Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99

Paper Submission

Views	Downloads

Relative Articles
Burkholderia pseudomallei Is Genetically Diverse in Agricultural Land in Northeast Thailand
Activation of Toll-like receptors by Burkholderia pseudomallei
Genetic Diversity and Microevolution of Burkholderia pseudomallei in the Environment
Autotransporters and Their Role in the Virulence of Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei
Porin Involvement in Cephalosporin and Carbapenem Resistance of Burkholderia pseudomallei
Survival of Burkholderia pseudomallei in Water
Development of ceftazidime resistance in an acute Burkholderia pseudomallei infection
The In Vitro Antibiotic Susceptibility of Malaysian Isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei
Molecular Basis of Rare Aminoglycoside Susceptibility and Pathogenesis of Burkholderia pseudomallei Clinical Isolates from Thailand
Development of Burkholderia mallei and pseudomallei vaccines
More...

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2010

Burkholderia pseudomallei Is Spatially Distributed in Soil in Northeast Thailand

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000694

Direk Limmathurotsakul ,Vanaporn Wuthiekanun,Narisara Chantratita,Gumphol Wongsuvan,Premjit Amornchai,Nicholas P. J. Day,Sharon J. Peacock

Full-Text Cite this paper Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background Melioidosis is a frequently fatal infectious disease caused by the soil dwelling Gram-negative bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei. Environmental sampling is important to identify geographical distribution of the organism and related risk of infection to humans and livestock. The aim of this study was to evaluate spatial distribution of B. pseudomallei in soil and consider the implications of this for soil sampling strategies. Methods and Findings A fixed-interval sampling strategy was used as the basis for detection and quantitation by culture of B. pseudomallei in soil in two environmental sites (disused land covered with low-lying scrub and rice field) in northeast Thailand. Semivariogram and indicator semivariogram were used to evaluate the distribution of B. pseudomallei and its relationship with range between sampling points. B. pseudomallei was present on culture of 80/100 sampling points taken from the disused land and 28/100 sampling points from the rice field. The median B. pseudomallei cfu/gram from positive sampling points was 378 and 700 for the disused land and the rice field, respectively (p = 0.17). Spatial autocorrelation of B. pseudomallei was present, in that samples taken from areas adjacent to sampling points that were culture positive (negative) for B. pseudomallei were also likely to be culture positive (negative), and samples taken from areas adjacent to sampling points with a high (low) B. pseudomallei count were also likely to yield a high (low) count. Ranges of spatial autocorrelation in quantitative B. pseudomallei count were 11.4 meters in the disused land and 7.6 meters in the rice field. Conclusions We discuss the implications of the uneven distribution of B. pseudomallei in soil for future environmental studies, and describe a range of established geostatistical sampling approaches that would be suitable for the study of B. pseudomallei that take account of our findings.

References

[1]	Currie BJ, Dance DA, Cheng AC (2008) The global distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei and melioidosis: an update. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 102: Suppl 1S1–S4. doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(08)70002-6
[2]	Cheng AC, Currie BJ (2005) Melioidosis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev 18: 383–416. doi: 10.1128/CMR.18.2.383-416.2005
[3]	Strauss JM, Groves MG, Mariappan M, Ellison DW (1969) Melioidosis in Malaysia. II. Distribution of Pseudomonas pseudomallei in soil and surface water. Am J Trop Med Hyg 18: 698–702.
[4]	Smith MD, Wuthiekanun V, Walsh AL, White NJ (1995) Quantitative recovery of Burkholderia pseudomallei from soil in Thailand. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 89: 488–490. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(95)90078-0
[5]	Wuthiekanun V, Smith MD, Dance DA, White NJ (1995) Isolation of Pseudomonas pseudomallei from soil in north-eastern Thailand. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 89: 41–43. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(95)90651-7
[6]	Wuthiekanun V, Smith MD, Dance DA, Walsh AL, Pitt TL, et al. (1996) Biochemical characteristics of clinical and environmental isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei. J Med Microbiol 45: 408–412. doi: 10.1099/00222615-45-6-408
[7]	Brook MD, Currie B, Desmarchelier PM (1997) Isolation and identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei from soil using selective culture techniques and the polymerase chain reaction. J Appl Microbiol 82: 589–596. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1997.tb03589.x
[8]	Parry CM, Wuthiekanun V, Hoa NT, Diep TS, Thao LT, et al. (1999) Melioidosis in Southern Vietnam: clinical surveillance and environmental sampling. Clin Infect Dis 29: 1323–1326. doi: 10.1086/313479
[9]	Vuddhakul V, Tharavichitkul P, Na-ngam N, Jitsurong S, Kunthawa B, et al. (1999) Epidemiology of Burkholderia pseudomallei in Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg 60: 458–461.
[10]	Wuthiekanun V, Mayxay M, Chierakul W, Phetsouvanh R, Cheng AC, et al. (2005) Detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei in soil within the Lao People's Democratic Republic. J Clin Microbiol 43: 923–924. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.2.923-924.2005
[11]	Kaestli M, Mayo M, Harrington G, Watt F, Hill J, et al. (2007) Sensitive and specific molecular detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei, the causative agent of melioidosis, in the soil of tropical northern Australia. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 6891–6897. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01038-07
[12]	Kaestli M, Mayo M, Harrington G, Ward L, Watt F, et al. (2009) Landscape Changes Influence the Occurrence of the Melioidosis Bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei in Soil in Northern Australia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3: e364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000364
[13]	Merianos A, Patel M, Lane JM, Noonan CN, Sharrock D, et al. (1993) The 1990–1991 outbreak of melioidosis in the Northern Territory of Australia: epidemiology and environmental studies. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 24: 425–435.
[14]	Currie BJ, Mayo M, Anstey NM, Donohoe P, Haase A, et al. (2001) A cluster of melioidosis cases from an endemic region is clonal and is linked to the water supply using molecular typing of Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates. Am J Trop Med Hyg 65: 177–179.
[15]	Inglis TJ, Foster NF, Gal D, Powell K, Mayo M, et al. (2004) Preliminary report on the northern Australian melioidosis environmental surveillance project. Epidemiol Infect 132: 813–820. doi: 10.1017/S0950268804002663
[16]	Vesaratchavest M, Tumapa S, Day NP, Wuthiekanun V, Chierakul W, et al. (2006) Nonrandom distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei clones in relation to geographical location and virulence. J Clin Microbiol 44: 2553–2557. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00629-06
[17]	Cressie N (1993) Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley-Interscience.
[18]	Franklin RB, Mills AL (2003) Multi-scale variation in spatial heterogeneity for microbial community structure in an eastern Virginia agricultural field. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 44: 335–346. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00074-6
[19]	Kirwan N, Oliver MA, Moffat AJ, Morgan GW (2005) Sampling the soil in long-term forest plots: the implications of spatial variation. Environ Monit Assess 111: 149–172. doi: 10.1007/s10661-005-8219-0
[20]	Nunan N, Wu K, Young IM, Crawford JW, Ritz K (2003) Spatial distribution of bacterial communities and their relationships with the micro-architecture of soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 44: 203–215. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00027-8
[21]	McBratney AB, Webster R, Burgess TM (1981) The Design of Optimal Sampling Schemes for Local Estimation and Mapping of Regionalized Variables-I. Computers and Geosciences 7: 331–334. doi: 10.1016/0098-3004(81)90077-7
[22]	Modis K, Papaodysseus K (2008) Theoretical estimation of the critical sampling size for homogeneous ore bodies with small nugget effect. Mathematical Geology 38: 489–501. doi: 10.1007/s11004-005-9020-x
[23]	Chantratita N, Wuthiekanun V, Limmathurotsakul D, Vesaratchavest M, Thanwisai A, et al. (2008) Genetic Diversity and Microevolution of Burkholderia pseudomallei in the Environment. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2: e182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000182
[24]	Wuthiekanun V, Limmathurotsakul D, Chantratita N, Feil EJ, Day NP, et al. (2009) Burkholderia pseudomallei is Genetically Diverse in Agricultural Land in Northeast Thailand. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3: e496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000496
[25]	Chantratita N, Wuthiekanun V, Boonbumrung K, Tiyawisutsri R, Vesaratchavest M, et al. (2007) Biological relevance of colony morphology and phenotypic switching by Burkholderia pseudomallei. J Bacteriol 189: 807–817. doi: 10.1128/JB.01258-06
[26]	Wuthiekanun V, Anuntagool N, White NJ, Sirisinha S (2002) Short report: a rapid method for the differentiation of Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia thailandensis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 66: 759–761.
[27]	Schabenberger O, Pierce FJ (2002) Contemporary Statistical Models for the Plant and Soil Sciences. FL: CRC Press.
[28]	Ranjard L, Richaume A (2001) Quantitative and qualitative microscale distribution of bacteria in soil. Res Microbiol 152: 707–716. doi: 10.1016/S0923-2508(01)01251-7
[29]	Pierson LS III, Keppenne VD, Wood DW (1994) Phenazine antibiotic biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aureofaciens 30–84 is regulated by PhzR in response to cell density. J Bacteriol 176: 3966–3974.
[30]	Pierson LS III, Wood DW, Pierson EA, Chancey ST (1998) Homoserine lactone-mediated gene regulation in plant-associated bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 36: 207–225. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.207
[31]	Von Bodman SB, Bauer WD, Coplin DL (2003) Quorum sensing in plant-pathogenic bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 41: 455–482. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095652
[32]	Salles JF, De Souza FA, van Elsas JD (2002) Molecular method to assess the diversity of Burkholderia species in environmental samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 1595–1603. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.4.1595-1603.2002
[33]	Salles JF, van Veen JA, van Elsas JD (2004) Multivariate analyses of Burkholderia species in soil: effect of crop and land use history. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 4012–4020. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.7.4012-4020.2004
[34]	Salles JF, van Elsas JD, van Veen JA (2006) Effect of agricultural management regime on Burkholderia community structure in soil. Microb Ecol 52: 267–279. doi: 10.1007/s00248-006-9048-6
[35]	Webster R, Oliver MA (1992) Sample adequately to estimate variograms of soil properties. J Soil Sci 43: 497–512. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1992.tb00128.x
[36]	Charles JK (1998) Sampling desings: random, adaptive, and systematic sampling. Ecological methodology. CA: Addision-Welsey Educational Publishers. pp. 261–302.

Full-Text