|
人工智能的伦理缺失:情感与道德的空白
|
Abstract:
自人工智能问世以来,国内外学者就其伦理问题进行了广泛而深入的讨论。然而,对于人工智能自身的伦理问题,探讨相对较少。本文主张,尽管当前人工智能技术取得了显著进步,但其本质仍然是工具,而非具有道德自主性的实体。因此,人工智能引发的伦理问题主要源于人类的决策和行为,而非人工智能自身。本文通过探讨人工智能在情感和道德层面的缺失,阐明其与人类在伦理决策上的根本区别,旨在为理解和应对人工智能时代的伦理挑战提供新的思考和见解。
Since the advent of artificial intelligence, there has been extensive and in-depth discussion among scholars globally regarding its ethical implications. However, discussions specifically about the eth-ical issues intrinsic to artificial intelligence itself have been relatively scarce. This paper contends that, despite the significant advancements in current artificial intelligence technology, its funda-mental nature remains that of a tool, not an entity with moral autonomy. Consequently, the ethical issues associated with artificial intelligence mainly originate from human decisions and behaviors, not from the artificial intelligence itself. By examining the lack of emotional and moral dimensions in artificial intelligence, this paper highlights the fundamental differences in ethical decision-making between AI and humans, aiming to provide new insights and perspectives for under-standing and addressing the ethical challenges in the era of artificial intelligence.
[1] | [英]洛克. 人类理解论[M]. 关文运, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1983. |
[2] | Kluver, H. and Bucy, P.C. (1937) ‘Psychic Blindness’ and Other Symptoms Following Bilateral Temporal Lobectomy. American Journal of Physiology, 119, 254-284. |
[3] | Bostrom, N. and Yudkowsky, E. (2014) The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Frankish, K. and Ramsey, W., Eds., Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge University Press, New York, 316-334.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139046855.020 |
[4] | Brey, P. (2014) From Moral Agents to Moral Factors: The Structural Ethics Approach. In: Kroes, P. and Verbeek, P.P. Eds., The Moral Status of Technical Artifacts, Springer, Dordrecht, 125-142.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7914-3_8 |
[5] | 张今杰. 人工智能体的道德主体地位问题探讨[J]. 求索, 2022(1): 58-65. |