全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2012 

Identification of Lygus hesperus by DNA Barcoding Reveals Insignificant Levels of Genetic Structure among Distant and Habitat Diverse Populations

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034528

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background The western tarnished plant bug Lygus hesperus is an economically important pest that belongs to a complex of morphologically similar species that makes identification problematic. The present study provides evidence for the use of DNA barcodes from populations of L. hesperus from the western United States of America for accurate identification. Methodology/Principal Findings This study reports DNA barcodes for 134 individuals of the western tarnished plant bug from alfalfa and strawberry agricultural fields in the western United States of America. Sequence divergence estimates of <3% reveal that morphologically variable individuals presumed to be L. hesperus were accurately identified. Paired estimates of Fst and subsequent estimates of gene flow show that geographically distinct populations of L. hesperus are genetically similar. Therefore, our results support and reinforce the relatively recent (<100 years) migration of the western tarnished plant bug into agricultural habitats across the western United States. Conclusions/Significance This study reveals that despite wide host plant usage and phenotypically plastic morphological traits, the commonly recognized western tarnished plant bug belongs to a single species, Lygus hesperus. In addition, no significant genetic structure was found for the geographically diverse populations of western tarnished plant bug used in this study.

References

[1]  Schwartz MD, Foottit RG (1998) Nearctic species of Lygus Hahn with a review of the palearctice species (Heteroptera: Miridae). In: Gupta VK, editor. Memoirs on Entomology, International. Associated Publishers. 428 p. Memoir 10.
[2]  Scott DR (1977) An annotated listing of host plants of Lygus hesperus Knight. Entomol Soc Am Bull 23: 19–22.
[3]  Schreiber ASAlfalfa and Alfalfa Seed Production. In the Washington Ag. Project. Available: http://www.snakeriver.org/wscpr/index.cf?m. Accessed 2009 Jan.
[4]  Butts RA, Lamb RJ (1991) Pest status of Lygus bugs (Hemiptera: Miridae) in oilseed Brassica crops. J Econ Entom 84: 1591–1596.
[5]  Geisler M (2011) Commodity Strawberry Profile. USDA, Ag Marketing Resource Center. Available: http://www.agmrc.org/commodities_product?s/fruits/strawberries/commodity_strawber?ry_profile.cfm. Accessed 2011 Nov.
[6]  Zalom FG, Shaw DV, Larson KD (2006) Strawberry insects and mites in California, ecology and control. In: Pimentel D, editor. Encyclopedia of Pest Management. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York. Available: http://www.dekker.com/sdek/abstract~db=e?nc~content=a713627116. [DOI: 10.1081/E-EPM-120041243]. Accessed March 8, 2012.
[7]  Zalom FG, Pickel C, Welch N (1990) Recent trends in strawberry arthropod management for coastal areas of the western United States, Monitoring and Integrated Management of Arthropod Pests of Small Fruit Crops,. In: Wilson LT, Bostanian NJ, Dennehy TJ, editors. pp. 239–259. Intercept Press, Ltd. Winborne, England.
[8]  Snodgrass GL (1996) Insecticide resistance in field populations of the tarnished plant bug (Heteroptera: Miridae) in cotton in the Mississippi Delta. J Econ Entomol 89: 783–790.
[9]  Snodgrass GL, Scott WP (2000) Seasonal changes in pyrethroid resistance in tarnished plant bug (Heteroptera: Miridae) populations during a three-year period in the Delta area of Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. J Econ Entomol 93: 441–446.
[10]  Goodell PB (2009) Fifty years of the intergrated control concept: the role of landscape ecology in IPM in San Joaquin valley cotton. Pest Manag Sci 65: 1293–1297.
[11]  Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological Identifications through DNA Barcodes. Proc Roy Soc B: 270.1512: 313.
[12]  Savolainen V, Cowan RS, Vogler AP, Roderick GK, Lane R (2005) Towards writing the encyclopedia of life: an introduction to DNA barcoding. Phil Trans R Soc B 360: 1805–1811.
[13]  Park DS, Foottit R, Maw E, Hebert PDN (2011) Barcoding Bugs: DNA-based identification of the true bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera). PLoS One 6: e18749:
[14]  Jung S, Duwal RK, Lee S (2011) DNA Barcoding: COI barcoding of true bugs (Insecta: Heteroptera). Mol Ecol Res. 11. : 266–270.
[15]  Kelly LJ (2010) BARCODING - DNA barcoding of African Podostemaceae (river-weeds): A test of proposed barcode regions. Taxon 59.1: 251.
[16]  Mueller SC, Summers CG, Goodell PB (2003) A field key to the most common Lygus species found in agronomic crops of the central San Joaquin Valley of California. Univ of CA Agriculture and Natural Resources Publications 8104. Available: http://cottoninfo.ucdavis.edu/IMAGES/lyg?us8104.pdf. Accessed 2012 Jan.
[17]  Kumar S (2008) MEGA: A biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Briefings in Bioinfo 9.4: 299.
[18]  Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck J, van der Mark P (2005) MrBayes 3.1. Available: http://mrbayes.csit.fsu.edu/manual.php. Accessed 2011 Jan.
[19]  Posada D (2008) jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Mole Biol Evol 25: 1253–1256.
[20]  Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52: 696–704.
[21]  Excoffier L, Laval G, Schnieder S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1: 47–50.
[22]  Templeton AR, Crandall KA, Sing CF (1992) A cladistics analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132: 619–633.
[23]  Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mole Ecol 9: 1657–1660.
[24]  Bandelt HJ (1999) Median-Joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mole Biol Evol 16.1: 37–48.
[25]  Hebert PD (2004) Ten species in one: DNA Barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101.41: 14812.
[26]  Galloway D, Jones DR, Ingebritsen SE (1999) Land subsidence in the United States. US Geological Survey, Circular 1182. Available: http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/circ1182/. Accessed 2011 Aug.
[27]  Putnam D (1996) History, importance, and production dynamics of alfalfa in California. Proceedings, 27th National Alfalfa Symposium and 26th California Alfalfa Symposium, San Diego, CA. Available: http://alfalfa.ucdavis.edu/symposium/pro?ceedings/1996/96-01.pdf. Accessed 2011 Aug.
[28]  Leigh TF, Grimes DW, Yamada H (1970) Insects in cotton as affected by irrigation and fertilization practices. California Agriculture March pp12-14. DOI#10.3733.
[29]  Waters TD (2009) Ecology and management of Lygus and the distribution and species composition of Peristenus spp.in Washington. Dissertation, Washington State University Department of Entomology.
[30]  Armstrong K (2010) DNA barcoding: a new module in New Zealand's plant biosecurity diagnostic toolbox. Bulletin OEPP 40.1: 91–100.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133