基于OBE理念的“医学信息系统分析与设计”课程目标达成度评价
Evaluating the Achievement Degree of Curriculum Objectives in “Analysis and Design of Medical Information System” Based on Outcome-Based Education

目的：基于成果导向教育理念科学评价“医学信息系统分析与设计”课程目标达成度，以促进课程教学的持续改进，确保课程目标有效支撑学生的毕业要求，满足社会对医学信息学专业人才的需求。方法：首先，根据工程教育专业认证标准及我校电子信息科学与技术本科专业的毕业要求，重新梳理和制定“医学信息系统分析与设计”课程的知识、能力和素质目标。其次，确定课程成绩组成要素及分值比例，构建课程项目评价指标、小组汇报评价指标及其与课程目标之间的对应关系，再制订课程目标达成度计算方案，并给出教学实践案例。结果：通过实施课程目标达成度评价，发现学生在工程知识、需求分析、系统设计、工具应用等方面表现出较高的达成度，但在部分通识能力和创新能力方面仍有提升空间。评价结果为课程教学的持续改进提供了数据支持。结论：通过科学评价课程目标达成度，可以准确掌握学生的能力达成情况，指导课程内容的优化和教学方法的改进，提升教学质量。
Objective: The purpose is to scientifically evaluate the achievement degree of the curriculum objectives of the “Analysis and Design of Medical Information System” course based on the Outcome-Based Education (OBE) concept, in order to promote continuous improvement in curriculum teaching, ensure that the curriculum objectives effectively support students’ graduation requirements, and meet the demand for medical informatics professionals in society. Methods: Firstly, the knowledge, ability, and quality objectives of the “Analysis and Design of Medical Information System” course were re-examined and formulated according to the engineering education professional certification standards and the graduation requirements of our university’s Electronic Information Science and Technology undergraduate program. Secondly, the components and weighting proportions of course grades were determined, and the Curriculum Project Evaluation Index (CPEI), group presentation evaluation index, and their corresponding relationships with the curriculum objectives were established. Then, a calculation scheme for the achievement degree of curriculum objectives was formulated, and a teaching practice case was presented. Results: Through the implementation of the evaluation of the achievement degree of curriculum objectives, it was found that students demonstrated a high level of achievement in aspects such as engineering knowledge, requirement analysis, system design, and tool application. However, there is still room for improvement in some general abilities and innovation capabilities. The evaluation results provided data support for the continuous improvement of curriculum teaching. Conclusion: By scientifically evaluating the achievement degree of curriculum objectives, we can accurately grasp the achievement of students’ abilities, guide the optimization of course content and improvement of teaching methods, and ultimately enhance the quality of teaching.