It is well-known that
Einstein’s first attempt to explain E = mc2 which was published in AnnalenderPhysik in 1905,
has been criticized as problematic. In particular, it has been shown by Ives
and reiterated by Jammer that it suffers from the error of circular reasoning.
Attempts have been made in the scientific literature to discount the circular
reasoning objection of Ives, Jammer, Arzeliès and others. Fritz Rohrlich in
1990 gave a remarkably simple and concise derivation of E = mc2 along lines similar to Einstein’s but based on both momentum and energy conservation, in contrast to Einstein’s which uses only
energy considerations. Rohrlich’s approach using momentum conservation is an
alternative to Einstein’s, which is free from objection in logical error, and
we make it quite clear on the importance of the implicit assumption of momentum
conservation in any attempt to refute the circular reasoning error in
Einstein’s paper. It is our contention that this point is overlooked or
altogether avoided by those who have attempted to uproot the circular reasoning
criticism of Einstein’s paper.
References
[1]
Abraham, M. (1902). Dynamik des Elektrons. Königliche Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen: Mathematisch-physikalische Klasse. Nachrichten. 20-41.
[2]
Abraham, M. (1903). Prinzipien der Dynamik des Elektrons. Annalen der Physik, 10, 105-179. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19023150105
[3]
Arzeliès, H. (1966). Rayonnement et Dynamique du Corpuscule Chargé Fortement Acceléré (pp. 74-79). Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
[4]
Dopper, C. (1843). über das farbige Licht der Doppelsterne und einiger anderer Gestirne des Himmels. Abhandlungen der Konig. Böhmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften Series, 2, 465-482.
[5]
Einstein, A. (1905a). Zur Electrodynamik Bewegter Körper. Annalen der Physik, 17, 639-641.
[6]
Einstein, A. (1905b). Ist die Trägheit eines Körpers von seinem Energieinhalt Abhänging? Annalen der Physik, 18, 639-641.
[7]
Fadner, W. L. (1988). Did Einstein Really Discover E = mc2. American Journal of Physics, 56, 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15713
[8]
Fermi, E. (1922). über einen Widerspruch zwischen der elektrodynamischen und der relativistischen Theorie der elektromagnetischen Masse. Physikalische Zeitschrift, 23, 340-344.
[9]
Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2011). Fundamentals of Physics (9th ed., p. 899). New York: Wiley.
[10]
Hecht, E. (2011). How Einstein Confirmed E0 = mc2. American Journal of Physics, 79, 591-600. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3549223
[11]
Ives, H. E. (1953). Derivation of the Mass-Energy Relation. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 42, 540-543. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.42.000540
[12]
Jammer, M. (1961). The Concepts of Mass in Classical and Modern Physics (p. 181). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[13]
Jammer, M. (2000). Concepts of Mass in Contemporary Physics and Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823789
[14]
Janssen, M., & Mecklenburg, M. (2006). From Classical to Relativistic Mechanics: Electromagnetic Models of the Electron. In V. F. Hendricks, K. F. Jø rgensen, J. Lützen, & S. A. Pedersen (Eds.), Interactions: Mathematics, Physics and Philosophy, 1860-1930 (pp. 65-134). Dodrecht: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5195-1_3
[15]
Martinez, A. A. (2009). Kinematics: The Lost Origins of Einstein’s Relativity (p. 256). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
[16]
Miller, A. I. (1981). Albert Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity: Emergence (1905) and Early Interpretation (1905-1911) (p. 377). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2914975
[17]
Moylan, P., Lombardi, J., & Moylan, S. (2016). Einstein’s 1905 Paper on E = mc2. American Journal of Undergraduate Research, 13, 5-10.
http://www.ajuronline.org/volume-13-issue-1-january-2016
https://doi.org/10.33697/ajur.2016.002
[18]
Ohanian, H. C. (2009). Did Einstein Prove E = mc2? Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 40, 167-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2009.03.002
[19]
Planck, M. (1907). Sitz. der Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Physik Math. Klasse 13 (June).
[20]
Poincaré, H. (1900). La théorie de Lorentz et le principe de réaction. Archives nèerlandaises des Sciences exactes et naturelles, 5, 252-278.
[21]
Rohrlich, F. (1990). An Elementary Derivation of E = mc2. American Journal of Physics, 58, 348-350. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16168
[22]
Schild, A. (1959). The Clock Paradox in Relativity Theory. The American Mathematical Monthly, 66, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1959.11989234
[23]
Stachel, J., & Torretti, R. (1982). Einstein’s First Derivation of the Mass-Energy Equivalence. American Journal of Physics, 50, 760-763. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.12764
[24]
Whittaker, E. T. (1973). A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity (Vol. 2). New York: Humanities Press.
