全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

消费者恶意“薅羊毛”行为:概念、机制与治理
Malicious “Pulling the Sheep’s Wool” Behavior by Consumers: Concept, Mechanism, and Governance

DOI: 10.12677/ap.2026.161047, PP. 407-413

Keywords: 恶意“薅羊毛”行为,概念界定,形成机制,治理路径
Malicious “Pulling the Sheep’s Wool” Behavior
, Conceptual Definition, Formation Mechanism, Governance Approach

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

随着数字经济的蓬勃发展,“薅羊毛”行为已成为消费者参与促销活动的常见现象。然而,部分消费者逐渐突破平台规则边界演变成为具有恶意性质的“薅羊毛”行为,严重扰乱市场秩序、损害营商环境。文章就恶意“薅羊毛”行为的概念、具体类型和形成机制进行系统梳理,并从多个维度提出综合治理路径,以期为推动恶意“薅羊毛”行为相关治理实践提供理论参考。
With the rapid development of the digital economy, “pulling the sheep’s wool” behavior has become a common phenomenon among consumers participating in promotional activities. However, some consumers have gradually crossed the boundaries of platform rules, evolving into malicious “pulling the sheep’s wool” behavior, which seriously disrupts market order and harms the business environment. This paper systematically analyzes the concept, specific types, and formation mechanisms of malicious “pulling the sheep’s wool” behavior, and proposes comprehensive governance measures from multiple dimensions, aiming to provide a theoretical reference for advancing the governance practices related to such malicious activities.

References

[1]  陈航, 韩泰元(2022). 利用订单系统漏洞侵财行为的罪名适用——以肯德基“薅羊毛”案为例. 陇东学院学报, 33(3), 58-63.
[2]  董春华(2021). 论侵权法中恶意的界定及运用. 南通大学学报(社会科学版), 37(1), 97-106.
[3]  葛晨虹(2012). 诚信缺失背后的社会机制缺位. 人民论坛, (5), 4-5.
[4]  焦海涛(2022). 互联网不兼容行为中“恶意”的解释与认定. 法学家, (4), 115-127+194.
[5]  李鑫(2016). P2P网贷市场中的“羊毛党”及其对平台的影响. 金融评论, 8(6), 32-47+122.
[6]  李颖(2023). 借维权规则薅商家羊毛. 中国质量万里行, (7), 42-43.
[7]  彭新林(2024). 网络“薅羊毛”行为的刑事规制. 中国刑事法杂志, (3), 126-141.
[8]  佟日(2020). 国外“羊毛党”不好当. 检察风云, (4), 18-19.
[9]  汪泽(1996). 民法上的善意、恶意及其运用. 河北法学, (1), 7-12.
[10]  王妍(2019). 电商盛宴, 牵出“羊毛党”的灰色产业链. 新产经, (12), 86-87.
[11]  谢宜璋(2025). 恶意提起知识产权诉讼的认定与规制——以141份裁判文书为样本. 环球法律评论, 47(3), 38-52.
[12]  薛洪言, 陈若平(2017). 加强营销攻防全面围堵“羊毛党”. 互联网经济, (12), 26-31.
[13]  杨志军, 梁陞(2018). 风险感知偏差视角下城市邻避抗争的运行机理与治理之道. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 45(4), 42-47.
[14]  姚林青(2022). “薅羊毛”背后的重要动因与风险监管. 人民论坛, (3), 28-31.
[15]  周瑞春(2020). 网络消费社会中的共同体想象与重构——以“羊毛党”网络民族志考察为例. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 47(5), 74-82.
[16]  周晓军(2017). 对互联网金融背景下“羊毛党”的评析及管控对策研究. 法制与社会, (27), 75-76.
[17]  邹开亮, 王米娜(2020). 《民法典》救济标价错误网络商家合同权益的路径初探——以“羊毛党”恶意下单现象为例. 价格理论与实践, (8), 29-33.
[18]  Alesanco-Llorente, M., Reinares-Lara, E., Pelegrín-Borondo, J., & Olarte-Pascual, C. (2023). The Mobile-Assisted Showroomer’s Dilemma: Where to Buy? Actions to Prevent Sales Leakage. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01564-7
[19]  Bandura, A. (2017). Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities. In Recent Developments in Criminological Theory (pp. 135-152). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315089089-12
[20]  Fridman, G. H. L. (1958). Malice in the Law of Torts. The Modern Law Review, 21, 484-500.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1958.tb00488.x
[21]  Kurzban, R., Burton-Chellew, M. N., & West, S. A. (2015). The Evolution of Altruism in Humans. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 575-599.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015355
[22]  McDonald, T., & Dan, L. (2022). “Pulling the Sheep’s Wool”: The Labour of Online Thrift in a Chinese Factory. Journal of Consumer Culture, 22, 398-416.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540520955206
[23]  Shih, D. H., Huang, F. C., Chieh, C. Y., Shih, M. H., & Wu, T. W. (2021). Preventing Return Fraud in Reverse Logistics—A Case Study of ESPRES Solution by Ethereum. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16, 2170-2191.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16060121
[24]  Wang, Y., Stoner, J. L., & John, D. R. (2019). Counterfeit Luxury Consumption in a Social Context: The Effects on Females’ Moral Disengagement and Behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29, 207-225.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1071

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133