All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

PLOS ONE  2012 

Assessing the Congruence of Thermal Niche Estimations Derived from Distribution and Physiological Data. A Test Using Diving Beetles

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048163

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


A basic aim of ecology is to understand the determinants of organismal distribution, the niche concept and species distribution models providing key frameworks to approach the problem. As temperature is one of the most important factors affecting species distribution, the estimation of thermal limits is crucially important for inferring range constraints. It is expectable that thermal physiology data derived from laboratory experiments and species' occurrences may express different aspects of the species' niche. However, there is no study systematically testing this prediction in a given taxonomic group while controlling by potential phylogenetic inertia. We estimate the thermal niches of twelve Palaearctic diving beetles species using physiological data derived from experimental analyses in order to examine the extent to which these coincided with those estimated from distribution models based on observed occurrences. We found that thermal niche estimates derived from both approaches lack general congruence, and these results were similar before and after controlling by phylogeny. The congruence between potential distributions obtained from the two different procedures was also explored, and we found again that the percentage of agreement were not very high (~60%). We confirm that both thermal niche estimates derived from geographical and physiological data are likely to misrepresent the true range of climatic variation that these diving beetles are able to tolerate, and so these procedures could be considered as incomplete but complementary estimations of an inaccessible reality.


[1]  Whittaker RH, Levin SA, Root RB (1973) Niche, habitat and ecotope. Am. Nat. 10: 321–338.
[2]  Colwell RK (1992) Niche: a bifurcation in the conceptual linage of the term. In: Keller EF, Lloyd E, editors. A. Keywords in evolutionary biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 241–248.
[3]  Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135: 147–186.
[4]  Soberón J, Peterson AT (2005) Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species' distributional areas. Biodivers Inform 2: 1–10.
[5]  Peterson AT (2006) Uses and requirements of ecological niche models and related distributional models. Biodivers Inform 3: 59–72.
[6]  Jiménez-Valverde A, Peterson AT, Soberón J, Overton JM, Aragón P, et al. (2011) Use of niche models in invasive species risk assessments. Biol Invasions 13: 2785–2797.
[7]  Soberón J, Nakamura M (2009) Niches and distributional areas: concepts, methods, and assumptions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 644–19 650.
[8]  Sánchez-Fernández D, Lobo JM, Hernández-Manrique OL (2011) Species distribution models that do not incorporate global data misrepresent potential distributions: a case study using Iberian diving beetles. Divers Distrib 17: 163–171.
[9]  Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Morrison ML, Haufler JB, Raphael MG, et al.. (2002) Predicting species occurrences: issues of scale and accuracy. Washington DC: Island Press. 840 p.
[10]  Colwell RK, Rangel TF (2009) Hutchinson's duality: the once and future niche. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 19651–19658.
[11]  Kearny M (2006) Habitat, environment and niche: what are we modelling? Oikos 15: 186–191.
[12]  Kearney M, Porter WP, Williams C, Ritchie S, Hoffmann AA (2009) Integrating biophysical models and evolutionary theory to predict climatic impacts on species' ranges: the dengue mosquito Aedes aegypti in Australia. Funct Ecol 23: 528–538.
[13]  Calosi P, Bilton DT, Spicer JI, Votier S, Atfield A (2010) What determines a species geographical range? Thermal biology and latitudinal range size relationships in European diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). J Anim Ecol 79: 194–204.
[14]  Kearney M, Porter W (2009) Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species ranges. Ecol Lett 12: 334–350.
[15]  Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8: 993–1009.
[16]  Gaston KJ, Chown SL (1999) Elevation and climatic tolerance: a test using dung beetles. Oikos 86: 584–590.
[17]  Stillman JH (2002) Causes and consequences of thermal tolerance limits in rocky intertidal porcelain crabs, genus Petrolisthes. Integ and Comp Biol 42: 790–796.
[18]  Somero G (2005) Linking biogeography to physiology: evolutionary and acclamatory adjustments of thermal limits. Front Zool 2: 1.
[19]  Verdú JR, Lobo JM (2008) Ecophysiology of thermoregulation in endothermic dung beetles: ecological and geographical implications. In: Fattorini S, editor. Insect Ecology and Conservation. Kerala: Research SignPost. 1–28.
[20]  Calosi P, Bilton DT, Spicer JI, Atfield A (2008) Thermal tolerance and geographical range size in the Agabus brunneus group of European diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). J Biogeogr 35: 295–305.
[21]  Gaston KJ, Chown SL, Calosi P, Bernardo J, Bilton DT, et al. (2009) Macrophysiology: a conceptual reunification. Am Nat 174: 595–612.
[22]  Bozinovic F, Calosi P, Spicer JI (2011) Physiological correlates of geographic range in animals. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 42: 155–179.
[23]  Sánchez-Fernández D, Lobo JM, Abellán P, Ribera I, Millán A (2008) Bias in freshwater biodiversity sampling: the case of Iberian water beetles. Divers Distrib. 14: 754–762.
[24]  Latella L, Ruffo S, Stoch F (2007) The project CKmap (Checklist and distribution of the Italian fauna) methods and informatical techniques. Mem Mus Civ Stor Natur Verona 17: 15–19.
[25]  Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global areas. Int J Climatol 25: 1965–1978.
[26]  Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Second english edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishers. 853 p.
[27]  Rundle SD, Bilton DT, Abbott JC, Foggo A (2007) Range size in North American Enallagma damselflies correlates with wing size. Freshwater Biol 52: 471–477.
[28]  Abellán P & Ribera I (2011) Geographic location and phylogeny are the main determinants of the size of the geographical range in aquatic beetles. BMC Evol Biol 11: 344.
[29]  Martins EP, Hansen TF (1997) Phylogenies and the comparative method: A general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am Nat 149: 646–667.
[30]  Martins EP (2004) Computer programs for the statistical analysis of comparative data. Available: Department of Biology, Indiana University. Accessed 2012 Aug 3.
[31]  Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20: 289–290.
[32]  Galewski K (1971) A Study on Morphobiotic Adaptations of European species of the Dytiscidae (Coleoptera) Pol Pis Entomol. 41: 487–702.
[33]  Willmer PG (1982) Microclimate and the environmental physiology of insects. Adv Ins Physiol 16: 1–57.
[34]  Casey TM (1992) Biophysical ecology and heat exchange in insects. Amer Zool 32: 225–237.
[35]  Chown SL, Nicolson WN (2004) Insect physiological ecology: mechanisms and patterns. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 254 p.
[36]  Block W (1990) Cold tolerance of insects and other arthropods. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 326: 613–633.
[37]  Thompson K, Gaston KJ, Band SR (1999) Range size, dispersal and niche breadth in the herbaceous flora of central England. J Ecol 87: 150–155.
[38]  Davis MB, Shaw RG, Etterson JR (2005) Evolutionary responses to changing climate. Ecology 86: 1704–1714.
[39]  Terblanche JS, Klok JC, Krafsur ES, Chown SL (2006) Phenotypic plasticity and geographic variation in thermal tolerance and water loss of the tsetse Glossina pallidipes (Diptera: Glossinidae): implications for distribution modelling. Am J Trop Med Hyg 74: 786–794.
[40]  Chown SL, Terblanche JS (2007) Physiological diversity in insects: ecological and evolutionary contexts. Adv Insect Physiol 33: 50–152.
[41]  Gaston KJ (2003) The Structure and Dynamics of Geographic Ranges. New York: Oxford University Press. 280 p.
[42]  Lamoreux JF, Morrison JC, Ricketts TH, Olson DM, Dinerstein E, et al. (2006) Global tests of biodiversity concordance and the importance of endemism. Nature 440: 212–214.
[43]  Hortal J, Jiménez-Valverde A, Gómez JF, Lobo JM, Baselga A (2008) Historical bias in biodiversity inventories affects the observed environmental niche of the species. Oikos 117: 847–858.
[44]  Buckley LB, Urban MC, Angilletta MJ, Crozier LG, Rissler LJ, et al. (2010) Can mechanism inform species' distribution models? Ecol Lett 13: 1041–1054.
[45]  Angert AL, Sheth SN, Paul JR (2011) Incorporating population-level variation in thermal performance into predictions of geographic range shifts. Integr Comp Biol 51: 733–750.
[46]  Paaijmans KP, Read AF, Thomas MB (2009) Understanding the link between malaria risk and climate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 13844–13849.
[47]  S?rensen JG, Dahlgaard J, Loeschcke V (2001) Genetic variation in thermal tolerance among natural populations of Drosophila buzzatii: down regulation of Hsp70 expression and variation in heat stress resistance traits. Funct Ecol 15: 289–296.
[48]  Krenek S, Petzoldt T, Berendonk TU (2012) Coping with Temperature at the Warm Edge – Patterns of Thermal Adaptation in the Microbial Eukaryote Paramecium caudatum. PLoS ONE 7: e30598.
[49]  Sánchez-Fernández D, Lobo JM, Millán A, Ribera I (2012) Habitat type mediates equilibrium with climatic conditions in the distribution of Iberian diving beetles. Glob Ecol Biogeogr (DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00743.x). In press.
[50]  Aragón P, Baselga A, Lobo JM (2010) Global estimation of invasion risk zones for the western corn rootworm Diabrotica virgifera virgifera: integrating distribution models and physiological thresholds to assess climatic favourability. J Appl Ecol 47: 1026–1035.
[51]  Jiménez-Valverde A, Lobo JM, Hortal J (2008) Not as good as they seem: the importance of concepts in species distribution modelling. Divers Distrib 14: 885–890.
[52]  Guisan A, Broennimann O, Engler R, Yoccoz NG, Vust M, et al. (2006) Using niche-based models to improve the sampling of rare species. Cons Biol 20: 501–511.
[53]  Peterson AT, Soberón J, Sánchez-Cordero V (1999) Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285: 1265–1267.
[54]  Martínez-Meyer E, Peterson AT (2006) Conservatism of ecological niche characteristics in North American plant species over the Pleistocene-to-Recent transition. J Biogeogr 33: 1779–1789.
[55]  Araújo MB, Rahbek C (2006) How does climate change affect biodiversity? Science 313: 1396–1397.
[56]  Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araújo MB, Sykes M, Prentice IC (2005) Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 8245–8250.
[57]  Cabeza M, Araújo MB, Wilson RJ, Thomas CD, Cowley MJR, et al. (2004) Combining probabilities of occurrence with spatial reserve design. J Appl Ecol 41: 252–262.
[58]  Peterson AT (2003) Predicting the geography of species' invasions via ecological niche modeling. Q Rev Biol 78: 419–433.
[59]  Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Pysek P, Midgley GF, Hughes GO, et al. (2005) Niche-based modelling as a tool for predicting the global risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Glob Change Biol 11: 2234–2250.


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us


微信:OALib Journal