Face Recognition

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034144

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


Hair is a feature of the head that frequently changes in different situations. For this reason much research in the area of face perception has employed stimuli without hair. To investigate the effect of the presence of hair we used faces with and without hair in a recognition task. Participants took part in trials in which the state of the hair either remained consistent (Same) or switched between learning and test (Switch). It was found that in the Same trials performance did not differ for stimuli presented with and without hair. This implies that there is sufficient information in the internal features of the face for optimal performance in this task. It was also found that performance in the Switch trials was substantially lower than in the Same trials. This drop in accuracy when the stimuli were switched suggests that faces are represented in a holistic manner and that manipulation of the hair causes disruption to this, with implications for the interpretation of some previous studies.


[1]  Frowd C, Bruce V, McIntyre A, Hancock P (2007) The relative importance of external and internal features of facial composites. British Journal of Psychology 98: 61–77.
[2]  Sinha P, Poggio T (1996) I think I know that face. Nature 384: 404–404.
[3]  Sinha P, Poggio T (2002) Last but not least: ‘United’ we stand. Perception 31: 133–133.
[4]  Johnston RA, Edmonds AJ (2009) Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: A review. Memory 17: 577–596.
[5]  Ellis HD, Shepherd JW, Davies GM (1979) Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception 8: 431–439.
[6]  Young AW, Hay DC, McWeeny KH, Flude BM, Ellis AW (1985) Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features. Perception 14: 737–746.
[7]  Bonner L, Burton AM, Bruce V (2003) Getting to know you: How we learn new faces. Visual Cognition 10: 527–536.
[8]  Bruce V, Henderson Z, Greenwood K, Hancock PJB, Burton AM, et al. (1999) Verification of face identities from images captured on video. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied 5: 339–360.
[9]  Nachson I, Shechory M (2002) Effect of inversion on the recognition of external and internal facial features. Acta Psychologica 109: 227–238.
[10]  Megreya AM, Bindemann M (2009) Revisiting the processing of internal and external features of unfamiliar faces:The headscarf effect. Perception 38: 1831–1848.
[11]  Lewin C, Herlitz A (2002) Sex differences in face recognition - Women's faces make the difference. Brain and Cognition 50: 121–128.
[12]  Wright DB, Sladden B (2003) An own gender bias and the importance of hair in face recognition. Acta Psychologica 114: 101–114.
[13]  Want SC, Pascalis O, Coleman M, Blades M (2003) Recognizing people from the inner or outer parts of their faces: Developmental data concerning ‘unfamiliar’ faces. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 21: 125–135.
[14]  Maurer D, Le Grand R, Mondloch CJ (2002) The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 255–260.
[15]  Schneider W, Eschman A, Zuccolotto A (2002) E-Prime User's Guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
[16]  Green DA, Swets JA (1966) Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
[17]  Leder H, Carbon CC (2005) When context hinders! Learn-test compatibility in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a-Human Experimental Psychology 58: 235–250.
[18]  Tanaka JW, Farah MJ (1993) Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a-Human Experimental Psychology 46: 225–245.
[19]  Betts LR, Wilson HR (2010) Heterogeneous Structure in Face-selective Human Occipito-temporal Cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22: 2276–2288.
[20]  Kanwisher N, McDermott J, Chun MM (1997) The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience 17: 4302–4311.
[21]  Sporer SL (2001) Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups - An integration of theories. Psychology Public Policy and Law 7: 36–97.
[22]  Andrews TJ, Davies-Thompson J, Kingstone A, Young AW (2010) Internal and External Features of the Face Are Represented Holistically in Face-Selective Regions of Visual Cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 30: 3544–3552.
[23]  Axelrod V, Yovel G (2010) External facial features modify the representation of internal facial features in the fusiform face area. Neuroimage 52: 720–725.
[24]  Tulving E, Thomson DM (1973) Encoding Specificity and Retrieval Processes in Episodic Memory. Psychological Review 80: 352–373.
[25]  Patterson KE, Baddeley AD (1977) When Face Recognition Fails. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Learning and Memory 3: 406–417.
[26]  Buttle H, East J (2010) Traditional facial tattoos disrupt face recognition processes. Perception 39: 1672–1674.
[27]  Bartlett JC, Searcy J (1993) Inversion and Configuration of faces. Cognitive Psychology 25: 281–316.
[28]  Yin RK (1969) Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81: 141–145.
[29]  Ueda S, Koyama T (2010) Influence of eye-makeup on the perception of gaze direction. Perception 39: 126–126.
[30]  Murray JE (2004) The ups and downs of face perception: Evidence for holistic encoding of upright and inverted faces. Perception 33: 387–398.
[31]  Meissner CA, Brigham JC (2001) Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces - A meta-analytic review. Psychology Public Policy and Law 7: 3–35.
[32]  Office for National Statistics (2001) Census: Standard Area Statistics (England and Wales) JISC Census Programme. Centre for Interaction Data Estimation and Research (University of Leeds).
[33]  Walker PM, Hewstone M (2006) A developmental investigation of other-race contact and the own-race face effect. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 24: 451–463.
[34]  Walker PM, Hewstone M (2006) A perceptual discrimination investigation of the own-race effect and intergroup experience. Applied Cognitive Psychology 20: 461–475.
[35]  Walker PM, Hewstone M (2008) The influence of social factors and implicit racial bias on a generalized own-race effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology 22: 441–453.
[36]  University of Bradford (2011) Reporting Tool for Student Data. Bradford: Strategic Planning Office.


comments powered by Disqus