All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

PLOS ONE  2009 

The Brightness of Colour

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005091

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


Background The perception of brightness depends on spatial context: the same stimulus can appear light or dark depending on what surrounds it. A less well-known but equally important contextual phenomenon is that the colour of a stimulus can also alter its brightness. Specifically, stimuli that are more saturated (i.e. purer in colour) appear brighter than stimuli that are less saturated at the same luminance. Similarly, stimuli that are red or blue appear brighter than equiluminant yellow and green stimuli. This non-linear relationship between stimulus intensity and brightness, called the Helmholtz-Kohlrausch (HK) effect, was first described in the nineteenth century but has never been explained. Here, we take advantage of the relative simplicity of this ‘illusion’ to explain it and contextual effects more generally, by using a simple Bayesian ideal observer model of the human visual ecology. We also use fMRI brain scans to identify the neural correlates of brightness without changing the spatial context of the stimulus, which has complicated the interpretation of related fMRI studies. Results Rather than modelling human vision directly, we use a Bayesian ideal observer to model human visual ecology. We show that the HK effect is a result of encoding the non-linear statistical relationship between retinal images and natural scenes that would have been experienced by the human visual system in the past. We further show that the complexity of this relationship is due to the response functions of the cone photoreceptors, which themselves are thought to represent an efficient solution to encoding the statistics of images. Finally, we show that the locus of the response to the relationship between images and scenes lies in the primary visual cortex (V1), if not earlier in the visual system, since the brightness of colours (as opposed to their luminance) accords with activity in V1 as measured with fMRI. Conclusions The data suggest that perceptions of brightness represent a robust visual response to the likely sources of stimuli, as determined, in this instance, by the known statistical relationship between scenes and their retinal responses. While the responses of the early visual system (receptors in this case) may represent specifically the statistics of images, post receptor responses are more likely represent the statistical relationship between images and scenes. A corollary of this suggestion is that the visual cortex is adapted to relate the retinal image to behaviour given the statistics of its past interactions with the sources of retinal images:


[1]  Fairchild MD (1998) Color Appearance Models. 1st ed. Reading, , MS: Addison Wesley.
[2]  Sharpe LT, Stockman A, Jagla W, J?gle H (2005) A luminous efficiency function, V*(lambda), for daylight adaptation. J Vis 5: 948–68.
[3]  Lennie P, Pokorny J, Smith VC (1993) Luminance. J Opt Soc Am A 10: 1283–1293.
[4]  Osorio D, Vorobyev M (2005) Photoreceptor spectral sensitivities in terrestrial animals: adaptations for luminance and colour vision. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272: 1745–1752.
[5]  Pridmore RW (2007) Effects of luminance, wavelength and purity on the color attributes: Brief review with new data and perspectives. Color Research & Application 32: 208–222.
[6]  von Helmholtz HLF (1867/1924) Treatise on Physiological Optics (1924 Southall translation). Rochester, , NY: The Optical Society of America.
[7]  Wyszecki G (1967) Correlate for lightness in terms of CIE chromaticity coordinates and luminous reflectance. J Opt Soc Am 57: 254–257.
[8]  Nayatani Y (1998) A colorimetric explanation of the Helmholtz-Kohlrausch effect. Color Res Appl 23: 374–378.
[9]  Ayama M, Ikeda M (1998) Brightness-to-luminance ratio of colored light in the entire chromaticity diagram. Color Res Appl 23: 274–287.
[10]  Knill DC, Richards W (1996) Perception as Bayesian Inference. Cambridge: CUP.
[11]  Purves D, Lotto RB (2003) Why we see what we do. Sunderland, , MA: Sinauer Associates.
[12]  Long F, Purves D (2003) Natural scene statistics as the universal basis of color context effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 15190–15193.
[13]  Howe CQ, Purves D (2005) Natural-scene geometry predicts the perception of angles and line orientation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 1228–1233.
[14]  Gurney K (2007) Neural networks for perceptual processing: from simulation tools to theories. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362: 339–53.
[15]  Corney DPA, Lotto RB (2007) What Are Lightness Illusions and Why Do We See Them? PLoS Comput Biol 3: e180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030180.
[16]  Geisler WS (2003) Ideal Observer analysis. In: Chalupa L, Werner J, editors. The Visual Neurosciences. Boston: MIT press. pp. 825–837.
[17]  Boots B, Nundy S, Purves D (2007) Evolution of visually guided behavior in artificial agents. Network: Comput Neural Syst 18: 11–34.
[18]  Regan BC, Julliot C, Simmen B, Viénot F, Charles-Dominique P, et al. (2001) Fruits, foliage and the evolution of primate colour vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 356(1407): 229–283. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0773.
[19]  Thomson EE, Kristan WB (2005) Quantifying Stimulus Discriminability: A Comparison of Information Theory and Ideal Observer Analysis. Neural Comp 17: 741–778.
[20]  Brainard DH, Williams DR, Hofer H (2008) Trichromatic reconstruction from the interleaved cone mosaic: Bayesian model and the color appearance of small spots. Journal of Vision 8: 1–23.
[21]  Maloney LT (1986) Evaluation of linear models of surface spectral reflectance with small numbers of parameters. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 3: 1673–1683.
[22]  Wachtler T, Lee T, Sejnowski TJ (2001) Chromatic structure of natural scenes. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 18: 65–77.
[23]  Oxtoby EK, Foster DH (2005) Perceptual limits on low-dimensional models of Munsell reflectance spectra. Perception 34: 961–966.
[24]  Foster DH, Amano K, Nascimento SMC, Foster MJ (2006) Frequency of metamerism in natural scenes. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 23: 2359–2372.
[25]  Stockman A, Sharpe LT (2000) The spectral sensitivities of the middle- and long-wavelength-sensitive cones derived from measurements in observers of known genotype. Vision Res 40: 1711–1737.
[26]  Bowmaker JK, Heath LA, Wilkie SE, Hunt DM (1997) Visual pigments and oil droplets from six classes of photoreceptor in the retinas of birds. Vision Research 37: 2183–94.
[27]  MacEvoy SP, Paradiso MA (2001) Lightness constancy in primary visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98: 8827–8831.
[28]  Haynes JD, Lotto RB, Rees G (2004) Responses of human visual cortex to uniform surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 4286–4291.
[29]  Cornelissen FW, Wade AR, Vladusich T, Dougherty RF, Wandell BA (2006) No Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence for Brightness and Color Filling-In In Early Human Visual Cortex. J Neurosci 26: 3634–3641.
[30]  Roe AW, Lu HD, Hung CP (2005) Cortical processing of a brightness illusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Mar 8;102: 3869–74.
[31]  Boyaci H, Fang F, Murray SO, Kersten D (2007) Responses to lightness variations in early human visual cortex. Curr Biol Jun 5;17(11): 989–93.
[32]  Mullen KT, Dumoulin SO, McMahon KL, Zubicaray GID, Hess RF (2007) Selectivity of human retinotopic visual cortex to S-cone-opponent, L/M-cone-opponent and achromatic stimulation. European Journal of Neuroscience 25: 491–502.
[33]  Andrews TJ, Lotto RB (2004) Fusion and Rivalry Are Dependent on the Perceptual Meaning of Visual Stimuli. Curr Biol 14: 418–423.
[34]  Lotto RB, Chittka L (2005) Seeing the light: Illumination as a contextual cue to color choice behavior in bumblebees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 3852–3856.
[35]  Lotto RB, Wicklein M (2005) Bees encode behaviorally significant spectral relationships in complex scenes to resolve stimulus ambiguity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 16870–16874.
[36]  Schlessinger E, Bentley PJ, Lotto RB (2005) Evolving Visually Guided Agents in an Ambiguous Virtual World. pp. 115–120. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference GECCO'05, Washington DC.
[37]  Kaiser PK, Boynton RM (1996) Human color vision. Washington, DC: Optical Society of America.
[38]  Lewis A, Zhaoping L (2006) Are cone sensitivities determined by natural color statistics? J Vision 6: 285–302.
[39]  Webster MA, Mollon JD (1997) Adaptation and the color statistics of natural images. Vision Res 37: 3283–3298.
[40]  von der Twer T, Macleod DIA (2001) Optimal nonlinear codes for the perception of natural colours. Network: Comput Neural Syst 12: 395–407.
[41]  Long F, Yang Z, Purves D (2006) Spectral statistics in natural scenes predict hue, saturation, and brightness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 6013–6018.
[42]  Brainard DH, Freeman WT (1997) Bayesian color constancy. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 14: 1393–411.
[43]  Hung CP, Ramsden BM, Chen LM, Roe AW (2001) Building surfaces from borders in Areas 17 and 18 of the cat. Vision Res 41: 1389–1407.
[44]  Stockman A, Plummer DJ (2005) Long-wavelength adaptation reveals slow, spectrally opponent inputs to the human luminance pathway. J Vis 5: 702–716.
[45]  Stockman A, Plummer DJ (2005) Spectrally opponent inputs to the human luminance pathway: slow+ L and-M cone inputs revealed by low to moderate long-wavelength adaptation. J Physiol 566: 77–91.
[46]  Stockman A, Plummer DJ, Montag ED (2005) Spectrally opponent inputs to the human luminance pathway: slow+ M and-L cone inputs revealed by intense long-wavelength adaptation. J Physiol 566: 61–76.
[47]  Lennie P, Krauskopf J, Sclar G (1990) Chromatic mechanisms in striate cortex of macaque. J Neurosci 10: 649–69.
[48]  Conway BR (2001) Spatial structure of cone inputs to color cells in alert macaque primary visual cortex (V-1). J Neurosci 21: 2768–2783.
[49]  Johnson EN, Hawken MJ, Shapley R (2004) Cone Inputs in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex. J Neurophysiol 91: 2501–2514.
[50]  Murray SO, Boyaci H, Kersten D (2006) The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 9: 429–434.
[51]  Foster DH, Nascimento SMC, Amano K (2004) Information limits on neural identification of colored surfaces in natural scenes. Visual neuroscience 21: 331–6.
[52]  Wandell BA, Chial S, Backus BT (2000) Visualization and measurement of the cortical surface. J Cog Neurosci 12: 739–752.
[53]  Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, Poline JP, Frith CD, et al. (1995) Statistical Parametric Maps in Functional Imaging: A General Linear Approach. Hum Brain Mapp 2: 189–210.


comments powered by Disqus