All Title Author
Keywords Abstract


Negligence, genuine error, and litigation

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S24256

Keywords: medical malpractice, tort reform, no fault compensation, alternative dispute resolution, system errors

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

ligence, genuine error, and litigation Review (786) Total Article Views Authors: Sohn DH Published Date February 2013 Volume 2013:6 Pages 49 - 56 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S24256 Received: 08 September 2012 Accepted: 13 November 2012 Published: 15 February 2013 David H Sohn Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA Abstract: Not all medical injuries are the result of negligence. In fact, most medical injuries are the result either of the inherent risk in the practice of medicine, or due to system errors, which cannot be prevented simply through fear of disciplinary action. This paper will discuss the differences between adverse events, negligence, and system errors; the current medical malpractice tort system in the United States; and review current and future solutions, including medical malpractice reform, alternative dispute resolution, health courts, and no-fault compensation systems. The current political environment favors investigation of non-cap tort reform remedies; investment into more rational oversight systems, such as health courts or no-fault systems may reap both quantitative and qualitative benefits for a less costly and safer health system.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus